Andrew Nisbet

Prof. Andrew Nisbet

Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science, University College London, London, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 March 2013 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDSarah C. Darby
Sarah C. Darby
MEMarianne Ewertz
Marianne Ewertz
PMPaul McGale
Paul McGale
ABAnna M. Bennet
Anna M. Bennet
UBUlla Blom-Goldman
Ulla Blom-Goldman
PHPer Hall
Per Hall
Radiotherapy for breast cancer often involves some incidental exposure of the heart to ionizing radiation. The effect of this exposure on the subsequent risk of ischemic heart disease is uncertain.

1 November 2011 in British Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTM Teoh
M Teoh
CCC H Clark
C H Clark
KWK Wood
K Wood
SWS Whitaker
S Whitaker
ANAndrew Nisbet
Andrew Nisbet
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a novel radiation technique, which can achieve highly conformal dose distributions with improved target volume coverage and sparing of normal tissues compared with conventional radiotherapy techniques. VMAT also has the potential to offer additional advantages, such as reduced treatment delivery time compared with conventional static field intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The clinical worldwide use of VMAT is increasing significantly. Currently the majority of published data on VMAT are limited to planning and feasibility studies, although there is emerging clinical outcome data in several tumour sites. This article aims to discuss the current use of VMAT techniques in practice and review the available data from planning and clinical outcome studies in various tumour sites including prostate, pelvis (lower gastrointestinal, gynaecological), head and neck, thoracic, central nervous system, breast and other tumour sites.

1 December 2007 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTCarolyn W. Taylor
Carolyn W. Taylor
ANAndrew Nisbet
Andrew Nisbet
PMPaul McGale
Paul McGale
SDSarah C. Darby
Sarah C. Darby

4 September 2018 in British Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMohammad Hussein
Mohammad Hussein
BHBen J M Heijmen
Ben J M Heijmen
DVDirk Verellen
Dirk Verellen
ANAndrew Nisbet
Andrew Nisbet
Radiotherapy treatment planning of complex radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy, is a resource-intensive process requiring a high level of treatment planner intervention to ensure high plan quality. This can lead to variability in the quality of treatment plans and the efficiency in which plans are produced, depending on the skills and experience of the operator and available planning time. Within the last few years, there has been significant progress in the research and development of intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning approaches with automation support, with most commercial manufacturers now offering some form of solution. There is a rapidly growing number of research articles published in the scientific literature on the topic. This paper critically reviews the body of publications up to April 2018. The review describes the different types of automation algorithms, including the advantages and current limitations. Also included is a discussion on the potential issues with routine clinical implementation of such software, and highlights areas for future research.

26 July 2018 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HTH. M. Thirimanne
H. M. Thirimanne
KJK. D. G. I. Jayawardena
K. D. G. I. Jayawardena
APAndrew Parnell
Andrew Parnell
RBR. M. I. Bandara
R. M. I. Bandara
AKA. Karalasingam
A. Karalasingam
S. Ravi P. SilvaS. Ravi P. Silva
S. Ravi P. Silva
X-ray detectors are critical to healthcare diagnostics, cancer therapy and homeland security, with many potential uses limited by system cost and/or detector dimensions. Current X-ray detector sensitivities are limited by the bulk X-ray attenuation of the materials and consequently necessitate thick crystals (~1 mm–1 cm), resulting in rigid structures, high operational voltages and high cost. Here we present a disruptive, flexible, low cost, broadband, and high sensitivity direct X-ray transduction technology produced by embedding high atomic number bismuth oxide nanoparticles in an organic bulk heterojunction. These hybrid detectors demonstrate sensitivities of 1712 µC mGy−1 cm−3 for “soft” X-rays and ~30 and 58 µC mGy−1 cm−3 under 6 and 15 MV “hard” X-rays generated from a medical linear accelerator; strongly competing with the current solid state detectors, all achieved at low bias voltages (−10 V) and low power, enabling detector operation powered by coin cell batteries.

1 October 2008 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTCarolyn W. Taylor
Carolyn W. Taylor
JPJulie M. Povall
Julie M. Povall
PMPaul McGale
Paul McGale
ANAndrew Nisbet
Andrew Nisbet
DDDavid Dodwell
David Dodwell
SDSarah C. Darby
Sarah C. Darby