Sikander Ailawadhi

Dr. Sikander Ailawadhi

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 100151, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 October 2019 in Blood Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sikander AilawadhiSikander Ailawadhi
Sikander Ailawadhi
KPKejal Parikh
Kejal Parikh
SASafiya Abouzaid
Safiya Abouzaid
ZZZhou Zhou
Zhou Zhou
WTWenxi Tang
Wenxi Tang
JXJipan Xie
Jipan Xie
The objective of the study was to assess racial disparities in the treatment and outcomes among white, African American, and Hispanic patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Patients with an MM diagnosis from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)–Medicare (2007-2013) database were included. Continuous Medicare enrollment for 6 months before (baseline) and after MM diagnosis was required unless death occurred. Time from MM diagnosis to novel therapy initiation and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), overall survival (OS), and MM-specific survival (MSS) was evaluated. Unadjusted and multivariable regressions compared African Americans and Hispanics vs whites. Trends of novel therapy and ASCT use across MM diagnosis years were assessed using linear regression models. The study included 3504 whites, 858 African Americans, and 468 Hispanics. African Americans and Hispanics had a longer time from MM diagnosis to novel therapy initiation vs whites (median: 5.2 and 4.6 vs 2.7 months, respectively). All cohorts had an increasing trend of novel therapy initiation within 6 months of MM diagnosis, particularly whites (all P < .05). Median MSS was significantly longer for African Americans (5.4 years) than whites (4.5 years; P < .05), and was comparable for Hispanics and whites. Median OS was similar overall (2.6-2.8 years). ASCT rate within 1 year of MM diagnosis rose among whites and African Americans (P < .05), but not Hispanics, who were less likely to receive ASCT vs whites. Significant variations in novel therapy and ASCT use were observed among different racial/ethnic groups with MM. Although OS was similar, both African Americans and Hispanics may not be fully benefitting from the introduction of novel therapies, as they receive them later than whites.

3 November 2017 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sikander AilawadhiSikander Ailawadhi
Sikander Ailawadhi
RFRyan D. Frank
Ryan D. Frank
PAPooja Advani
Pooja Advani
ASAbhisek Swaika
Abhisek Swaika
MTM'Hamed Temkit
M'Hamed Temkit
ACAsher A. Chanan‐Khan
Asher A. Chanan‐Khan
Outcomes have improved considerably in multiple myeloma (MM), but disparities among racial‐ethnic groups exist. Differences in utilization of novel therapeutics are likely contributing factors. We explored such differences from the SEER‐Medicare database. A utilization analysis of lenalidomide, thalidomide, bortezomib, and stem cell transplant (SCT) was performed for patients diagnosed with MM between 2007 and 2009, including use over time, use by race, time‐dependent trends for each racial subgroup, and survival analysis. A total of 5338 MM patients were included with median 2.4‐year follow‐up. Within the first year of MM diagnosis, utilization of lenalidomide, bortezomib, SCT, and more than one novel agent increased over time while utilization of thalidomide decreased. There was significantly lower utilization of lenalidomide among African‐Americans (P < 0.01), higher thalidomide use among Hispanics and Asians (P < 0.01), and lower bortezomib use among Asians (P < 0.01). Hispanics had the highest median number of days to first dose of bortezomib (P = 0.02) and the lowest utilization of SCT (P < 0.01). Hispanics and Asians were the only groups without notable increases in lenalidomide and bortezomib use, respectively. SCT utilization increased over time for all except African‐Americans. SCT use within the first year after diagnosis was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.4–0.68), while bortezomib use was associated with inferior survival (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02–1.28). We noted considerable variability in MM therapeutics utilization with seeming inequity for racial‐ethnic minorities. These trends should be considered to eliminate drug access and utilization disparities and achieve equitable benefit of therapeutic advances across all races.

