Sylwester Rogula

Mr. Sylwester Rogula

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BRBartosz Rolek
Bartosz Rolek
MHMateusz Haber
Mateusz Haber
MGMagdalena Gajewska
Magdalena Gajewska
SRSylwester Rogula
Sylwester Rogula
APArkadiusz Pietrasik
Arkadiusz Pietrasik
Aleksandra GąseckaAleksandra Gąsecka
Aleksandra Gąsecka
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1-R) agonists are novel therapeutic agents used for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recently, large-scale randomized clinical trials have been conducted to assess the cardiovascular safety of these medications. The findings of these trials have revealed that both SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1-R agonists exhibit favorable cardioprotective effects, including reduction in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, a decreased risk of chronic kidney disease progression, a decrease in hospitalization for heart failure (HF), an effect shown by SGLT2 inhibitors, and stroke prevention, an effect shown by GLP-1-R agonists. Based on the results from above studies, the European and American Diabetes Associations have issued new recommendations strongly endorsing the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1-R agonists in combination with metformin for patients with T2DM who have additional cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities or risk factors. The primary aim of this combined therapy is to prevent CV events. Although both medication groups offer beneficial effects, they demonstrate slightly different profiles. SGLT2 inhibitors have exhibited better effects regarding a reduced incidence of HF, whereas GLP-1-R agonists have shown a reduced risk of CV events, particularly stroke. Moreover, recent European Society of Cardiology as well as American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines of HF treatment stressed the importance of SGLT2 inhibitor administration in patients with HF regardless of T2DM. In this context, we present and discuss the outcomes of the most recent trials investigating the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1-R agonists on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients, both with and without T2DM. Additionally, we explore the synergistic effects of combining SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1-R agonists in patients with cardiovascular disease.

