Statins are the most prescribed and effective drugs to treat cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Nevertheless, these drugs can be responsible for skeletal muscle toxicity which leads to reduced compliance. The discontinuation of therapy increases the incidence of CVD. Thus, it is essential to assess the risk. In fact, many studies have been performed at preclinical and clinical level to investigate pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical implications of statin myotoxicity. Consequently, new toxicological aspects and new biomarkers have arisen. Indeed, these drugs may affect gene transcription and ion transport and contribute to muscle function impairment. Identifying a marker of toxicity is important to prevent or to cure statin induced myopathy while assuring the right therapy for hypercholesterolemia and counteracting CVD. In this review we focused on the mechanisms of muscle damage discovered in preclinical and clinical studies and highlighted the pathological situations in which statin therapy should be avoided. In this context, preventive or substitutive therapies should also be evaluated.

Hypertriglyceridemia therapy is essential for preventing cardiovascular diseases. Fibrates belong to an important class of lipid-lowering drugs useful for the management of dyslipidaemia. By acting on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, these drugs lower serum triglyceride levels and raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Fibrate monotherapy is associated with a risk of myopathy and this risk is enhanced when these agents are administered together with statins. However, whereas gemfibrozil can increase plasma concentrations of statins, fenofibrate has less influence on the pharmacokinetics of statins. Pemafibrate is a new PPAR-α-selective drug considered for therapy, and clinical trials are ongoing. Apart from this class of drugs, new therapies have emerged with different mechanisms of action to reduce triglycerides and the risk of cardiovascular diseases.

Skeletal muscle tissue has the important function of supporting and defending the organism. It is the largest apparatus in the human body, and its function is important for contraction and movements. In addition, it is involved in the regulation of protein synthesis and degradation. In fact, inhibition of protein synthesis and/or activation of catabolism determines a pathological condition called muscle atrophy. Muscle atrophy is a reduction in muscle mass resulting in a partial or complete loss of function. It has been established that many physiopathological conditions can cause a reduction in muscle mass. Nevertheless, it is not well known the molecular mechanisms and signaling processes causing this dramatic event. There are multiple concomitant processes involved in muscle atrophy. In fact, the gene transcription of some factors, oxidative stress mechanisms, and the alteration of ion transport through specific ion channels may contribute to muscle function impairment. In this review, we focused on the molecular mechanisms responsible for muscle damage and potential drugs to be used to alleviate this disabling condition.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis is a neurodegenerative disease caused by progressive loss of motor neurons, which severely compromises skeletal muscle function. Evidence shows that muscle may act as a molecular powerhouse, whose final signals generate in patients a progressive loss of voluntary muscle function and weakness leading to paralysis. This pathology is the result of a complex cascade of events that involves a crosstalk among motor neurons, glia, and muscles, and evolves through the action of converging toxic mechanisms. In fact, mitochondrial dysfunction, which leads to oxidative stress, is one of the mechanisms causing cell death. It is a common denominator for the two existing forms of the disease: sporadic and familial. Other factors include excitotoxicity, inflammation, and protein aggregation. Currently, there are limited cures. The only approved drug for therapy is riluzole, that modestly prolongs survival, with edaravone now waiting for new clinical trial aimed to clarify its efficacy. Thus, there is a need of effective treatments to reverse the damage in this devastating pathology. Many drugs have been already tested in clinical trials and are currently under investigation. This review summarizes the already tested drugs aimed at restoring muscle-nerve cross-talk and on new treatment options targeting this tissue.

Variants in neuronal sodium channel genes are responsible for a spectrum of neurological disorders, including developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs), with considerable genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity and drug resistance. Gene variants can produce loss-, gain-, or mixed-function effects, resulting in complex genotype-phenotype correlations. Current treatments rely mainly on symptomatic polytherapy with antiseizure medications, with sodium channel blockers contraindicated in loss-of-function cases but beneficial in gain-of-function forms. Existing therapies often provide limited benefit or even no seizure control at all and fail to address developmental impairments, highlighting the need for novel approaches. Emerging strategies include antisense oligonucleotides, gene therapy, and selective small-molecule modulators, which have shown antiseizure potential in preclinical models and in initial clinical studies by modulating SCN gene expression and function. Additionally, pharmacological agents such as fenfluramine, stiripentol, and cannabidiol, although not acting directly on sodium channels, represent recognized therapeutic options for SCN1A-related Dravet syndrome. This review summarizes recent advances in approved and investigational treatments for sodium channel-related neurological disorders, highlighting the transition from symptomatic to precision therapies.