6 July 2018 in Blood Cancer Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sikander AilawadhiSikander Ailawadhi
Sikander Ailawadhi
SJSusanna Jacobus
Susanna Jacobus
RSRachael Sexton
Rachael Sexton
ASAlexander K. Stewart
Alexander K. Stewart
ADAngela Dispenzieri
Angela Dispenzieri
SRS. Vincent Rajkumar
S. Vincent Rajkumar
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematologic malignancy with disparities in outcomes noted among racial-ethnic subgroups, likely due to disparities in access to effective treatment modalities. Clinical trials can provide access to evidence-based medicine but representation of minorities on therapeutic clinical trials has been dismal. We evaluated the impact of patient race-ethnicity in pooled data from nine large national cooperative group clinical trials in newly diagnosed MM. Among 2896 patients enrolled over more than two decades, only 18% were non-White and enrollment of minorities actually decreased in most recent years (2002–2011). African-Americans were younger and had more frequent poor-risk markers, including anemia and increased lactate dehydrogenase. Hispanics had the smallest proportion of patients on trials utilizing novel therapeutic agents. While adverse demographic (increased age) and clinical (performance status, stage, anemia, kidney dysfunction) factors were associated with inferior survival, patient race-ethnicity did not have an effect on objective response rates, progression-free, or overall survival. While there are significant disparities in MM incidence and outcomes among patients of different racial-ethnic groups, this disparity seems to be mitigated by access to appropriate therapeutic options, for example, as offered by clinical trials. Improved minority accrual in therapeutic clinical trials needs to be a priority.

1 June 2019 in Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSundar Jagannath
Sundar Jagannath
LHLeonard T. Heffner
Leonard T. Heffner
Sikander AilawadhiSikander Ailawadhi
Sikander Ailawadhi
NMNikhil C. Munshi
Nikhil C. Munshi
TZTodd M. Zimmerman
Todd M. Zimmerman
KAKenneth C. Anderson
Kenneth C. Anderson

30 September 2019 in Blood Cancer Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VKVivek Kumar
Vivek Kumar
Sikander AilawadhiSikander Ailawadhi
Sikander Ailawadhi
LBLeyla Bojanini
Leyla Bojanini
AMAditya Mehta
Aditya Mehta
SBSuman Biswas
Suman Biswas
MAMeghna Ailawadhi
Meghna Ailawadhi
With improving survivorship in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the risk of second primary malignancies (SPMs) has not been systematically addressed. Differences in risk for SPMs among CLL survivors from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973–2015) were compared to risk of individual malignancies expected in the general population. In ~270,000 person-year follow-up, 6487 new SPMs were diagnosed with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.2 (95% CI:1.17–1.23). The higher risk was for both solid (SIR 1.15; 95% CI:1.12–1.18) and hematological malignancies (SIR 1.61; 95% CI:1.5–1.73). The highest risk for SPMs was noted between 2 and 5 months after CLL diagnosis (SIR 1.57; 95% CI:1.41–1.74) and for CLL patients between 50- and 79-years-old. There was a significant increase in SPMs in years 2003–2015 (SIR 1.36; 95% CI:1.3–1.42) as compared to 1973–1982 (SIR 1.19; 95% CI:1.12–1.26). The risk of SPMs was higher in CLL patients who had received prior chemotherapy (SIR 1.38 95% CI:1.31–1.44) as compared to those untreated/treatment status unknown (SIR 1.16, 95% CI:1.13–1.19, p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the hazard of developing SPMs was higher among men, post-chemotherapy, recent years of diagnosis, advanced age, and non-Whites. Active survivorship plans and long-term surveillance for SPMs is crucial for improved outcomes of patients with a history of CLL.

5 September 2018 in Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sikander AilawadhiSikander Ailawadhi
Sikander Ailawadhi
KKKevin R. Kelly
Kevin R. Kelly
RVRobert A. Vescio
Robert A. Vescio
SJSundar Jagannath
Sundar Jagannath
JWJeffrey Wolf
Jeffrey Wolf
ACAsher Chanan-Khan
Asher Chanan-Khan