Jan De Beenhouwer

Dr. Jan De Beenhouwer

Imec Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1 Building N, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 October 2016 in Optics Express
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WAWim van Aarle
Wim van Aarle
WPWillem Jan Palenstijn
Willem Jan Palenstijn
JCJeroen Cant
Jeroen Cant
EJEline Janssens
Eline Janssens
FBFolkert Bleichrodt
Folkert Bleichrodt
Jan SijbersJan Sijbers
Jan Sijbers
Object reconstruction from a series of projection images, such as in computed tomography (CT), is a popular tool in many different application fields. Existing commercial software typically provides sufficiently accurate and convenient-to-use reconstruction tools to the end-user. However, in applications where a non-standard acquisition protocol is used, or where advanced reconstruction methods are required, the standard software tools often are incapable of computing accurate reconstruction images. This article introduces the ASTRA Toolbox. Aimed at researchers across multiple tomographic application fields, the ASTRA Toolbox provides a highly efficient and highly flexible open source set of tools for tomographic projection and reconstruction. The main features of the ASTRA Toolbox are discussed and several use cases are presented.

1 October 2015 in Ultramicroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WAWim van Aarle
Wim van Aarle
WPWillem Jan Palenstijn
Willem Jan Palenstijn
JBJan De Beenhouwer
Jan De Beenhouwer
TAThomas Altantzis
Thomas Altantzis
SBSara Bals
Sara Bals
Jan SijbersJan Sijbers
Jan Sijbers

9 September 2015 in Nano Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BGBart Goris
Bart Goris
JBJan De Beenhouwer
Jan De Beenhouwer
ABAnnick De Backer
Annick De Backer
DZDaniele Zanaga
Daniele Zanaga
KBK. Joost Batenburg
K. Joost Batenburg
GTGustaaf Van Tendeloo
Gustaaf Van Tendeloo
The three-dimensional (3D) atomic structure of nanomaterials, including strain, is crucial to understand their properties. Here, we investigate lattice strain in Au nanodecahedra using electron tomography. Although different electron tomography techniques enabled 3D characterizations of nanostructures at the atomic level, a reliable determination of lattice strain is not straightforward. We therefore propose a novel model-based approach from which atomic coordinates are measured. Our findings demonstrate the importance of investigating lattice strain in 3D.

15 October 2015 in Optics Express
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VNVincent Van Nieuwenhove
Vincent Van Nieuwenhove
JBJan De Beenhouwer
Jan De Beenhouwer
FCFrancesco De Carlo
Francesco De Carlo
LMLucia Mancini
Lucia Mancini
FMFederica Marone
Federica Marone
Jan SijbersJan Sijbers
Jan Sijbers
In X-ray imaging, it is common practice to normalize the acquired projection data with averaged flat fields taken prior to the scan. Unfortunately, due to source instabilities, vibrating beamline components such as the monochromator, time varying detector properties, or other confounding factors, flat fields are often far from stationary, resulting in significant systematic errors in intensity normalization. In this work, a simple and efficient method is proposed to account for dynamically varying flat fields. Through principal component analysis of a set of flat fields, eigen flat fields are computed. A linear combination of the most important eigen flat fields is then used to individually normalize each X-ray projection. Experiments show that the proposed dynamic flat field correction leads to a substantial reduction of systematic errors in projection intensity normalization compared to conventional flat field correction.

21 January 2021 in Optics Express
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BSBjörn De Samber
Björn De Samber
JRJens Renders
Jens Renders
TETim Elberfeld
Tim Elberfeld
YMYves Maris
Yves Maris
JSJonathan Sanctorum
Jonathan Sanctorum
Jan SijbersJan Sijbers
Jan Sijbers
Laboratory based X-ray micro-CT is a non-destructive testing method that enables three dimensional visualization and analysis of the internal and external morphology of samples. Although a wide variety of commercial scanners exist, most of them are limited in the number of degrees of freedom to position the source and detector with respect to the object to be scanned. Hence, they are less suited for industrial X-ray imaging settings that require advanced scanning modes, such as laminography, conveyor belt scanning, or time-resolved imaging (4DCT). We introduce a new X-ray scanner FleXCT that consists of a total of ten motorized axes, which allow a wide range of non-standard XCT scans such as tiled and off-centre scans, laminography, helical tomography, conveyor belt, dynamic zooming, and X-ray phase contrast imaging. Additionally, a new software tool ‘FlexRayTools’ was created that enables reconstruction of non-standard XCT projection data of the FleXCT instrument using the ASTRA Toolbox, a highly efficient and open source set of tools for tomographic projection and reconstruction.

1 June 2007 in Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ERErwann Rault
Erwann Rault
SVStefaan Vandenberghe
Stefaan Vandenberghe
RHRoel Van Holen
Roel Van Holen
JBJan De Beenhouwer
Jan De Beenhouwer
SSSteven Staelens
Steven Staelens
ILIgnace Lemahieu
Ignace Lemahieu
I-131 is a frequently used isotope for radionuclide therapy. This technique for cancer treatment requires a pre-therapeutic dosimetric study. The latter is usually performed (for this radionuclide) by directly imaging the uptake of the therapeutic radionuclide in the body or by replacing it by one of its isotopes, which are more suitable for imaging. This study aimed to compare the image quality that can be achieved by three iodine isotopes: I-131 and I-123 for single-photon emission computed tomography imaging, and I-124 for positron emission tomography imaging. The imaging characteristics of each isotope were investigated by simulated data. Their spectrums, point-spread functions, and contrast-recovery curves were drawn and compared. I-131 was imaged with a high-energy all-purpose (HEAP) collimator, whereas two collimators were compared for I-123: low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) and medium energy (ME). No mechanical collimation was used for I-124. The influence of small high-energy peaks (>0.1%) on the main energy window contamination were evaluated. Furthermore, the effect of a scattering medium was investigated and the triple energy window (TEW) correction was used for spectral-based scatter correction. Results showed that I-123 gave the best results with a LEHR collimator when the scatter correction was applied. Without correction, the ME collimator reduced the effects of high-energy contamination. I-131 offered the worst results. This can be explained by the large amount of septal penetration from the photopeak and by the collimator, which gave a low spatial resolution. I-124 gave the best imaging properties owing to its electronic collimation (high sensitivity) and a short coincidence time window.