Objective To evaluate and quantify the future risk of cardiovascular events in young adults with high blood pressure. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 6 March 2020. Relative risks were pooled using a random effects model and expressed with 95% confidence intervals. Absolute risk difference was calculated. Dose-response relations between blood pressure and individual outcomes were assessed by a restricted cubic spline model. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies were selected that investigated the adverse outcomes of adults aged 18-45 with raised blood pressure. The primary study outcome was a composite of total cardiovascular events. Coronary heart disease, stroke, and all cause mortality were examined as secondary outcomes. Results Seventeen observational cohorts consisting of approximately 4.5 million young adults were included in the analysis. The average follow-up was 14.7 years. Young adults with normal blood pressure had increased risk of cardiovascular events compared with those with optimal blood pressure (relative risk 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.31; risk difference 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.61 per 1000 person years). A graded, progressive association was found between blood pressure categories and increased risk of cardiovascular events (high normal blood pressure: relative risk 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.49; risk difference 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.97 per 1000 person years; grade 1 hypertension: 1.92, 1.68 to 2.19; 1.81, 1.34 to 2.34; grade 2 hypertension: 3.15, 2.31 to 4.29; 4.24, 2.58 to 6.48). Similar results were observed for coronary heart disease and stroke. Generally, the population attributable fraction for cardiovascular events associated with raised blood pressure was 23.8% (95% confidence interval 17.9% to 28.8%). The number needed to treat for one year to prevent one cardiovascular event was estimated at 2672 (95% confidence interval 1639 to 6250) for participants with normal blood pressure, 1450 (1031 to 2326) for those with high normal blood pressure, 552 (427 to 746) for those with grade 1 hypertension, and 236 (154 to 388) for those with grade 2 hypertension. Conclusions Young adults with raised blood pressure might have a slightly increased risk of cardiovascular events in later life. Because the evidence for blood pressure lowering is limited, active interventions should be cautious and warrant further investigation.

Conditioned medium from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC-CM) may represent a promising alternative to MSCs transplantation, however, the low concentrations of growth factors in non-activated MSC-CM hamper its clinical application. Recent data indicated that the paracrine potential of MSCs could be enhanced by inflammatory factors. Herein, we pre-activated bone-marrow-derived MSCs under radiation-induced inflammatory condition (MSC^IEC-6(IR)) and investigated the evidence and mechanism for the differential effects of MSC-CM^IEC-6(IR) and non-activated MSC-CM on radiation-induced intestinal injury (RIII). Systemic infusion of MSC-CM^IEC-6(IR), but not non-activated MSC-CM, dramatically improved intestinal damage and survival of irradiated rats. Such benefits may involve the modulation of epithelial regeneration and inflammation, as indicated by the regeneration of intestinal epithelial/stem cells, the regulation of the pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokine balance. The mechanism for the superior paracrine efficacy of MSC^IEC-6(IR) is related to a higher secretion of regenerative, immunomodulatory and trafficking molecules, including the pivotal factor IGF-1, induced by TNF-α, IL-1β and nitric oxide partially via a heme oxygenase-1 dependent mechanism. Together, our findings suggest that pre-activation of MSCs with TNF-α, IL-1β and nitric oxide enhances its paracine effects on RIII via a heme oxygenase-1 dependent mechanism, which may help us to maximize the paracrine potential of MSCs.

Rationale: The therapeutic benefits of bilirubin in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) are considerable, whereas the underlying mechanism of bilirubin on UC remains unclear remains unexplored. In addition, the weak hydrophilicity and toxicity have limited its translational applications.

Metastasis and recurrence are the challenges of cancer therapy. Recently, mounting evidence has suggested that cancer stem cells (CSCs) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) are critical factors in tumor metastasis and recurrence. The oncogene, Bmi-1, promotes the development of hematologic malignancies and many solid tumors. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the mechanisms through which Bmi-1 promotes the invasion and migration of colon CSCs (CCSCs) using the HCT116 colon cancer cell line. Sphere formation medium and magnetic‑activated cell sorting were used to enrich and screen the CCSCs. CD133 and CD44 were regarded as markers of CCSCs and they were found to be co-expressed in the HCT116 colon cancer cell line. Colony formation assay, cell proliferation assay and viability assay using the Cell Counting Kit-8, and transplantation assay using nude mice injected with CCSCs were used to examine the CCSCs. The CD133+CD44+ HCT116 cells exhibited greater cloning efficiency, an enhanced proliferative ability, increased cell viability and stronger tumorigenicity; these cells were used as the CCSCs for subsequent experiments. In addition, the invasive and migratory abilities of the CD133+CD44+ HCT116 cells were markedly decreased when Bmi-1 was silenced by small interfering RNA (siRNA). The results of RT-qPCR and western blot analysis suggested that Bmi-1 had a negative effect on E-cadherin expression. On the whole, our findings suggest that Bmi-1 promotes the invasion and migration of CCSCs through the downregulation of E-cadherin, possibly by inducing EMT. Our findings thus indicate that Bmi-1 may be a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of colon cancer.

Emerging data have suggested colorectal cancer (CRC) often coexists with cardiovascular diseases, but whether cardiovascular risk factors play a role in CRC remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to better illustrate the associations between cardiovascular risk factors and CRC. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases from inception up to June 14, 2020. Prospective cohort studies were included if they evaluated the association between at least one of cardiovascular risk factors and CRC incidence, containing sufficient data to obtain relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We performed separate meta-analyses for each cardiovascular risk factor using random-effect model. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020175537. Data from 84 studies, reporting 52, 348, 827 individuals and 384, 973 incident cases were included in the analysis. Overall, the risk of CRC was 1.31(95% CI, 1.21–1.42) for obesity, 1.14 (95% CI, 1.09–1.20) for per 5 kg/m2 increase in body mass index, 1.18 (95% CI, 1.14–1.23) for former smoker, 1.20 (95% CI, 1.11–1.30) for current smoker, 1.25 (95% CI, 1.16–1.35) for diabetes, 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02–1.12) for hypertension. The summary RRs of CRC for the highest versus lowest quartiles of total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein were 1.12 (95% CI, 1.03–1.22), 1.18 (95% CI, 1.04–1.35), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.62–1.17) respectively and the pooled RR for the lowest versus highest quartile of high-density lipoprotein was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.02–1.28). Unfavorable cardiovascular risk factors are associated with increased risk of CRC, which may provide novel insight into the screening strategies of CRC in patient with these risk factors.