Beta-lactam antibiotics (βLA) are the most commonly used antibiotics in the intensive care unit (ICU). ICU patients present many pathophysiological features that cause pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) specificities, leading to the risk of underdosage. The French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) have joined forces to provide guidelines on the optimization of beta-lactam treatment in ICU patients. A consensus committee of 18 experts from the two societies had the mission of producing these guidelines. The entire process was conducted independently of any industry funding. A list of questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) was drawn-up by the experts. Then, two bibliographic experts analysed the literature published since January 2000 using predefined keywords according to PRISMA recommendations. The quality of the data identified from the literature was assessed using the GRADE® methodology. Due to the lack of powerful studies having used mortality as main judgement criteria, it was decided, before drafting the recommendations, to formulate only “optional” recommendations. After two rounds of rating and one amendment, a strong agreement was reached by the SFPT-SFAR guideline panel for 21 optional recommendations and a recapitulative algorithm for care covering four areas: (i) pharmacokinetic variability, (ii) PK-PD relationship, (iii) administration modalities, and (iv) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The most important recommendations regarding βLA administration in ICU patients concerned (i) the consideration of the many sources of PK variability in this population; (ii) the definition of free plasma concentration between four and eight times the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the causative bacteria for 100% of the dosing interval as PK-PD target to maximize bacteriological and clinical responses; (iii) the use of continuous or prolonged administration of βLA in the most severe patients, in case of high MIC bacteria and in case of lower respiratory tract infection to improve clinical cure; and (iv) the use of TDM to improve PK-PD target achievement. The experts strongly suggest the use of personalized dosing, continuous or prolonged infusion and therapeutic drug monitoring when administering βLA in critically ill patients.
Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are widely used for the treatment of hematological malignancies or autoimmune disease but may be responsible for a secondary humoral deficiency. In the context of COVID-19 infection, this may prevent the elicitation of a specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody response. We report a series of 17 consecutive patients with profound B-cell lymphopenia and prolonged COVID-19 symptoms, negative immunoglobulin G (IgG)-IgM SARS-CoV-2 serology, and positive RNAemia measured by digital polymerase chain reaction who were treated with 4 units of COVID-19 convalescent plasma. Within 48 hours of transfusion, all but 1 patient experienced an improvement of clinical symptoms. The inflammatory syndrome abated within a week. Only 1 patient who needed mechanical ventilation for severe COVID-19 disease died of bacterial pneumonia. SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia decreased to below the sensitivity threshold in all 9 evaluated patients. In 3 patients, virus-specific T-cell responses were analyzed using T-cell enzyme-linked immunospot assay before convalescent plasma transfusion. All showed a maintained SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response and poor cross-response to other coronaviruses. No adverse event was reported. Convalescent plasma with anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies appears to be a very promising approach in the context of protracted COVID-19 symptoms in patients unable to mount a specific humoral response to SARS-CoV-2.
Background: SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for high morbidity and mortality worldwide, mostly due to the exacerbated inflammatory response observed in critically ill patients. However, little is known about the kinetics of the systemic immune response and its association with survival in SARS-CoV-2+ patients admitted in ICU. We aimed to compare the immuno-inflammatory features according to organ failure severity and in-ICU mortality. Methods: Six-week multicentre study ( N = 3) including SARS-CoV-2+ patients admitted in ICU. Analysis of plasma biomarkers at days 0 and 3–4 according to organ failure worsening (increase in SOFA score) and 60-day mortality. Results: 101 patients were included. Patients had severe respiratory diseases with PaO2/FiO2 of 155 [111–251] mmHg), SAPS II of 37 [31–45] and SOFA score of 4 [3–7]. Eighty-three patients (83%) required endotracheal intubation/mechanical ventilation and among them, 64% were treated with prone position. IL-1β was barely detectable. Baseline IL-6 levels positively correlated with organ failure severity. Baseline IL-6 and CRP levels were significantly higher in patients in the worsening group than in the non-worsening group (278 [70–622] vs. 71 [29–153] pg/mL, P < 0.01; and 178 [100–295] vs. 100 [37–213] mg/L, P < 0.05, respectively). Baseline IL-6 and CRP levels were significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors but fibrinogen levels and lymphocyte counts were not different between groups. After adjustment on SOFA score and time from symptom onset to first dosage, IL-6 and CRP remained significantly associated with mortality. IL-6 changes between Day 0 and Day 3–4 were not different according to the outcome. A contrario , kinetics of CRP and lymphocyte count were different between survivors and non-survivors. Conclusions: In SARS-CoV-2+ patients admitted in ICU, a systemic pro-inflammatory signature was associated with clinical worsening and 60-day mortality.
Independent bench studies using specific ventilation scenarios allow testing of the performance of ventilators in conditions similar to clinical settings. The aims of this study were to determine the accuracy of the latest generation ventilators to deliver chosen parameters in various typical conditions and to provide clinicians with a comprehensive report on their performance. Thirteen modern intensive care unit ventilators were evaluated on the ASL5000 test lung with and without leakage for: (i) accuracy to deliver exact tidal volume (Vt) and PEEP in assist-control ventilation (ACV); (ii) performance of trigger and pressurization in pressure support ventilation (PSV); and (iii) quality of non-invasive ventilation algorithms. In ACV, only six ventilators delivered an accurate Vt and nine an accurate PEEP. Eleven devices failed to compensate Vt and four the PEEP in leakage conditions. Inspiratory delays differed significantly among ventilators in invasive PSV (range 75–149 ms, P=0.03) and non-invasive PSV (range 78–165 ms, P<0.001). The percentage of the ideal curve (concomitantly evaluating the pressurization speed and the levels of pressure reached) also differed significantly (range 57–86% for invasive PSV, P=0.04; and 60–90% for non-invasive PSV, P<0.001). Non-invasive ventilation algorithms efficiently prevented the decrease in pressurization capacities and PEEP levels induced by leaks in, respectively, 10 and 12 out of the 13 ventilators. We observed real heterogeneity of performance amongst the latest generation of intensive care unit ventilators. Although non-invasive ventilation algorithms appear to maintain adequate pressurization efficiently in the case of leakage, basic functions, such as delivered Vt in ACV and pressurization in PSV, are often less reliable than the values displayed by the device suggest.
Objectives: Alveolar macrophage polarization and role on alveolar repair during human acute respiratory distress syndrome remain unclear. This study aimed to determine during human acute respiratory distress syndrome: the alveolar macrophage polarization, the effect of alveolar environment on macrophage polarization, and the role of polarized macrophages on epithelial repair. Design: Experimental ex vivo and in vitro investigations. Setting: Four ICUs in three teaching hospitals. Patients: Thirty-three patients with early moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome were enrolled for assessment of the polarization of alveolar macrophages. Interventions: Polarization of acute respiratory distress syndrome macrophages was studied by flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Modulation of macrophage polarization was studied in vitro using phenotypic and functional readouts. Macrophage effect on repair was studied using alveolar epithelial cells in wound healing models. Measurements and Main Results: Ex vivo, alveolar macrophages from early acute respiratory distress syndrome patients exhibited anti-inflammatory characteristics with high CD163 expression and interleukin-10 production. Accordingly, early acute respiratory distress syndrome-bronchoalveolar lavage fluid drives an acute respiratory distress syndrome–specific anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization in vitro, close to that induced by recombinant interleukin-10. Culture supernatants from macrophages polarized in vitro with acute respiratory distress syndrome-bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or interleukin-10 and ex vivo acute respiratory distress syndrome alveolar macrophages specifically promoted lung epithelial repair. Inhibition of the hepatocyte growth factor pathway in epithelial cells and hepatocyte growth factor production in macrophages both reversed this effect. Finally, hepatocyte growth factor and soluble form of CD163 concentrations expressed relatively to macrophage count were higher in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors. Conclusions: Early acute respiratory distress syndrome alveolar environment drives an anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization favoring epithelial repair through activation of the hepatocyte growth factor pathway. These results suggest that macrophage polarization may be an important step for epithelial repair and acute respiratory distress syndrome recovery.