Livia Livinț-Popa

Dr. Livia Livinț-Popa


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 February 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dafin Fior MuresanuDafin Fior Muresanu
Dafin Fior Muresanu
LLLivia Livinț-Popa
Livia Livinț-Popa
DCDiana Chira
Diana Chira
VDVictor Dabala
Victor Dabala
Elian HapcaElian Hapca
Elian Hapca
MBMichael Brainin
Michael Brainin
Stroke is still a significant health problem that affects millions of people worldwide, as it is the second-leading cause of death and the third-leading cause of disability. Many changes have occurred in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Although the innovative concepts of neuroprotection and neurorecovery have been vigorously investigated in a substantial number of clinical studies in the past, only a few trials managed to increase the number of promising outcomes with regard to the multidimensional construct of brain protection and rehabilitation. In terms of pharmacological therapies with proven benefits in the post-ischemic process, drugs with neurorestorative properties are thought to be effective in both the acute and chronic phases of stroke. One significant example is Cerebrolysin, a combination of amino acids and peptides that mimic the biological functions of neurotrophic factors, which has been shown to improve outcomes after ischemic stroke, while preserving a promising safety profile. The purpose of this paper is to offer an overview on the role and impact of Cerebrolysin for ischemic stroke care, by touching on various aspects, from its complex, multimodal and pleiotropic mechanism of action, to its efficacy and safety, as well as cost effectiveness.

4 November 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NDNicu Catalin Draghici
Nicu Catalin Draghici
VVVitalie Vacaras
Vitalie Vacaras
RBRoxana Bolchis
Roxana Bolchis
ABAtamyrat Bashimov
Atamyrat Bashimov
DDDiana Maria Domnița
Diana Maria Domnița
Dafin Fior MuresanuDafin Fior Muresanu
Dafin Fior Muresanu
Entrapment neuropathies of the lower limb are a misunderstood and underdiagnosed group of disorders, characterized by pain and dysesthesia, muscular weakness, and specific provoking movements on physical examination. The most frequent of these syndromes encountered in clinical practice are fibular nerve entrapment, proximal tibial neuropathy, sural nerve neuropathy, deep gluteal syndrome or sciatic nerve entrapment, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve entrapment, also known as meralgia paresthetica. These are commonly mistaken for lumbar plexopathies, radiculopathies, and musculotendinous diseases, which appear even more frequently and have overlapping clinical presentations. A comprehensive anamnesis, physical examination, and electrodiagnostic studies should help clarify the diagnosis. If the diagnosis is still unclear or a secondary cause of entrapment is suspected, magnetic resonance neurography, MRI, or ultrasonography should be conducted to clarify the etiology, rule out other diseases, and confirm the diagnosis. The aim of this narrative review was to help clinicians gain familiarity with this disease, with an increase in diagnostic confidence, leading to early diagnosis of nerve damage and prevention of muscle atrophy. We reviewed the epidemiology, anatomy, pathophysiology, etiology, clinical presentation, and EDX technique and interpretation of the entrapment neuropathies of the lower limb, using articles published from 1970 to 2022 included in the Pubmed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases.

23 December 2022 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLivia Livinț-Popa
Livia Livinț-Popa
DCDiana Chira
Diana Chira
VDVictor Dabala
Victor Dabala
Elian HapcaElian Hapca
Elian Hapca
BPBogdan Ovidiu Popescu
Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu
Dafin Fior MuresanuDafin Fior Muresanu
Dafin Fior Muresanu
Introduction: Post-stroke depression (PSD) has complex pathophysiology determined by various biological and psychological factors. Although it is a long-term complication of stroke, PSD is often underdiagnosed. Given the diagnostic role of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) in depression, it was investigated whether a possible marker of PSD could be identified by observing the evolution of the (Delta + Theta)/(Alpha + Beta) Ratio (DTABR), respectively the Delta/Alpha Ratio (DAR) values in post-stroke depressed patients (evaluated through the HADS-D subscale). Methods: The current paper analyzed the data of 57 patients initially selected from a randomized control trial (RCT) that assessed the role of N-Pep 12 in stroke rehabilitation. EEG recordings from the original trial database were analyzed using signal processing techniques, respecting the conditions (eyes open, eyes closed), and several cognitive tasks. Results: We observed two significant associations between the DTABR values and the HADS-D scores of post-stroke depressed patients for each of the two visits (V1 and V2) of the N-Pep 12 trial. We recorded the relationships in the Global (V1 = 30 to 120 days after stroke) and Frontal Extended (V2 = 90 days after stroke) regions during cognitive tasks that trained attention and working memory. For the second visit, the association between the analyzed variables was negative. Conclusions: As both our relationships were described during the cognitive condition, we can state that the neural networks involved in processing attention and working memory might go through a reorganization process one to four months after the stroke onset. After a period longer than six months, the process could localize itself at the level of frontal regions, highlighting a possible divergence between the local frontal dynamics and the subjective well-being of stroke survivors. QEEG parameters linked to stroke progression evolution (like DAR or DTABR) can facilitate the identification of the most common neuropsychiatric complication in stroke survivors.

