Göran Ericsson

Prof. Göran Ericsson

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 November 2014 in Conservation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Sabrina DresselSabrina Dressel
Sabrina Dressel
CSCamilla Sandström
Camilla Sandström
GEGöran Ericsson
Göran Ericsson

1 May 2015 in Wildlife Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MEMax Eriksson
Max Eriksson
CSCamilla Sandström
Camilla Sandström
GEGöran Ericsson
Göran Ericsson
Understanding how changes in the sizes of large carnivore populations affect the attitudes of the public is vital in order to mitigate social conflicts over large carnivore management issues. Using data from two Swedish postal surveys in 2004 and 2009, we examined the probable social effects of a continued increase in the Swedish populations of bear and wolf by comparing levels of direct experience of bears and wolves with public attitudes towards these animals. We report an increase in direct experience of bears and wolves, lower levels of acceptance of the existence of these animals, and a lower degree of support for the policy goals of both species in 2009 compared to 2004. We also find that these changes are more prominent in areas with local carnivore populations than in other areas of Sweden. Our results imply that attitudes towards bears and wolves are likely to become more negative as populations continue to grow. The uneven distributions of the carnivore populations are likely to generate more frequent social conflicts in the future as they could cause an increase in the attitudinal divide between those members of the Swedish public who have had direct experiences of carnivores and those who have not.

4 May 2015 in Movement Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WNWiebke Neumann
Wiebke Neumann
SMSebastian Martinuzzi
Sebastian Martinuzzi
AEAnna B Estes
Anna B Estes
APAnna M Pidgeon
Anna M Pidgeon
HDHolger Dettki
Holger Dettki
VRVolker Radeloff
Volker Radeloff
Animal movement patterns in space and time are a central aspect of animal ecology. Remotely-sensed environmental indices can play a key role in understanding movement patterns by providing contiguous, relatively fine-scale data that link animal movements to their environment. Still, implementation of newly available remotely-sensed data is often delayed in studies of animal movement, calling for a better flow of information to researchers less familiar with remotely-sensed data applications. Here, we reviewed the application of remotely-sensed environmental indices to infer movement patterns of animals in terrestrial systems in studies published between 2002 and 2013. Next, we introduced newly available remotely-sensed products, and discussed their opportunities for animal movement studies. Studies of coarse-scale movement mostly relied on satellite data representing plant phenology or climate and weather. Studies of small-scale movement frequently used land cover data based on Landsat imagery or aerial photographs. Greater documentation of the type and resolution of remotely-sensed products in ecological movement studies would enhance their usefulness. Recent advancements in remote sensing technology improve assessments of temporal dynamics of landscapes and the three-dimensional structures of habitats, enabling near real-time environmental assessment. Online movement databases that now integrate remotely-sensed data facilitate access to remotely-sensed products for movement ecologists. We recommend that animal movement studies incorporate remotely-sensed products that provide time series of environmental response variables. This would facilitate wildlife management and conservation efforts, as well as the predictive ability of movement analyses. Closer collaboration between ecologists and remote sensing experts could considerably alleviate the implementation gap. Ecologists should not expect that indices derived from remotely-sensed data will be directly analogous to field-collected data and need to critically consider which remotely-sensed product is best suited for a given analysis.

1 January 2014 in Ecology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NSNavinder J. Singh
Navinder J. Singh
KDKjell Danell
Kjell Danell
LELars Edenius
Lars Edenius
GEGöran Ericsson
Göran Ericsson
Singh, N. J., K. Danell, L. Edenius, and G. Ericsson. 2014. Tackling the motivation to monitor: success and sustainability of a participatory monitoring program. Ecology and Society 19(4): 7.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06665-190407

1 May 2011 in Environmental and Resource Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMattias Boman
Mattias Boman
LMLeif Mattsson
Leif Mattsson
GEGöran Ericsson
Göran Ericsson
BKBengt Kriström
Bengt Kriström

1 January 2017 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMilla Niemi
Milla Niemi
CRChrister M. Rolandsen
Christer M. Rolandsen
WNWiebke Neumann
Wiebke Neumann
TKTuomas Kukko
Tuomas Kukko
RTRaisa Tiilikainen
Raisa Tiilikainen
GEGöran Ericsson
Göran Ericsson