11 January 2021 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Aleksandra GąseckaAleksandra Gąsecka
Aleksandra Gąsecka
SRSylwester Rogula
Sylwester Rogula
Lukasz SzarpakLukasz Szarpak
Lukasz Szarpak
Krzysztof J. FilipiakKrzysztof J. Filipiak
Krzysztof J. Filipiak
Atherosclerosis and its complications, including acute coronary syndromes, are the major cause of death worldwide. The two most important pathophysiological mechanisms underlying atherosclerosis include increased platelet activation and increased low-density lipoproteins (LDL) concentration. In contrast to LDL, oxidized (ox)-LDL have direct pro-thrombotic properties by functional interactions with platelets, leading to platelet activation and favoring thrombus formation. In this review, we summarize the currently available evidence on the interactions between LDL-cholesterol and platelets, which are based on (i) the presence of ox-LDL-binding sites on platelets, (ii) generation of ox-LDL by platelets and (iii) the role of activated platelets and ox-LDL in atherosclerosis. In addition, we elaborate on the clinical implications of these interactions, including development of the new therapeutic possibilities. The ability to understand and modulate mechanisms governing interactions between LDL-cholesterol and platelets may offer new treatment strategies for atherosclerosis prevention.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Aleksandra GąseckaAleksandra Gąsecka
Aleksandra Gąsecka
MBMarta Banaszkiewicz
Marta Banaszkiewicz
RNRienk Nieuwland
Rienk Nieuwland
EPEdwin van der Pol
Edwin van der Pol
NHNajat Hajji
Najat Hajji
Marcin Kurzyna, MD, PhD, FESCMarcin Kurzyna, MD, PhD, FESC
Marcin Kurzyna, MD, PhD, FESC
(1) Background: Prostacyclin analogues (epoprostenol, treprostinil, and iloprost) induce vasodilation in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) but also inhibit platelet function. (2) Objectives: We assessed platelet function in PAH patients treated with prostacyclin analogues and not receiving prostacyclin analogues. (3) Methods: Venous blood was collected from 42 patients treated with prostacyclin analogues (49.5 ± 15.9 years, 81% female) and 38 patients not receiving prostacyclin analogues (55.5 ± 15.6 years, 74% female). Platelet reactivity was analyzed by impedance aggregometry using arachidonic acid (AA; 0.5 mM), adenosine diphosphate (ADP; 6.5 µM), and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP; 32 µM) as agonists. In a subset of patients, concentrations of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from all platelets (CD61+), activated platelets (CD61+/CD62P+), leukocytes (CD45+), and endothelial cells (CD146+) were analyzed by flow cytometry. Platelet-rich thrombus formation was measured using a whole blood perfusion system. (4) Results: Compared to controls, PAH patients treated with prostacyclin analogues had lower platelet reactivity in response to AA and ADP (p = 0.01 for both), lower concentrations of platelet and leukocyte EVs (p ≤ 0.04), delayed thrombus formation (p ≤ 0.003), and decreased thrombus size (p = 0.008). Epoprostenol did not affect platelet reactivity but decreased the concentrations of platelet and leukocyte EVs (p ≤ 0.04). Treprostinil decreased platelet reactivity in response to AA and ADP (p ≤ 0.02) but had no effect on the concentrations of EVs. All prostacyclin analogues delayed thrombus formation and decreased thrombus size (p ≤ 0.04). (5) Conclusions: PAH patients treated with prostacyclin analogues had impaired platelet reactivity, EV release, and thrombus formation, compared to patients not receiving prostacyclin analogues.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Michail KoutentakisMichail Koutentakis
Michail Koutentakis
Stanisław SurmaStanisław Surma
Stanisław Surma
SRSylwester Rogula
Sylwester Rogula
Krzysztof J. FilipiakKrzysztof J. Filipiak
Krzysztof J. Filipiak
Aleksandra GąseckaAleksandra Gąsecka
Aleksandra Gąsecka
The vegan diet, often known as a plant-rich diet, consists primarily of plant-based meals. This dietary approach may be beneficial to one’s health and the environment and is valuable to the immune system. Plants provide vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, and antioxidants, components that promote cell survival and immune function, allowing its defensive mechanisms to work effectively. The term “vegan diet” comprises a range of eating patterns that prioritize nutrient-rich foods such as fruits and vegetables, legumes, whole grains, nuts, and seeds. In comparison to omnivorous diets, which are often lower in such products, the vegan diet has been favorably connected with changes in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers such as reduced body mass index (BMI) values, total serum cholesterol, serum glucose, inflammation, and blood pressure. Reduced intake of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), saturated fat, processed meat, and greater consumption of fiber and phytonutrients may improve cardiovascular health. However, vegans have much smaller amounts of nutrients such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), selenium, zinc, iodine, and vitamin B12, compared to non-vegans, which may lead to detrimental cardiovascular effects. This review aims to present the effect of plant-based diets (PBDs), specifically vegan diets, on the cardiovascular system.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Aleksandra GąseckaAleksandra Gąsecka
Aleksandra Gąsecka
SRSylwester Rogula
Sylwester Rogula
CECeren Eyileten
Ceren Eyileten
MPMarek Postula
Marek Postula
Miłosz JaguszewskiMiłosz Jaguszewski
Miłosz Jaguszewski
Krzysztof J. FilipiakKrzysztof J. Filipiak
Krzysztof J. Filipiak
Platelet extracellular vesicles (PEVs) are potential new biomarkers of platelet activation which may allow us to predict and/or diagnose developing coronary thrombosis before myocardial necrosis occurs. The P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors play a key role in platelet activation and aggregation. Whereas the P2Y1 antagonists are at the preclinical stage, at present, the P2Y12 antagonists are the most effective treatment strategy to prevent stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite an increasing number of publications on PEVs, the mechanisms underlying their formation, including the role of purinergic receptors in this process, remain an active research field. Here, we outline the clinical relevance of PEVs in cardiovascular disease, summarize the role and downstream signalling of P2Y receptors in platelet activation, and discuss the available evidence regarding their role in PEV formation.

SRSylwester Rogula
Sylwester Rogula
Aleksandra GąseckaAleksandra Gąsecka
Aleksandra Gąsecka
Tomasz MazurekTomasz Mazurek
Tomasz Mazurek
ENEliano Pio Navarese
Eliano Pio Navarese
Lukasz SzarpakLukasz Szarpak
Lukasz Szarpak
Krzysztof J. FilipiakKrzysztof J. Filipiak
Krzysztof J. Filipiak
The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing due to the aging of the population and multiplication of risk factors, such as hypertension, arteriosclerosis and obesity. Impaired renal function increases both the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. There are two groups of orally administered drugs to prevent thromboembolic events in patients with CKD who require anticoagulation: vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Although VKAs remain the first-line treatment in patients with advanced CKD, treatment with VKAs is challenging due to difficulties in maintaining the appropriate anticoagulation level, tendency to accelerate vascular calcification and faster progression of CKD in patients treated with VKAs. On the other hand, the pleiotropic effect of DOACs, including vascular protection and anti-inflammatory properties along with comparable efficacy and safety of treatment with DOACs, compared to VKAs observed in preliminary reports encourages the use of DOACs in patients with CKD. This review summarizes the available data on the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with CKD and provides recommendations regarding the choice of the optimal drug and dosage depending on the CKD stage.