Monica Celli

Dr. Monica Celli

Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"- IRST S.r.l. IRCCS
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 July 2015 in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMohsen Beheshti
Mohsen Beheshti
FMF. M. Mottaghy
F. M. Mottaghy
FPF. Payche
F. Payche
FBF. F. F. Behrendt
F. F. F. Behrendt
TWTim Van den Wyngaert
Tim Van den Wyngaert
WLW. Langsteger
W. Langsteger

16 June 2014 in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPaolo Castellucci
Paolo Castellucci
Francesco CeciFrancesco Ceci
Francesco Ceci
TGTiziano Graziani
Tiziano Graziani
RSRiccardo Schiavina
Riccardo Schiavina
EBEugenio Brunocilla
Eugenio Brunocilla
Stefano FantiStefano Fanti
Stefano Fanti
The aim of the study was to assess which factors may influence 11C-choline PET/CT detection rate in a population of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients listed for salvage radiation therapy (S-RT) in an early phase of biochemical relapse, to select which patients could obtain the most benefit by performing restaging 11C-choline PET/CT before S-RT. Methods: The study comprised 605 patients, treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) with curative intent for PCa who showed rising PSA levels after primary therapy and listed for S-RT. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values were >0.2 ng/mL and <2 ng/mL (mean, 1.05 ng/mL; median, 1.07 ng/mL; range, 0.2–2 ng/m; SD, ±0.59). All patients were classified as N0 after RP. Seventeen of 605 patients received adjuvant RT together with RP, whereas 148 of 605 patients received androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) at the time of PET/CT. PSA, PSA kinetics, Gleason score, age, time to biochemical relapse, ADT, and initial tumor stage were statistically analyzed to assess which factor could influence PET/CT positivity and the detection of local versus distant relapse. Results: 11C-choline PET/CT was positive in 28.4% of patients (172/605). Eighty-three of 605 patients were positive in the pelvis (group A), distant metastasis (group B) were detected in 72 of 605 patients, and local and distant sites of relapse were detected in 17 of 605 patients (group C). At multivariate analysis, PSA, PSA doubling time (PSAdt), and ongoing ADT were significant predictors for positive scan results, whereas PSA and PSAdt were significantly related to distant relapse detection (P < 0.05). At the receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, a PSA value of 1.05 ng/mL and PSAdt of 5.95 mo were determined to be the optimal cutoff values in the prediction of a positive 11C-choline PET/CT scan, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.625 for PSA and 0.677 for PSAdt. Conclusion: 11C-choline PET/CT may be suggested before S-RT during the early phase of biochemical relapse, to select patients who may benefit from this aggressive treatment. Particularly, patients showing fast PSA kinetics or PSA increasing levels despite ongoing ADT should be studied with 11C-choline PET/CT before S-RT, considering the higher probability to detect positive findings outside the pelvis.

26 November 2014 in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RCRobert Carr
Robert Carr
Stefano FantiStefano Fanti
Stefano Fanti
DPDiana Paez
Diana Paez
Juliano J CerciJuliano J Cerci
Juliano J Cerci
TGTamás Györke
Tamás Györke
TGthe IAEA Lymphoma Study Group
the IAEA Lymphoma Study Group
The International Atomic Energy Agency sponsored a large, multinational, prospective study to further define PET for risk stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and to test the hypothesis that international biological diversity or diversity of healthcare systems may influence the kinetics of treatment response as assessed by interim PET (I-PET). Methods: Cancer centers in Brazil, Chile, Hungary, India, Italy, the Philippines, South Korea, and Thailand followed a common protocol based on treatment with R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, hydroxyadriamycin, vincristine, prednisolone with rituximab), with I-PET after 2–3 cycles of chemotherapy and at the end of chemotherapy scored visually. Results: Two-year survivals for all 327 patients (median follow-up, 35 mo) were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74%–83%) for event-free survival (EFS) and 86% (95% CI, 81%–89%) for overall survival (OS). Two hundred ten patients (64%) were I-PET–negative, and 117 (36%) were I-PET–positive. Two-year EFS was 90% (95% CI, 85%–93%) for I-PET–negative and 58% (95% CI, 48%–66%) for I-PET–positive, with a hazard ratio of 5.31 (95% CI, 3.29–8.56). Two-year OS was 93% (95% CI, 88%–96%) for I-PET–negative and 72% (95% CI, 63%–80%) for I-PET–positive, with a hazard ratio of 3.86 (95% CI, 2.12–7.03). On sequential monitoring, 192 of 312 (62%) patients had complete response at both I-PET and end-of-chemotherapy PET, with an EFS of 97% (95% CI, 92%–98%); 110 of these with favorable clinical indicators had an EFS of 98% (95% CI, 92%–100%). In contrast, the 107 I-PET–positive cases segregated into 2 groups: 58 (54%) achieved PET-negative complete remission at the end of chemotherapy (EFS, 86%; 95% CI, 73%–93%); 46% remained PET-positive (EFS, 35%; 95% CI, 22%–48%). Heterogeneity analysis found no significant difference between countries for outcomes stratified by I-PET. Conclusion: This large international cohort delivers 3 novel findings: treatment response assessed by I-PET is comparable across disparate healthcare systems, secondly a negative I-PET findings together with good clinical status identifies a group with an EFS of 98%, and thirdly a single I-PET scan does not differentiate chemoresistant lymphoma from complete response and cannot be used to guide risk-adapted therapy.

