Roozbeh Moazenzadeh

Dr. Roozbeh Moazenzadeh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRoozbeh Moazenzadeh
Roozbeh Moazenzadeh
BMBabak Mohammadi
Babak Mohammadi
SSShahaboddin Shamshirband
Shahaboddin Shamshirband
KCKwok-Wing Chau
Kwok-Wing Chau
Evaporation accounts for varying shares of water balance under different climatic conditions, and its correct prediction poses a significant challenge before water resources management in watersheds. Given the complex and nonlinear behavior of the evaporation component, and according to the fact that this parameter is not measured at many meteorological stations, at least during some timeframes, and that the meteorological stations measuring this component are not properly distributed in many developing countries, including Iran, the main objective of this work was to predict the evaporation component at two meteorological stations (Rasht and Lahijan) located in Gilan province in northern Iran over the 2006–2016 time period. To that end, those meteorological parameters recorded at the two stations which had the highest impact on evaporation prediction were identified using Pearson correlation coefficient. Selected parameters were then used, under separate scenarios, as inputs to support vector regression (SVR) and SVR model coupled with firefly algorithm (SVR-FA) in order to simulate evaporation values on a daily scale. Evaporation amounts showed the highest correlation with net solar radiation and saturation vapor pressure deficit at Lahijan and Rasht stations, respectively. Root mean square error values of evaporation prediction at testing phase of SVR and SVR-FA ranged from 1.05 to 1.43 and 1.02 to 1.31 mm, respectively, at Lahijan station and from 1.02 to 1.28 and 0.88 to 1.17 mm, respectively, at Rasht station for various scenarios. For underpredicted evaporation data set, the magnitude of RMSE reduction from SVR1 to SVR7 was 27% at Lahijan and 18% at Rasht station; whereas RMSE decrement from SVR-FA1 to SVR-FA7 was 18 and 26 percent at Lahijan and Rasht stations, respectively. This means that for the underpredicted data set, the role of increasing the number of SVR and SVR-FA input parameters in decreasing evaporation prediction error has been more conspicuous at Lahijan and Rasht stations, respectively. Analysis of SVR and SVR-FA performance at various 2-mm intervals of measured evaporation showed that prediction error has generally been increasing with increment of evaporation values, with the highest errors observed at the 8-10 mm interval for both Lahijan and Rasht stations (error rates of 3.42 and 2.42 mm/day at Lahijan and 6.13 and 5.84 mm/day at Rasht station, with SVR1 and SVR-FA1 models, respectively).

1 March 2021 in CATENA
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBabak Mohammadi
Babak Mohammadi
YGYiqing Guan
Yiqing Guan
RMRoozbeh Moazenzadeh
Roozbeh Moazenzadeh
MSMir-Jafar-Sadegh Safari
Mir-Jafar-Sadegh Safari

1 November 2019 in Geoderma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRoozbeh Moazenzadeh
Roozbeh Moazenzadeh
BMBabak Mohammadi
Babak Mohammadi

28 July 2021 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BMBabak Mohammadi
Babak Mohammadi
RMRoozbeh Moazenzadeh
Roozbeh Moazenzadeh
KCKevin Christian
Kevin Christian
Zheng DuanZheng Duan
Zheng Duan

17 March 2021 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMBabak Mohammadi
Babak Mohammadi
RMRoozbeh Moazenzadeh
Roozbeh Moazenzadeh
Solar radiation (Rs) is one of the main parameters controlling the energy balance at the Earth’s surface and plays a major role in evapotranspiration and plant growth, snow melting, and environmental studies. This work aimed at evaluating the performance of seven empirical models in estimating daily solar radiation over 1990–2004 (calibration) and 2004–2010 (validation) at 13 Peruvian meteorological stations. With the same variables used in empirical models (temperature) as well as two other parameters, namely precipitation and relative humidity, new models were developed by multiple linear regression analysis (proposed models). In calibration of empirical models with the same variables, the lowest estimation errors were 227.1 and 236.3 J·cm−2·day−1 at Tacna and Puno stations, and the highest errors were 3958.4 and 3005.7 at San Ramon and Junin stations, respectively. The poorest-performing empirical models greatly overestimated Rs at most stations. The best performance of a proposed model (in terms of percentage of error reduction) was 73% compared to the average of all empirical models and 93% relative to the poorest result of empirical models, both at San Ramon station. According to root mean square errors (RMSEs) of proposed models, the worst and the best results are achieved at San Martin station (RMSE = 508.8 J·cm−2·day−1) and Tacna station (RMSE = 223.2 J·cm−2·day−1), respectively.

1 January 2022 in Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BMBabak Mohammadi
Babak Mohammadi
RMRoozbeh Moazenzadeh
Roozbeh Moazenzadeh
QPQuoc Bao Pham
Quoc Bao Pham
Nadhir Al-AnsariNadhir Al-Ansari
Nadhir Al-Ansari
Khalil Ur RahmanKhalil Ur Rahman
Khalil Ur Rahman
ZDZheng Duan
Zheng Duan