Karl Swedberg

Karl Swedberg


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2010 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKarl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg
MKMichel Komajda
Michel Komajda
MBMichael Böhm
Michael Böhm
JBJeffrey S Borer
Jeffrey S Borer
IFIan Ford
Ian Ford
SISHIFT Investigators
SHIFT Investigators

28 March 2013 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKarl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg
JYJames B. Young
James B. Young
IAInder S. Anand
Inder S. Anand
SCSunfa Cheng
Sunfa Cheng
ADAkshay S. Desai
Akshay S. Desai
DVDirk J. van Veldhuisen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
Patients with systolic heart failure and anemia have worse symptoms, functional capacity, and outcomes than those without anemia. We evaluated the effects of darbepoetin alfa on clinical outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure and anemia. In this randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned 2278 patients with systolic heart failure and mild-to-moderate anemia (hemoglobin level, 9.0 to 12.0 g per deciliter) to receive either darbepoetin alfa (to achieve a hemoglobin target of 13 g per deciliter) or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening heart failure. The primary outcome occurred in 576 of 1136 patients (50.7%) in the darbepoetin alfa group and 565 of 1142 patients (49.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the darbepoetin alfa group, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.13; P=0.87). There was no significant between-group difference in any of the secondary outcomes. The neutral effect of darbepoetin alfa was consistent across all prespecified subgroups. Fatal or nonfatal stroke occurred in 42 patients (3.7%) in the darbepoetin alfa group and 31 patients (2.7%) in the placebo group (P=0.23). Thromboembolic adverse events were reported in 153 patients (13.5%) in the darbepoetin alfa group and 114 patients (10.0%) in the placebo group (P=0.01). Cancer-related adverse events were similar in the two study groups. Treatment with darbepoetin alfa did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure and mild-to-moderate anemia. Our findings do not support the use of darbepoetin alfa in these patients. (Funded by Amgen; RED-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00358215.)

1 May 2012 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKarl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg
FZFaiez Zannad
Faiez Zannad
JMJohn J.V. McMurray
John J.V. McMurray
HKHenry Krum
Henry Krum
DVDirk J. van Veldhuisen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
BPBertram Pitt
Bertram Pitt

1 May 2012 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKarl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg
MKMichel Komajda
Michel Komajda
MBMichael Böhm
Michael Böhm
JBJeffrey Borer
Jeffrey Borer
MRMichele Robertson
Michele Robertson
IFIan Ford
Ian Ford

18 December 2009 in European Journal of Heart Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKarl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg
MKMichel Komajda
Michel Komajda
MBMichael Böhm
Michael Böhm
JBJeffrey S. Borer
Jeffrey S. Borer
IFIan Ford
Ian Ford
LTLuigi Tavazzi
Luigi Tavazzi
Aims: Elevated heart rate is a significant marker for mortality and morbidity in cardiovascular disease including heart failure. Despite background treatment with a beta-blocker, many patients with heart failure and low ejection fraction maintain a heart rate above 70 b.p.m. Ivabradine reduces heart rate directly through inhibition of the If ionic current. Methods: SHIFT is a randomized, double-blind study designed to compare ivabradine with placebo on outcomes in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (NYHA class II–IV), left-ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and a prior hospitalization for worsening heart failure within the previous 12 months. Randomized treatment is given on top of guidelines-based therapy for chronic heart failure, including a beta-blocker at optimized dose. Resting heart rate at baseline must be ≥70 b.p.m. The primary endpoint is the composite of the time to first event of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Secondary endpoints include all-cause, cardiovascular and heart failure mortality, and hospitalization. The randomized treatment period lasts approximately 12–48 months. The study will include approximately 6500 patients and will continue until ≥1600 primary endpoints have occurred. The first patient was randomized in October 2006, and the study is expected to end in 2010. Conclusion: The SHIFT study will assess if a heart rate reduction by direct sinus node inhibition can reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction.

23 February 2016 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AWAxel Wolf
Axel Wolf
AFAndreas Fors
Andreas Fors
KUKerstin Ulin
Kerstin Ulin
JTJörgen Thorn
Jörgen Thorn
KSKarl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg
IEInger Ekman
Inger Ekman
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet