Objectives (1) To evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy (5–9 medicines) and excessive polypharmacy (10+ medicines) and (2) to determine associated demographic and clinical characteristics in an ageing population with intellectual disabilities (IDs). Design Observational cross-sectional study. Setting Wave One (2009/2010) of the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA). Participants A nationally representative sample of 753 persons with ID, aged between 41 and 90 years. Participants/proxy reported medicines (prescription and over the counter) taken on a regular basis; medication data was available for 736 participants (98%). Main outcome measures/interventions Participants were divided into those with no polypharmacy (0–4 medicines), polypharmacy (5–9 medicines) and excessive polypharmacy (10+ medicines). Medication use patterns were analysed according to demographic variables and reported chronic conditions. A multinomial logistic regression model identified factors associated with polypharmacy (5–9 medicines) and excessive polypharmacy (≥10 medicines). Results Overall, 90% of participants reported use of medicines. Polypharmacy was observed in 31.5% of participants and excessive polypharmacy in 20.1%. Living in a residential institution, and reporting a mental health or neurological condition were strongly associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy after adjusting for confounders, but age or gender had no significant effect. Conclusions Polypharmacy was commonplace for older adults with ID and may be partly explained by the high prevalence of multimorbidity reported. Review of appropriateness of medication use is essential, as polypharmacy places ageing people with ID at risk of adverse effects.
Oral candidosis has become an increasingly important problem in HIV-infected individuals. At present, the small body of published literature on the characterization of the Candida strains and species found in HIV+ patients is full of confusion and contradictions. Some of these difficulties are the result of the methodological shortcomings of a number of the techniques that have been used. Examples of the problems that may be encountered on primary isolation and subculture are described and the drawbacks associated with the systems used to date for phenotyping Candidaare quoted. While molecular characterization techniques would appear to offer a reliable and objective alternative, they too have their strengths and weaknesses. An attempt is made to summarize the progress that has been made recently in the detection and identification of Candida albicansand also the non-albicans species from HIV-infected individuals. What emerges is that the commensal Candida species that inhabit the oral cavities of HIV+ patients are subjected to a number of significant pressures that probably promote the selection of organisms with unusual phenotypes and genotypes. These Candida are more difficult to characterize and behave differently compared to their counterparts in HIV-individuals. It is clear that uncovering the factors that are important for the selection of treatment regimens and will be predictive of outcome will not be easy. Candida organisms are neither as benign nor as simple as once thought.