Brian Wilson

Dr. Brian Wilson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 January 2015 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EHEleanor Hobley
Eleanor Hobley
BWBrian Wilson
Brian Wilson
AWArjan Wilkie
Arjan Wilkie
JGJonathan Gray
Jonathan Gray
TKTerry Koen
Terry Koen

1 August 2012 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSubhadip Ghosh
Subhadip Ghosh
BWBrian Wilson
Brian Wilson
SGSubrata Ghoshal
Subrata Ghoshal
NSNimai Senapati
Nimai Senapati
BMBiswapati Mandal
Biswapati Mandal

1 November 2015 in Soil Science Society of America Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJonathan Gray
Jonathan Gray
TBT.F.A. Bishop
T.F.A. Bishop
BWBrian Wilson
Brian Wilson

1 March 2014 in Geoderma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRS.M. Fazle Rabbi
S.M. Fazle Rabbi
BWBrian Wilson
Brian Wilson
PLPeter V. Lockwood
Peter V. Lockwood
HDHeiko Daniel
Heiko Daniel
IYIain M. Young
Iain M. Young

12 September 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SRS. M. F. Rabbi
S. M. F. Rabbi
HDH. Daniel
H. Daniel
PLP. V. Lockwood
P. V. Lockwood
CMC. Macdonald
C. Macdonald
LPL. Pereg
L. Pereg
IYI. M. Young
I. M. Young
Aggregates play a key role in protecting soil organic carbon (SOC) from microbial decomposition. The objectives of this study were to investigate the influence of pore geometry on the organic carbon decomposition rate and bacterial diversity in both macro- (250–2000 μm) and micro-aggregates (53–250 μm) using field samples. Four sites of contrasting land use on Alfisols (i.e. native pasture, crop/pasture rotation, woodland) were investigated. 3D Pore geometry of the micro-aggregates and macro-aggregates were examined by X-ray computed tomography (μCT). The occluded particulate organic carbon (oPOC) of aggregates was measured by size and density fractionation methods. Micro-aggregates had 54% less μCT observed porosity but 64% more oPOC compared with macro-aggregates. In addition, the pore connectivity in micro-aggregates was lower than macro-aggregates. Despite both lower μCT observed porosity and pore connectivity in micro-aggregates, the organic carbon decomposition rate constant (Ksoc) was similar in both aggregate size ranges. Structural equation modelling showed a strong positive relationship of the concentration of oPOC with bacterial diversity in aggregates. We use these findings to propose a conceptual model that illustrates the dynamic links between substrate, bacterial diversity, and pore geometry that suggests a structural explanation for differences in bacterial diversity across aggregate sizes.

1 January 2016 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EHEleanor U. Hobley
Eleanor U. Hobley
BWBrian Wilson
Brian Wilson
Subsurface soil organic carbon (SOC) is a large but still poorly understood component of the global carbon cycle. We investigated the depth distribution ofSOCin eastern Australia, testing the hypotheses thatSOCcontent near the surface is linked with water availability, whereas the distribution ofSOCwith depth is linked with land use, site factors and temperature. To do this, we measuredSOCconcentration to 1 m at 100 sites across eastern Australia, and fitted three parameter exponential depletion models to the results. Three machine learning algorithms were used to identify predictors important to the model parameters. Multiple regression models were then created based upon the machine learning results using bootstrapped stepwise regressions and the relative importance of the selected variables was assessed using proportional marginal variance decomposition. SurfaceSOCconcentration was influenced predominantly by climate variables, of which seasonal rainfall was by far the most important. At depth,SOCstorage was most influenced by site factors (mainly bulk density and soil type), and both land use and climate contributed similar amounts to model explained variance. The depth distribution ofSOCwas most influenced by land use, which accounted for ~60% of model explained variance, with site and climate factors being approximately equally important. These results support our hypotheses regarding the drivers ofSOCdepth distribution in eastern Australia and can be used to identify regions with the potential for additional subsurface soil carbon storage.