PURPOSE: Distant metastases are present in 6% or more of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. In this context, locoregional therapy for the intact primary tumor has been hypothesized to improve overall survival (OS), but clinical trials have reported conflicting results. METHODS: Women presenting with metastatic breast cancer and an intact primary tumor received systemic therapy for 4-8 months; if no disease progression occurred, they were randomly assigned to locoregional therapy for the primary site (surgery and radiotherapy per standards for nonmetastatic disease) or continuing sysmetic therapy. The primary end point was OS; locoregional control and quality of life were secondary end points. The trial design provided 85% power to detect a 19.3% absolute difference in the 3-year OS rate in randomly assigned patients. The stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare OS between arms. Cumulative incidence of locoregional progression was compared using Gray's test. Quality-of-life assessment used standard instruments. RESULTS: Of 390 participants enrolled, 256 were randomly assigned: 131 to continued systemic therapy and 125 to early locoregional therapy. The 3-year OS was 67.9% without and 68.4% with early locoregional therapy (hazard ratio = 1.11; 90% CI, 0.82 to 1.52; P = .57). The median OS was 53.1 months (95% CI, 47.9 to not estimable) in the systemic therapy arm and 54.9 months (95% CI, 46.7 to not estimable) in the locoregional therapy arm. Locoregional progression was less frequent in those randomly assigned to locoregional therapy (3-year rate: 16.3% v 39.8%; P < .001). Quality-of-life measures were largely similar between arms. CONCLUSION: Early locoregional therapy for the primary site did not improve survival in patients presenting with metastatic breast cancer. Although it was associated with improved locoregional control, this had no overall impact on quality of life.

CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor implicated in the homing of cancer cells to target metastatic organs, which overexpress its ligand, stromal cell‐derived factor (SDF)‐1. To determine the efficacy of targeting CXCR4 on primary tumor growth and metastasis, we used a peptide inhibitor of CXCR4, CTCE‐9908, that was administered in a clinically relevant approach using a transgenic breast cancer mouse model. We first performed a dosing experiment of CTCE‐9908 in the PyMT mouse model, testing 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg versus the scrambled peptide in groups of 8–16 mice. We then combined CTCE‐9908 with docetaxel or DC101 (an anti‐VEGFR2 monoclonal antibody). We found that increasing doses of CTCE‐9908 alone slowed the rate of tumor growth, with a 45% inhibition of primary tumor growth at 3.5 weeks of treatment with 50 mg/kg of CTCE‐9908 (p = 0.005). Expression levels of VEGF were also found to be reduced by 42% with CTCE‐9908 (p = 0.01). In combination with docetaxel, CTCE‐9908 administration decreased tumor volume by 38% (p = 0.02), an effect that was greater than that observed with docetaxel alone. In combination with DC101, CTCE‐9908 also demonstrated an enhanced effect compared to DC101 alone, with a 37% decrease in primary tumor volume (p = 0.01) and a 75% reduction in distant metastasis (p = 0.009). In combination with docetaxel or an anti‐angiogenic agent, the anti‐tumor and anti‐metastatic effects of CTCE‐9908 were markedly enhanced, suggesting potentially new effective combinatorial therapeutic strategies in the treatment of breast cancer, which include targeting the SDF‐1/CXCR4 ligand/receptor pair.

The major obstacle in successfully treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy, the mainstay of treatment in this disease. Previous preclinical models of chemoresistance in TNBC have suffered from a lack of clinical relevance. Using a single high dose chemotherapy treatment, we developed a novel MDA-MB-436 cell-based model of chemoresistance characterized by a unique and complex morphologic phenotype, which consists of polyploid giant cancer cells giving rise to neuron-like mononuclear daughter cells filled with smaller but functional mitochondria and numerous lipid droplets. This resistant phenotype is associated with metabolic reprogramming with a shift to a greater dependence on fatty acids and oxidative phosphorylation. We validated both the molecular and histologic features of this model in a clinical cohort of primary chemoresistant TNBCs and identified several metabolic vulnerabilities including a dependence on PLIN4, a perilipin coating the observed lipid droplets, expressed both in the TNBC-resistant cells and clinical chemoresistant tumors treated with neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. These findings thus reveal a novel mechanism of chemotherapy resistance that has therapeutic implications in the treatment of drug-resistant cancer. Implications: These findings underlie the importance of a novel morphologic–metabolic phenotype associated with chemotherapy resistance in TNBC, and bring to light novel therapeutic targets resulting from vulnerabilities in this phenotype, including the expression of PLIN4 essential for stabilizing lipid droplets in resistant cells.

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly prognostic and determines whether adjuvant chemotherapy is needed if residual tumor is found at surgery. To evaluate the predictive and prognostic values of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in this setting, we analyzed tumor and serial bloods from 26 TNBC patients collected prior, during, and after NAC. Individual digital droplet PCR assays were developed for 121 variants (average 5/patient) identified from tumor sequencing, enabling ctDNA detection in 96% of patients at baseline. Mutant allele frequency at baseline was associated with clinical characteristics. Levels drastically fell after one cycle of NAC, especially in patients whose tumors would go on to have a pathological complete response (pCR), but then rose significantly before surgery in patients with significant residual tumor at surgery (p = 0.0001). The detection of ctDNA early during treatment and also late at the end of NAC before surgery was strongly predictive of residual tumor at surgery, but its absence was less predictive of pCR, especially when only TP53 variants are considered. ctDNA detection at the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicated significantly worse relapse-free survival (HR = 0.29 (95% CI 0.08–0.98), p = 0.046), and overall survival (HR = 0.27 95% CI 0.075–0.96), p = 0.043). Hence, individualized multi-variant ctDNA testing during and after NAC prior to surgery has prognostic and predictive value in early TNBC patients.

It has become increasingly clear that the cells within the tumor microenvironment play a critical role in cancer growth and metastasis. Studies in experimental models suggest that carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAF) differ from normal fibroblasts and are capable of promoting cancer progression through a variety of mechanisms. At present, a definitive view is lacking on whether genomic abnormalities are present and whether they might underlie the observed phenotypic differences. This study reports the molecular analysis of the largest series of breast CAFs reported to date, with an array comparative genomic hybridization–based DNA copy number analysis of cultured CAFs derived from 25 freshly resected human breast cancers. We found DNA copy number changes consisting of the whole arm of chromosomes 6p and 9p plus interstitial 4q loss in only one sample. No abnormalities were observed in non–tumor-associated fibroblast counterparts. Karyotyping of the same CAF revealed further chromosomal abnormalities, which included clonal loss of chromosomes, chromosomal duplications, and less frequent chromosomal rearrangements. These abnormalities were not associated with alterations in the global gene expression profile of this particular CAF, relative to its non–tumor-associated fibroblast counterpart. Moreover, this particular patient's CAF also displayed the only p53 mutation in the cohort, the first time such a mutation has been reported in freshly cultured human CAFs. These findings argue that the procancerous effects of CAFs are unlikely to be due to DNA copy number–type genomic abnormalities in the CAFs themselves. As such, breast CAFs should be mainly regarded as genomically stable cellular constituents that exist within complex cancer microenvironments. Cancer Res; 70(14); 5770–7. ©2010 AACR.