13 July 2020 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPCristina Pantelemon
Cristina Pantelemon
VNVioleta Necula
Violeta Necula
ABAlexandra-Stefania Berghe
Alexandra-Stefania Berghe
LLLivia Livinț-Popa
Livia Livinț-Popa
SPSteluța Palade
Steluța Palade
Dafin Fior MuresanuDafin Fior Muresanu
Dafin Fior Muresanu
Background and objectives: The cochlear implant is not only meant to restore auditory function, but it also has a series of benefits on the psychomotor development and on the maturation of central auditory pathways. In this study, with the help of neuropsychological tests and cortical auditory potentials (CAEPs), we intend to identify a series of instruments that allow us to monitor children with a cochlear implant, and later on, to admit them into an individualized rehabilitation program. Materials and methods: This is a longitudinal study containing 17 subjects (6 boys and 11 girls) diagnosed with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. The average age for cochlear implantation in our cohort is 22 months old. Each child was tested before the cochlear implantation, tested again 3 months after the implant, and then 6 months after the implant. To test the general development, we used the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST II). CAEPs were recorded to assess the maturation of central auditory pathways. Results: The results showed there was progress in both general development and language development, with a significant statistical difference between the overall DQ (developmental quotient) and language DQ before the cochlear implantation and three and six months later, respectively. Similarly, CAEP measurements revealed a decrease of positive-going component (P1) latency after cochlear implantation. Conclusion: CAEPs and neuropsychological tests prove to be useful instruments for monitoring the progress in patients with cochlear implants during the rehabilitation process.

11 October 2023 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
NDNicu Catalin Draghici
Nicu Catalin Draghici
VVVitalie Vacaras
Vitalie Vacaras
RBRoxana Bolchis
Roxana Bolchis
ABAtamyrat Bashimov
Atamyrat Bashimov
DDDiana Maria Domnița
Diana Maria Domnița
Dafin Fior MuresanuDafin Fior Muresanu
Dafin Fior Muresanu
Entrapment neuropathies of the lower limb are a misunderstood and underdiagnosed group of disorders, characterized by pain and dysesthesia, muscular weakness, and specific provoking movements on physical examination. The most frequent of these syndromes encountered in clinical practice are fibular nerve entrapment, proximal tibial neuropathy, sural nerve neuropathy, deep gluteal syndrome or sciatic nerve entrapment and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve entrapment, also known as meralgia paresthetica. They are commonly mistaken for lumbar plexopathies, radiculopathies, and musculotendinous diseases, which appear even more frequently and have overlapping clinical presentations. A comprehensive anamnesis, physical examination, and electrodiagnostic studies should help clarify the diagnosis. If the diagnosis is still unclear or a secondary cause of entrapment is suspected, magnetic resonance neurography, MRI or ultrasonography should be conducted to clarify the etiology, rule out other diseases and confirm the diagnosis. Moreover, clinicians should gain familiarity with this disease and their diagnostic confidence should increase, leading to early diagnosis of nerve damage and prevention of muscle atrophy. The reviewed and updated epidemiology, anatomy, pathophysiology, etiology, clinical presentation and EDX technique and interpretation of the entrapment neuropathies of the lower limb are further described in this article.

5 November 2022
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
DMDafin F. Muresanu
Dafin F. Muresanu
OROlivia Verisezan Rosu
Olivia Verisezan Rosu
CBCodruta Birle
Codruta Birle
LLLivia Livinț-Popa
Livia Livinț-Popa
DCDiana Chira
Diana Chira
ABAnca Dana Buzoianu
Anca Dana Buzoianu