Objective: To compare the oncologic outcomes of liver resection (LR) and local ablation therapies for HCC. Summary of Background Data: Although several studies have compared LR and local ablation therapies, the optimal treatment of choice for HCC within the Milan criteria remains controversial. Methods: We systemically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) and matched nonrandomized trials (NRTs) that compared LR and local ablation therapies for HCC within the Milan criteria. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were recurrence free survival (RFS) and recurrence pattern. Results: A total of 7 RCTs and 18 matched NRTs, involving 2865 patients in the LR group and 2764 patients in the local ablation therapy group [RFA, MWA, RFA plus trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE)], were included. Although there was no significant difference in OS between LR and RFA, LR showed a significantly better 5-year RFS than RFA in the analysis of RCTs (hazards ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.62–0.92; P = 0.006). The RFA group showed a significantly higher local recurrence than the LR group in both analyses of RCTs and NRTs. Additionally, the LR group showed better OS and RFS than the MWA or RFA plus TACE groups. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed that LR was superior to RFA in terms of RFS and incidence of local recurrence. Moreover, LR showed better oncologic outcomes than MWA or RFA plus TACE.

Background In gallbladder cancer, stage T2 is subdivided by tumour location into lesions on the peritoneal side (T2a) or hepatic side (T2b). For tumours on the peritoneal side (T2a), it has been suggested that liver resection may be omitted without compromising the prognosis. However, data to validate this argument are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of tumour location in T2 gallbladder cancer, and to clarify the adequate extent of surgical resection. Methods Clinical data from patients who underwent surgery for gallbladder cancer were collected from 14 hospitals in Korea, Japan, Chile and the USA. Survival and risk factor analyses were conducted. Results Data from 937 patients were available for evaluation. The overall 5‐year disease‐free survival rate was 70·6 per cent, 74·5 per cent for those with T2a and 65·5 per cent among those with T2b tumours (P = 0·028). Regarding liver resection, extended cholecystectomy was associated with a better 5‐year disease‐free survival rate than simple cholecystectomy (73·0 versus 61·5 per cent; P = 0·012). The 5‐year disease‐free survival rate was marginally better for extended than simple cholecystectomy in both T2a (76·5 versus 66·1 per cent; P = 0·094) and T2b (68·2 versus 56·2 per cent; P = 0·084) disease. Five‐year disease‐free survival rates were similar for extended cholecystectomies including liver wedge resection versus segment IVb/V segmentectomy (74·1 versus 71·5 per cent; P = 0·720). In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for recurrence were presence of symptoms (hazard ratio (HR) 1·52; P = 0·002), R1 resection (HR 1·96; P = 0·004) and N1/N2 status (N1: HR 3·40, P < 0·001; N2: HR 9·56, P < 0·001). Among recurrences, 70·8 per cent were metastatic. Conclusion Tumour location was not an independent prognostic factor in T2 gallbladder cancer. Extended cholecystectomy was marginally superior to simple cholecystectomy. A radical operation should include liver resection and adequate node dissection.

Although liquid biopsy of blood is useful for cancer diagnosis and prediction of prognosis, diagnostic and prognostic value of ctDNA in bile fluid for BTCs are not clear yet. To determine whether liquid biopsy for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can replace tissue biopsy when assessing somatic mutations in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Bile samples were obtained from 42 patients with BTC. Matched formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples were obtained from 20 of these patients and matched plasma samples from 16 of them. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used for detection KRAS somatic mutation. KRAS mutations were identified in the bile ctDNA of 20 of 42 (48%) patients. Patients with mutant KRAS showed significantly worse survival than those with wild-type KRAS (2-year survival rates: 0% vs. 55.5%, respectively; p = 0.018). There was 80.0% mutational concordance between the paired bile ctDNA and FFPE samples, and 42.9% between the plasma and FFPE samples. On transcriptomic sequencing of one set of paired bile and FFPE samples, expression level of KRAS-associated signaling oncogenes in the bile and tissue samples showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.991, p < 0.001). Liquid biopsy of bile reliably detect mutational variants within the bile ctDNA of BTC patients. These results suggest that bile is an effective biopsy fluid for ctDNA analysis.

Background: Despite retrospective studies comparing anatomical liver resection (AR) and non-anatomical liver resection (NAR), the efficacy and benefits of AR for hepatocellular carcinoma remain unclear. Materials and methods: The authors systemically reviewed MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for propensity score matched cohort studies that compared AR and NAR for hepatocellular carcinoma. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes were recurrence patterns and perioperative outcomes. Results: Overall, 22 propensity score matched studies (AR, n=2,496; NAR, n=2590) were included. AR including systemic segmentectomy was superior to NAR regarding the 3-year and 5-year OS. AR showed significantly better 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year RFS than NAR, with low local and multiple intrahepatic recurrence rates. In the subgroup analyses of tumour diameter less than or equal to 5 cm and tumours with microscopic spread, the RFS in the AR group was significantly better than that in the NAR group. Patients with cirrhotic liver in the AR group showed comparable 3-year and 5-year RFS with the NAR group. Postoperative overall complications were comparable between AR and NAR. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that AR showed better OS and RFS with a low local and multiple intra-hepatic recurrence rate than NAR, especially in patients with tumour diameter less than or equal to 5 cm and non-cirrhotic liver.

Ahn KS, et al. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Apr;96(4):153-161. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2019.96.4.153

Background: Although inflammation induced by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may affect laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), making the procedure more difficult, clinical impact of ERCP on LC is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ERCP on LC and to determine appropriate time of LC after ERCP.Methods: Six hundred twenty‐one patients who underwent LC for gallstone disease were enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups; patients with preoperative ERCP prior to LC (ERCP group) and patients who underwent LC without ERCP (non‐ERCP group). Among these patients, patients who had shown acute cholecystitis or cholangitis were excluded. To control for different demographic factors in the two groups, propensity score case matching was used at a 1:1 ratio. Finally, 142 patients were matched with 71 patients of the ERCP group and 71 patients of the non‐ERCP group. Intraoperative inflammation degree, technical difficulty, and postoperative outcome were analyzed.Results: In the ERCP group, the degree of inflammation was severe and operations were more difficult than those of the non‐ERCP group. The operation time was longer, and rates of open conversion were higher in the ERCP group. On multivariate analysis, preoperative ERCP was significant factor for difficult operations. The difficulty of operation was not different according to the operation timing after ERCP.Conclusion: Preoperative ERCP is a significant factor in difficult LC. Therefore, experienced surgeons should perform LC after preoperative ERCP. Since operation difficulty was similar according to the timing of cholecystectomy after ERCP, there is no reason to delay LC after ERCP.