Cameron Mcintire

Dr. Cameron Mcintire


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 October 2025 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TOTimothy Ohlert
Timothy Ohlert
MSMelinda D. Smith
Melinda D. Smith
SCScott L. Collins
Scott L. Collins
AKAlan K. Knapp
Alan K. Knapp
JDJeffrey S. Dukes
Jeffrey S. Dukes
XZXiaoan Zuo
Xiaoan Zuo
As droughts become longer and more intense, impacts on terrestrial primary productivity are expected to increase progressively. Yet, some ecosystems appear to acclimate to multiyear drought, with constant or diminishing reductions in productivity as drought duration increases. We quantified the combined effects of drought duration and intensity on aboveground productivity in 74 grasslands and shrublands distributed globally. Ecosystem acclimation with multiyear drought was observed overall, except when droughts were extreme (i.e., ≤1-in-100-year likelihood of occurrence). Productivity losses after four consecutive years of extreme drought increased by ~2.5-fold compared with those of the first year. These results portend a foundational shift in ecosystem behavior if drought duration and intensity increase, from maintenance of reduced functioning over time to progressive and profound losses of productivity when droughts are extreme.

10 July 2023 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDrew M. P. Peltier
Drew M. P. Peltier
MCMariah S. Carbone
Mariah S. Carbone
CMCameron Mcintire
Cameron Mcintire
NRNathan Robertson
Nathan Robertson
RTR. Alex Thompson
R. Alex Thompson
ATAmy M. Trowbridge
Amy M. Trowbridge

7 July 2021 in Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAndrew Cunliffe
Andrew Cunliffe
KAKaren Anderson
Karen Anderson
FBFabio Boschetti
Fabio Boschetti
RBRichard E. Brazier
Richard E. Brazier
HGHugh A. Graham
Hugh A. Graham
RWRobert Wojcikiewicz
Robert Wojcikiewicz
Non‐forest ecosystems, dominated by shrubs, grasses and herbaceous plants, provide ecosystem services including carbon sequestration and forage for grazing, and are highly sensitive to climatic changes. Yet these ecosystems are poorly represented in remotely sensed biomass products and are undersampled by in situ monitoring. Current global change threats emphasize the need for new tools to capture biomass change in non‐forest ecosystems at appropriate scales. Here we developed and deployed a new protocol for photogrammetric height using unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) images to test its capability for delivering standardized measurements of biomass across a globally distributed field experiment. We assessed whether canopy height inferred from UAV photogrammetry allows the prediction of aboveground biomass (AGB) across low‐stature plant species by conducting 38 photogrammetric surveys over 741 harvested plots to sample 50 species. We found mean canopy height was strongly predictive of AGB across species, with a median adjusted R2 of 0.87 (ranging from 0.46 to 0.99) and median prediction error from leave‐one‐out cross‐validation of 3.9%. Biomass per‐unit‐of‐height was similar within but different among, plant functional types. We found that photogrammetric reconstructions of canopy height were sensitive to wind speed but not sun elevation during surveys. We demonstrated that our photogrammetric approach produced generalizable measurements across growth forms and environmental settings and yielded accuracies as good as those obtained from in situ approaches. We demonstrate that using a standardized approach for UAV photogrammetry can deliver accurate AGB estimates across a wide range of dynamic and heterogeneous ecosystems. Many academic and land management institutions have the technical capacity to deploy these approaches over extents of 1–10 ha−1. Photogrammetric approaches could provide much‐needed information required to calibrate and validate the vegetation models and satellite‐derived biomass products that are essential to understand vulnerable and understudied non‐forested ecosystems around the globe.

16 September 2018 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HAHeidi Asbjornsen
Heidi Asbjornsen
JCJohn L. Campbell
John L. Campbell
KJKatie A. Jennings
Katie A. Jennings
MVMatthew A. Vadeboncoeur
Matthew A. Vadeboncoeur
CMCameron Mcintire
Cameron Mcintire
SMSmith
Smith

1 September 2018 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KCKara K.L. Costanza
Kara K.L. Costanza
TWThomas D. Whitney
Thomas D. Whitney
CMCameron Mcintire
Cameron Mcintire
WLWilliam H. Livingston
William H. Livingston
KGKamal Gandhi
Kamal Gandhi

21 September 2017 in Ecological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAdam P. Coble
Adam P. Coble
MVMatthew A. Vadeboncoeur
Matthew A. Vadeboncoeur
ZBZ. Carter Berry
Z. Carter Berry
KJKatie A. Jennings
Katie A. Jennings
CMCameron Mcintire
Cameron Mcintire
HAHeidi Asbjornsen
Heidi Asbjornsen
In the Northeastern U.S., drought is expected to increase in frequency over the next century, and therefore, the responses of trees to drought are important to understand. There is recent debate about whether land-use change or moisture availability is the primary driver of changes in forest species composition in this region. Some argue that fire suppression from the early twentieth century to present has resulted in an increase in shade-tolerant and pyrophobic tree species that are drought intolerant, while others suggest precipitation variability as a major driver of species composition. From this debate, an emerging hypothesis is that mesophication and increases in the abundance of mesophytic genera (e.g., Acer, Betula, and Fagus) resulted in forests that are more vulnerable to drought. This review examines the published literature and factors that contribute to drought vulnerability of Northeastern U.S. forests. We assessed two key concepts related to drought vulnerability, including drought tolerance (ability to survive drought) and sensitivity (short-term responses to drought), with a focus on Northeastern U.S. species. We assessed drought-tolerance classifications for species, which revealed both consistencies and inconsistencies, as well as contradictions when compared to actual observations, such as higher mortality for drought-tolerant species. Related to drought sensitivity, recent work has focused on isohydric/anisohydric regulation of leaf water potential. However, based on the review of the literature, we conclude that drought sensitivity should be viewed in terms of multiple variables, including leaf abscission, stomatal sensitivity, turgor pressure, and dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates. Genera considered drought sensitive (e.g., Acer, Betula, and Liriodendron) may actually be less prone to drought-induced mortality and dieback than previously considered because stomatal regulation and leaf abscission in these species are effective at preventing water potential from reaching critical thresholds during extreme drought. Independent of drought-tolerance classification, trees are prone to dieback and mortality when additional stressors are involved such as insect defoliation, calcium and magnesium deficiency, nitrogen saturation, and freeze-thaw events. Overall, our literature review shows that multiple traits associated with drought sensitivity and tolerance are important as species may rely on different mechanisms to prevent hydraulic failure and depleted carbon reserves that may lead to mortality.