Filomena Giulia Sileo

Dr. Filomena Giulia Sileo

1. Department of Biochemical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, International Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 January 2019 in The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGiovanni Grandi
Giovanni Grandi
Fabio BarraFabio Barra
Fabio Barra
Simone FerreroSimone Ferrero
Simone Ferrero
FSFilomena Giulia Sileo
Filomena Giulia Sileo
Emma BertucciEmma Bertucci
Emma Bertucci
FFFabio Facchinetti
Fabio Facchinetti
A systematic review was carried out of studies of women with endometriosis, to examine the evidence for efficacy of the use of hormonal contraception to improve disease-related pain and decrease postoperative risk of disease recurrence. A search of the Medline/PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify all published English language studies on hormonal contraceptive therapies (combined hormonal contraceptives [CHCs], combined oral contraceptives [COCs], progestin-only pills [POPs] and progestin-only contraceptives [POCs]) in women with a validated endometriosis diagnosis, in comparison with placebo, comparator therapies or other hormonal therapies. Main outcome measures were endometriosis-related pain (dysmenorrhoea, pelvic pain and dyspareunia), quality of life (QoL) and postoperative rate of disease recurrence during treatment. CHC and POC treatments were associated with clinically significant reductions in dysmenorrhoea, often accompanied by reductions in non-cyclical pelvic pain and dyspareunia and an improvement in QoL. Only two COC preparations (ethinylestradiol [EE]/norethisterone acetate [NETA] and a flexible EE/drospirenone regimen) demonstrated significantly increased efficacy compared with placebo. Only three studies found that the postoperative use of COCs (EE/NETA, EE/desogestrel and EE/gestodene) reduced the risk of disease recurrence. There was no evidence that POCs reduced the risk of disease recurrence. CHCs and POCs are effective for the relief of endometriosis-related dysmenorrhoea, pelvic pain and dyspareunia, and improve QoL. Some COCs decreased the risk of disease recurrence after conservative surgery, but POCs did not. There is insufficient evidence, however, to reach definitive conclusions about the overall superiority of any particular hormonal contraceptive.

2 January 2019 in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RTRosemary Townsend
Rosemary Townsend
FDFrancesco D'Antonio
Francesco D'Antonio
FSFilomena Giulia Sileo
Filomena Giulia Sileo
HKHafsah Kumbay
Hafsah Kumbay
BTBasky Thilaganathan
Basky Thilaganathan
Asma KhalilAsma Khalil
Asma Khalil

14 December 2018 in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDaniele Di Mascio
Daniele Di Mascio
FSFilomena Giulia Sileo
Filomena Giulia Sileo
Asma KhalilAsma Khalil
Asma Khalil
Giuseppe RizzoGiuseppe Rizzo
Giuseppe Rizzo
NPNicola Persico
Nicola Persico
FDFrancesco D'Antonio
Francesco D'Antonio

1 June 2021 in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FDFrancesco D'Antonio
Francesco D'Antonio
VBVincenzo Berghella
Vincenzo Berghella
DMDaniele Di Mascio
Daniele Di Mascio
GSGabriele Saccone
Gabriele Saccone
FSFilomena Giulia Sileo
Filomena Giulia Sileo
AKAsma Khalil
Asma Khalil

26 March 2018 in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GGGiovanni Grandi
Giovanni Grandi
AFAntonino Farulla
Antonino Farulla
FSFilomena Giulia Sileo
Filomena Giulia Sileo
FFFabio Facchinetti
Fabio Facchinetti
The availability and use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), such as levonorgestrel intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs), have increased in recent times. The authors provide a narrative review of the LNG-IUSs currently available worldwide as female contraceptives (LNG-IUS 13.5, 19.5 and 52 mg). Specific features of the devices and their parameters of efficacy and tolerability were considered as outcomes. The one-handed 3.8-mm-diameter inserter of LNG-IUS 13.5 mg and 19.5 mg may be particularly suitable in nulliparous women. While LNG-IUSs 13.5, 19.5 mg and LNG 52 mg should be used by women simply looking for an effective contraceptive method for up to 3, 4 or 5 years, LNG-IUS 52 mg has also been approved for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding and endometrial protection during hormone replacement therapy. LNG-IUS 52 mg is ideal for women who are experiencing a certain hyperestrogenic hormonal environment, with heavy menstrual bleeding due to hormonal imbalances, adenomyosis or fibroids, in the case of symptomatic endometriosis or for endometrial protection during hormone estrogenic replacement therapy in non-hysterectomized women.

11 July 2020 in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FSFilomena Giulia Sileo
Filomena Giulia Sileo
DMDaniele Di Mascio
Daniele Di Mascio
Giuseppe RizzoGiuseppe Rizzo
Giuseppe Rizzo
MCMassimo Caulo
Massimo Caulo
LMLucia Manganaro
Lucia Manganaro
FDFrancesco D'Antonio
Francesco D'Antonio