Kyriaki Aroni

Dr. Kyriaki Aroni

University of Perugia - Department of Medicine and Surgery
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
AGAlessio Gili
Alessio Gili
MBMauro Bacci
Mauro Bacci
KAKyriaki Aroni
Kyriaki Aroni
Alessia NicolettiAlessia Nicoletti
Alessia Nicoletti
AGAngela Gambelunghe
Angela Gambelunghe
Cristiana GambelungheCristiana Gambelunghe
Cristiana Gambelunghe
From 22 March until 18 May 2020, a complete lockdown in Italy was ordered as a countermeasure against the COVID-19 pandemic. Social isolation measures affect some populations more than others, and people with drug and/or alcohol disorders (SUDs) are more likely to be adversely affected. This study presents, for the first time, laboratory data on the use of alcohol and drugs in a high-risk population during Italy’s first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirty subjects with SUDs were monitored for the use of illicit drugs and alcohol every 3 months before, during and after the lockdown, by hair analysis. The number of samples positive for heroin, cocaine, MDMA and cannabis fell considerably during the lockdown and then resumed to pre-lockdown levels when the period of confinement was over. Interestingly, the consumption of benzodiazepines and alcohol followed the opposite trend; both the number of benzodiazepine-positive samples and the level of alcohol consumption increased and remained high, even at the end of the lockdown. The confinement measures produced significant changes in drug/alcohol use patterns, with a shift toward the use of substances that were more easily accessible, used as self-medication for negative feelings, and used to alleviate the effects of abstinence from drugs that were no longer readily available.

27 May 2008 in Biomedical Chromatography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Cristiana GambelungheCristiana Gambelunghe
Cristiana Gambelunghe
KAKyriaki Aroni
Kyriaki Aroni
RRRiccardo Rossi
Riccardo Rossi
LMLuca Moretti
Luca Moretti
MBMauro Bacci
Mauro Bacci

12 February 2007 in Biomedical Chromatography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Cristiana GambelungheCristiana Gambelunghe
Cristiana Gambelunghe
MSM. Sommavilla
M. Sommavilla
CFC. Ferranti
C. Ferranti
RRR. Rossi
R. Rossi
KAKyriaki Aroni
Kyriaki Aroni
MBM. Bacci
M. Bacci

1 December 2015 in Drug Testing and Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cristiana GambelungheCristiana Gambelunghe
Cristiana Gambelunghe
RRRiccardo Rossi
Riccardo Rossi
KAKyriaki Aroni
Kyriaki Aroni
AGAlessio Gili
Alessio Gili
MBMauro Bacci
Mauro Bacci
NFNadia Fucci
Nadia Fucci
Even though hair analysis often seems to be the best choice for retrospective monitoring of cocaine intake, differentiating between incorporated cocaine and external contamination is widely debated. In this study we report results obtained in 90 hair samples from addicts. All samples were analyzed for cocaine, benzoylecgonine, norcocaine, cocaethylene, and tropococaine by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) techniques coupled with direct immersion solid‐phase micro‐extraction. Cocaine concentrations were stratified into three classes of usage: light (0.5–3 ng/mg), moderate (3.1–10 ng/mg) and heavy (10.1–40 ng/mg). The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration cut‐off criteria for establishing active cocaine use were applied to the results. For all samples criteria were cocaine levels above 0.5 ng/mg (ranging from 1.63 to 39.29 ng/mg, mean 9.49 ng/mg), benzoylecgonine concentrations ≥ 0.05 ng/mg (ranging from 0.19 to 5.77 ng/mg, mean 1.40), and benzoylecgonine to cocaine % ratio ≥5% (from 6.43 to 26.09%). Norcocaine was present in 58.9% of samples (concentration range: 0.22–3.14 ng/mg) and was strongly predictive only of heavy cocaine use (sensitivity 100% for cocaine concentrations above 9.58 ng/mg). Twenty hair samples from moderate and heavy users tested positive for cocaethylene (concentration range: 0.22–1.98 ng/mg, mean 0.73 ng/mg). This study on hair samples with no chance of false positive cases highlights the very limited applications of testing minor cocaine metabolites for definitive proof of active cocaine consumption. © 2015 The Authors. Drug Testing and Analysis Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

17 August 2012 in Journal of Forensic Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Cristiana GambelungheCristiana Gambelunghe
Cristiana Gambelunghe
RMRemo Marsili
Remo Marsili
KAKyriaki Aroni
Kyriaki Aroni
MBMauro Bacci
Mauro Bacci
RRRiccardo Rossi
Riccardo Rossi

1 October 2016 in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cristiana GambelungheCristiana Gambelunghe
Cristiana Gambelunghe
NFNadia Fucci
Nadia Fucci
KAKyriaki Aroni
Kyriaki Aroni
MBMauro Bacci
Mauro Bacci
AMAntonio Marcelli
Antonio Marcelli
RRRiccardo Rossi
Riccardo Rossi
Background: Sweat testing, an alternative matrix for establishing drug abuse, offers additional benefits to the more common biological samples. The authors developed a procedure using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to test for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid, cannabinol (CBN), and cannabidiol (CBD) in a sweat patch. The results were compared with urine and hair sample results. Methods: Urine, hair, and sweat samples were simultaneously collected from 12 patients who were involved, respectively, in forensic case and monitoring abuse. Selectivity, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), recovery, intraday and interday imprecision, and inaccuracy of the quantification procedure were validated. LODs in hair were 0.05 ng/mg for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, CBN, and CBD, and 0.005 ng/mg for 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid. The LOD for sweat was 0.30 ng/patch for all substances. The LOQ in hair was 0.1 ng/mg for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, CBN, and CBD, and 0.01 ng/mg for 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid. The LOQ was 0.4 ng/patch in sweat for each analyte. Cannabinoid in urine was determined by means of immunochemical screening (cutoff 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid 50 ng/mL). Results: All subjects tested positive for 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in urine and hair. In sweat samples, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol was found in all patches (0.4–2.0 ng/patch); 6 cases were positive for CBN (0.4–0.5 ng/patch) and 3 for CBD (0.4–0.6 ng/patch); 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid was never detected in patches. Conclusions: Present sweat analysis results integrated the information from hair and urine and showed that sweat analysis is a suitable, noninvasive method for monitoring compliance with rehabilitation therapy and for detecting recent cumulative use of cannabinoids.