11 September 2014 in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Juliano J CerciJuliano J Cerci
Juliano J Cerci
TGTamás Györke
Tamás Györke
Stefano FantiStefano Fanti
Stefano Fanti
DPDiana Paez
Diana Paez
JMJosé Cláudio Meneghetti
José Cláudio Meneghetti
RCRobert Carr
Robert Carr
Bone marrow is an important extranodal site in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and marrow histology has been incorporated into the new National Comprehensive Cancer Network international prognostic index. Marrow involvement demonstrated histologically confers poor prognosis but is identified by staging PET in more cases. How information from staging PET and biopsy should be combined to optimize outcome prediction remains unclear. Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency sponsored a prospective international cohort study to better define the use of PET in DLBCL. As a planned subsidiary analysis, we examined the interplay of marrow involvement identified by PET and biopsy on clinical outcomes. Results: Eight countries contributed 327 cases with a median follow-up of 35 mo. The 2-y outcomes of cases with no evidence of marrow involvement (n = 231) were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76%–86%) for event-free survival (EFS) and 88% (83%–91%) for overall survival (OS); cases identified only on PET (n = 61), 81% (69%–89%) for EFS and 88% (77%–94%) for OS; cases indentified only on biopsy (n = 10), 80% (41%–95%) for EFS and 100% for OS; or cases identified by both PET and biopsy (n = 25), 45% (25%–64%) for EFS and 55% (32%–73%) for OS. The hazard ratios for PET-negative/biopsy-negative cases versus PET-positive/biopsy-positive cases were 2.67 (95% CI, 1.48–4.79) for EFS and 3.94 (1.93–8.06) for OS. Conclusion: This large study demonstrates that positive iliac crest biopsy histology only confers poor prognosis for patients who also have abnormal marrow 18F-FDG uptake identified on the staging PET scan. Abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in marrow, when iliac crest biopsy histology is normal, has no adverse effect on outcomes.

1 February 2013 in Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CNCristina Nanni
Cristina Nanni
Elena ZamagniElena Zamagni
Elena Zamagni
MCMonica Celli
Monica Celli
PCPaola Caroli
Paola Caroli
Valentina AmbrosiniValentina Ambrosini
Valentina Ambrosini
Stefano FantiStefano Fanti
Stefano Fanti
The objective of this study was to analyze the prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT after therapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). One hundred seven patients prospectively recruited with MM had FDG PET/CT at staging 3 months after therapy (autologous stem cell transplantation) and every 6 to 12 months during the follow-up (mean 41 months). Patients were divided into group 1 (relapsed) and group 2 (nonrelapsed). In group 1, PET results and SUV(max) were compared to the time to relapse (TTR). In group 2, the presence of PET finding changes during follow-up was analyzed to identify typical patterns of disease behavior (ie, late responders or stabilized disease). Patients with a negative PET at staging were excluded from further evaluation. Forty-seven out of 107 (44%) patients relapsed: 10 were excluded because of a negative PET at staging. In group 1, 22 patients had a negative posttherapy PET (59%, mean TTR = 27.6 months) and 15 had a positive posttherapy PET (41%, mean TTR = 18 months). There was a significant difference between the TTR of the two subgroups (t test P = 0.05). In patients with a positive posttherapy PET, the SUV(max) was inversely correlated to the TTR (correlation coefficient = -0.7; P < 0.01).Sixty out of 107 (56%) patients did not relapse. Twenty patients were excluded because of a negative PET at staging. In group 2, 27 patients had a negative posttherapy PET (68%) and 13 had a positive posttherapy PET (32%). None of nonrelapsed patients showed a progressive increase in SUV(max) during the follow-up. There was no significant difference between relapsed and nonrelapsed patients in terms of SUV(max) at posttherapy PET/CT (t test P = 0.7). In our series of MM patients, a negative posttherapy PET was predictive for nonrelapse or a long disease-free survival. In contrast, a persistent significantly increased SUV(max) after therapy was correlated to a short TTR.

6 July 2011 in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CFChiara Fuccio
Chiara Fuccio
RSRiccardo Schiavina
Riccardo Schiavina
PCPaolo Castellucci
Paolo Castellucci
Domenico RubelloDomenico Rubello
Domenico Rubello
GMGiuseppe Martorana
Giuseppe Martorana
SFStefano Fanti
Stefano Fanti