Rachel Hargest

Dr. Rachel Hargest


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 December 2018 in Colorectal Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBS. R. Brown
S. R. Brown
NFN. S. Fearnhead
N. S. Fearnhead
OFO. D. Faiz
O. D. Faiz
JAJ. F. Abercrombie
J. F. Abercrombie
AAA. G. Acheson
A. G. Acheson
ACACPGBI IBD Surgery Consensus Collaboration
ACPGBI IBD Surgery Consensus Collaboration
Aim: There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology.Methods: Surgeons who are members of theACPGBIwith a recognised interest inIBDwere invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines.Results: All aspects of surgical care forIBDhave been included along with 157 recommendations for management.Conclusion: These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management ofIBDand will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.

4 June 2014 in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAlexandra Teagle
Alexandra Teagle
RHRachel Hargest
Rachel Hargest
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an uncommon ulcerative skin disease often associated with underlying systemic diseases. Its pathogenesis is unknown, although immune pathways have been implicated. Targeted therapy is therefore lacking and currently treatment is largely empirical and consists of corticosteroids and ciclosporin first line. This paper reviews the current and emerging knowledge about PG. PG occurs with an incidence of 3–10 per million per year. The ulcers are exquisitely painful and characteristically have a necrotic centre with irregular overhanging bluish borders. Around half of cases are associated with underlying systemic disease, most commonly inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis and haematological malignancies; the remaining cases are idiopathic. The pathogenesis is unknown, but the most widely supported theory is immunological, and biopsies of lesions show a predominantly neutrophilic infiltrate. Several aberrant immune processes have been described, with neutrophils and their recruitment to sites of inflammation by cytokines taking an apparently important role. Topical and systemic therapies are both vital aspects of treatment, and in recent years, immune modulators have been used with increasing success, with an emerging role for anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha agents such as the monoclonal antibody infliximab. Although uncommon, PG causes significant morbidity to those it affects. Further research is needed into the disease pathogenesis, and adequate targeted treatment.

27 September 2014 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KJKe Ji
Ke Ji
Lin YeLin Ye
Lin Ye
FRFiona Ruge
Fiona Ruge
RHRachel Hargest
Rachel Hargest
MMMalcolm D Mason
Malcolm D Mason
Wen G. JiangWen G. Jiang
Wen G. Jiang
Kiss-1 and Kiss-1R have been suggested as a novel pair of metastasis suppressors for several human solid tumours, however, their role in colorectal cancer remains largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the role and signal transduction of Kiss-1 and Kiss-1R in colorectal cancer. Ribozyme transgenes were used to knockdown high expression of Kiss-1 and Kiss-1R in HT115 and HRT18 cells. The stabilized transfected cells were then used to deduce the influence of Kiss-1 and Kiss-1R on the function of colorectal cancer cells by in vitro assays and ECIS assay. The effect of Kiss-1 on MMPs related to tumour metastasis was also deleted by zymography. The mRNA and protein expression of Kiss-1 and Kiss-1R, and their correlation to the clinical outcome in human colorectal cancer were investigated using real-time PCR and IHC respectively. Knocking down Kiss-1 resulted in increased invasion and migration of colorectal cancer cells. Kisspeptin-10 decreased cellular migration of colorectal cancer cells and required ERK signaling as shown during the ECIS based analyses. Reduction of MMP-9 was caused by Kisspeptin-10 and ERK inhibitor, shown by zymography. In human colorectal cancer tissues, the mRNA expression level of Kiss-1 had a negative correlation with Dukes staging, TNM staging, tumour size and lymph node involvement. Reduction of Kiss-1R was also linked to poor prognosis for the patients. The present study has presented evidence that Kiss-1 may be a putative metastasis suppressor molecule in human colorectal cancer.

3 October 2024 in BMJ Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MIMartilord Ifeanyichi
Martilord Ifeanyichi
JLJose Luis Mosso Lara
Jose Luis Mosso Lara
PTPhyllis Tenkorang
Phyllis Tenkorang
MKMeskerem Aleka Kebede
Meskerem Aleka Kebede
MBMaeve Bognini
Maeve Bognini
RFRocco Friebel
Rocco Friebel
Background Cost-effectiveness evidence is a critical tool to support resource allocation decisions. There is growing recognition that the development of benefit packages for surgical care should be guided by such evidence, particularly in resource-constraint settings. Methods We conducted a systematic review of evidence (Medline, Embase, Global Health, EconLit and grey literature) on the cost-effectiveness of surgery across low-income and middle-income countries published between January 2013 and January 2023. We included studies with minor and major therapeutic surgeries and minimally invasive intraluminal and endovascular interventions. We computed and compared the average cost-effectiveness ratios (ACERs) for different surgical interventions to the respective national gross domestic product per capita to determine cost-effectiveness and to common traditional public health interventions. Results We identified 87 unique studies out of 20 070 articles screened. Studies spanned 23 countries, with China (n=20), Thailand (n=12), Brazil (n=8) and Iran (n=8) accounting for about 55% of the evidence. Overall, the median ACERs across procedure groups ranged from I$17/disability-adjusted life year (DALY) for laparotomies to I$170 186/DALY for bariatric surgeries. Most of the ACER estimates were classified as cost-effective (89%) or very cost-effective (76%). Low-complexity surgical interventions compared favourably to common public health interventions. Conclusion These findings reinforce the growing body of evidence that investments in surgery are economically smart. There remains however paucity of high-quality evidence that would allow decision-makers to assess the comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery and to determine best buys across a wide range of specialties and interventions. A concerted effort is needed to advance the generation and utilisation of economic evidence in the drive towards scale-up of surgical care across low-income and middle-income countries.

2 November 2020 in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRachel Hargest
Rachel Hargest
Summary: Surgeons and their patients recognise that one of the major advances in surgical technique over the last 20 years has been the growth of minimal access surgery by means of laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Partnerships with industry have facilitated the development of advanced technical instruments, light sources, recording devices and optics which are almost out of date by the time they are introduced to surgical practice. However, lest we think that technological innovation is entirely a modern concept, we should remember that our predecessors were masters of their craft and able to apply new technologies to surgical practice. The history of minimal access surgery can be traced back to approximately 5000 years ago and this review aims to remind us of the achievements of historical doctors and engineers, as well as bring more modern developments to wider attention. This review will comprise a three-part series: Part I 3000BC to 1850 Early instruments for viewing body cavities Part II 1850 to 1990 Technological developments Part III 1990 to present Organisational issues and the rise of the robots

2 November 2020 in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRachel Hargest
Rachel Hargest
Summary This is the second of a three-part series that charts the history of minimal access surgery from antiquity to current times. Although rapid developments in laparoscopic and robotic surgery have transformed surgical care over the last 30 years, our predecessors made significant advances in their time which set the principles for modern practice. Part I of this series described how ancient medical practitioners developed simple instruments, from metal or wood, for viewing body cavities. Improvements in the use of metal, glass and lighting allowed for inspection of deeper parts of the body. This second part of the series will show how advances in electrical technology allowed the development of improved lighting for endoscopy and laparoscopy along with the use of electrocautery for a wide range of therapeutic procedures.