The Simao Basin is one of the most important Mesozoic salt basins in China, and the salt rocks generally contain mud-clast conglomerates. The characteristics of mud-clast conglomerates can provide effective information indicating the evolution process of the salt deposits. A combined analysis of trace elements and clay minerals was performed to characterize the genetic model of mud-clast conglomerates in the salt rocks. The results show that the sedimentary materials are felsic rocks from the Upper Crust. Ternary plot diagrams show that the tectonic settings are between the continental margin and the continental island arc. The clay minerals in the samples mainly contain illite and illite-smectite mixed layers. A dry and hot climate prevailed during the deposition of the Mengyejing Formation, and the warm-humid climate that also occurred is interspersed in some periods. Evaporation makes the water bodies shallower, and the concentrated brine starts to precipitate salt under the arid and hot climate conditions. Redox proxies indicate that most of the samples were deposited in relatively oxic conditions. The Sr/Ba ratios (average of 0.5) and paleosalinity (average of similar to 35 parts per thousand) during the depositional period indicate an increase in terrigenous freshwater input and carry of clasts into the evaporation basin. Furthermore, the freshwater supply enhances the hydrodynamics; as a result, the detritus that deposited in the early stage is broken into mud-clast conglomerates and co-deposited with the salt rocks. The results provide a geochemical basis for further study of mudclast conglomerates in the Simao Basin and supply recommendations for the origin of salt deposits in similar basins around the world.
In depth of the Simao Basin (2390 to 2650 m depth interval), many gray mudstone or carbonate rocks are developed in the red salt-related strata, and pyrite crystals are found in the fissure and matrix. In this study, petrology, mineralogy, element geochemistry, and LA-MC-ICP-MS in situ sulfur isotope analysis were used to constrain the genesis of pyrite, and the influence of relevant geological activities on potash mineralization was discussed. The results show that: (1) In the upper part of the salt layer, particle size of the pyrite ranges from 50 to 300 μm. The crystal morphology is mainly pentagonal-dodecahedral and irregularly granular, with a small amount of cuboidal pyrite. In the interlayer between rock salt, particle size of the pyrite is from 50 to 100 μm, and the crystals are mainly octahedral. (2) The S/Fe value of pentagonal-dodecahedral pyrite is significantly greater than 2; the S/Fe value of octahedral and cubic pyrite is less than 2; and the S/Fe value of irregular granular pyrite is close to 2. (3) The δ34SV-CDT values of pyrite in the upper salt-related strata range from −15.65‰ to 11.81‰, and the average δ34SV-CDT values of all samples range from 0.79‰ to 8.20‰. The δ34SV-CDT values of pyrite interlayer between rock salt range from −15.02‰ to −6.36‰, with an average value of −10.66‰. The above results indicate that the pyrite in the upper part of the rock salt layer was formed in a medium-low temperature hydrothermal environment, and the ore-forming sulfur elements have hydrothermal sources, bacterial sulfate reduction (BSR) sources, and thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) contributions. The pyrite between the rock salt layers is of sedimentary origin, and the ore-forming sulfur element comes from BSR. At present, there is no evidence of the influence of hydrothermal activities on deep potash-rich salt bodies, and the influence on the Mengyejing potash deposit has continued since the metallogenic period.
27 April 2018 in Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition
The lithology and genesis of a dark grey clastic interlayer first encountered within the deepest potassium-rich salt body in the Simao Basin, southwestern China, were analysed. Analyses of the petrography, mineralogy, and element geochemistry of the layer revealed that (1) the layer contains quartz crystals with gulf corrosion edges and explosion cracks and angular volcanic ash-sized glasses; (2) the main mineral components of the crystal fragments are chlorite, illite, biotite, quartz, anhydrite, gypsum, magnesite, pyrite, molybdenite, clinopyroxene, and zircon; (3) the rare earth element patterns, Zr/TiO2 and Nb/Y diagrams as well as boron content all indicate a volcanic origin for the layer. Based on these observations, the layer is suggested to be an altered tuff associated with various volcanic fragments dominated by chlorite and formed after alteration of a parent tuff in an alkaline, salty, and low-temperature water body. Discovery of the layer indicates that the potash-bearing salt rocks could have taken in volcanic materials during these volcanic activities and provides the possibility of reliable zircon U‒Pb dating to determine the absolute age of the host rock, which is fundamental in studying the genetic mechanism of this deeply buried salt body.