Background: A new trend among users of new psychoactive substances’ the consumption of “herbal highs”: plant parts containing psychoactive substances. Most of the substances extracted from herbs, in old centuries were at the centre of religious ceremonies of ancient civilizations. Currently, these herbal products are mainly sold by internet web sites and easily obtained since some of them have no legal restriction. Objective: We reviewed psychoactive effects and neuropharmacology of the most used “herbal highs” with characterized active principles, with studies reporting mechanisms of action, pharmacological and subjective effects, eventual secondary effects including intoxications and/or fatalities Method: The PubMed database was searched using the following key.words: herbal highs, Ayahuasca; Argyreia Nervosa, Ipomea Violacea and Rivea Corymbosa; Catha edulis; Datura stramonium; Piper Methysticum; Mitragina Speciosa; Trichocereus cacti; Salvia divinorum and Tabernanthe iboga. Results: Psychoactive plants here reviewed have been known and used from ancient times, even if for some of them limited information still exist regarding subjective and neuropharmacological effects and consequent eventual toxicity when plants are used alone or in combination with “classical” drugs of abuse. Conclusion: Some “herbal highs” should be classified as harmful drugs since chronic administration has been linked with addiction and cognitive impairment; for some others taking into consideration only the recent trends of abuse, studies investigating these aspects are lacking.

Although antiepileptic drug (AED) monitoring in saliva may have some clinical applicability, it has not yet come into routine use. The correlation between levetiracetam (LEV) saliva and serum concentrations also remains unclear. To confirm LEV saliva assay as a useful, noninvasive alternative to serum measurement, we investigated the possible correlation between saliva and serum LEV concentrations. Samples of saliva and blood were collected from 30 patients with epilepsy receiving chronic therapy with LEV as monotherapy or add-on therapy, and LEV concentrations were assayed in saliva and serum. Linear regression analyses showed a close correlation between saliva and serum LEV concentrations (r2 = 0.90; P < 0.001). LEV blood and saliva concentrations were linearly related to daily drug doses (r2 = 0.78 and 0.70; P < 0.01). When data were analyzed for subgroups (patients receiving LEV in monotherapy, as add-on therapy with enzyme-inducer AEDs, and as add-on therapy with noninducer or moderate-inducer AEDs), no significant difference was found between saliva and serum LEV concentrations among groups. These preliminary results indicate that LEV, like other AEDs, can be measured in saliva as an alternative to blood-based assays. Saliva LEV collection and assay is a valid noninvasive, more convenient alternative to serum measurement.