Vemurafenib and dabrafenib are BRAF kinase inhibitors (BRAFi) used for the treatment of patients with melanoma carrying the V600E BRAF mutation. However, melanoma cells develop resistance to both drugs when used as monotherapy. Therefore, mechanisms of drug resistance are investigated, and new molecular targets are sought that could completely inhibit melanoma progression. Since receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK4) probably functions as an oncogene in melanoma and its structure is similar to the BRAF protein, we analyzed the impact of vemurafenib and dabrafenib on RIPK4 in melanomas. The in silico study confirmed the high similarity of BRAF kinase domains to the RIPK4 protein at both the sequence and structural levels and suggests that BRAFi could directly bind to RIPK4 even more strongly than to ATP. Furthermore, BRAFi inhibited ERK1/2 activity and lowered RIPK4 protein levels in BRAF-mutated melanoma cells (A375 and WM266.4), while in wild-type BRAF cells (BLM and LoVo), both inhibitors decreased the level of RIPK4 and enhanced ERK1/2 activity. The phosphorylation of phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1 (PEBP1)—a suppressor of the BRAF/MEK/ERK pathway—via RIPK4 observed in pancreatic cancer did not occur in melanoma. Neither downregulation nor upregulation of RIPK4 in BRAF- mutated cells affected PEBP1 levels or the BRAF/MEK/ERK pathway. The downregulation of RIPK4 inhibited cell proliferation and the FAK/AKT pathway, and increased BRAFi efficiency in WM266.4 cells. However, the silencing of RIPK4 did not induce apoptosis or necroptosis. Our study suggests that RIPK4 may be an off-target for BRAF inhibitors.

Aim: Resistance to trastuzumab (which is a standard therapy for breast cancer patients with HER2 overexpression) is associated with higher risk of progression or cancer death, and might be related to activation of signalling cascades (PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Ras/Raf/MAPK) and decreased level of their inhibitors.

Rarity and heterogeneity of liposarcomas (LPS) make their diagnosis difficult even for sarcoma-experts pathologists. The molecular mechanism underlying the development and progression of liposarcomas (LPS) remains only partially known. In order to identify and compare the genomic profiles, we analyzed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) profiles of 66 liposarcomas, including well-differentiated (WDLPS), dedifferentiated (DDLPS) and myxoid (MLPS) subtypes. Copy number aberrations (CNAs) were identified in 98% of WDLPS and DDLPS and in 95% of MLPS cases. The minimal common region of amplification at 12q14.1q21.1 was observed in 96% of WDLPS and DDLPS cases. Four regions of CNAs, including losses of chromosome 6, 11 and 13 and gains of chromosome 14 were classified as recurrent in DDLPS; at least one was identified in 74% of DDLPS tumors. The DDLPS-associated losses were much more common in tumors with increased genomic complexity. In MLPS, the most frequent CNAs were losses of chromosome 6 (40%) and gains of chromosome 1 (30%), with the minimal overlapping regions 6q14.1q22.31 and 1q25.1q32.2, respectively. Our findings show that the application of array-CGH allows to delineate clearly the genomic profiles of WDLPS, DDLPS and MLPS that reflect biological differences between these tumors. Although CNAs varied widely, the subtypes of tumors have characteristic genomic profiles that could facilitate the differential diagnosis of LPS subtypes, especially between WDLPS and DDLPS.

Successful immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy occurs in only a fraction of melanoma patients, and yet all patients are susceptible to potentially serious ICI-related side-effects. No current biomarkers robustly predict ICI treatment response in melanoma patients. In this study we sought to identify methylome and transcriptome markers which have the potential to predict immunotherapy response in melanoma patients ahead of treatment with anti-PD1 ICI monotherapy. Using Infinium MethylationEPIC microarrays, we analysed DNA methylation profiles of >850,000 CpG sites in pre-treatment melanoma tissues from patients administered anti-PD-1 monotherapy as first-line treatment. In addition, we analysed transcriptomes using RNA-seq. DNA methylation and gene expression data were then statistically compared to patient response to anti-PD1 therapy. We identified 2579 DNA hypomethylation and hypermethylation alterations correlating with melanoma response to anti-PD1 therapy. An integrative analysis of DNA methylomes and transcriptomes identified a subset of 35 loci, 13 of which were significantly differentially methylated in both initial discovery and external validation datasets. Functional enrichment analysis of hypomethylated sites (p-value <0.05) in non-responders was associated with "Formation of the cornified envelope", "Regulation of epithelial cell proliferation", and "Purine-containing compound metabolic process". We have identified novel integrated DNA methylation and gene expression markers, which correlate with anti-PD1 treatment response in melanoma patients. These findings suggest a relationship between tumour-associated genomic DNA methylation, gene expression patterns, and anti-PD1 ICI immunotherapy response in melanoma patients.

Melanoma comprises <5% of cutaneous malignancies, yet it causes a significant proportion of skin cancer-related deaths worldwide. While new therapies for melanoma have been developed, not all patients respond well. Thus, further research is required to better predict patient outcomes. Using long-range nanopore sequencing, RT-qPCR, and RNA sequencing analyses, we examined the transcription of BARD1 splice isoforms in melanoma cell lines and patient tissue samples. Seventy-six BARD1 mRNA variants were identified in total, with several previously characterised isoforms (γ, φ, δ, ε, and η) contributing to a large proportion of the expressed transcripts. In addition, we identified four novel splice events, namely, Δ(E3_E9), ▼(i8), IVS10+131▼46, and IVS10▼176, occurring in various combinations in multiple transcripts. We found that short-read RNA-Seq analyses were limited in their ability to predict isoforms containing multiple non-contiguous splicing events, as compared to long-range nanopore sequencing. These studies suggest that further investigations into the functional significance of the identified BARD1 splice variants in melanoma are warranted.

Receptor‐interacting protein kinase 4 (RIPK4) has been implicated in the progression of numerous tumours. In nonmelanoma skin cancer, RIPK4 plays a suppressor role, whereas in melanoma, it functions as an oncogene that modulates key signalling pathways involved in melanoma cell survival and expansion. Increased RIPK4 levels in metastatic melanoma biopsies prompted us to investigate the consequences of RIPK4 loss for the invasive and metastatic phenotype of melanoma cells. Using an integrated approach involving clinical samples, in vivo xenograft models, transcriptomic analysis and 3D functional assays, we show that RIPK4 deletion significantly reduces pulmonary metastasis formation. This reflects its role in late‐stage metastatic events, such as extravasation and colonization, particularly since this phenotype correlates with extensive transcriptional reprogramming of adhesion‐ and motility‐related genes in melanoma cells, as evidenced by next‐generation sequencing and functional validation in spheroid and collagen‐based models. Despite exhibiting features of a partial shift towards an amoeboid phenotype such as membrane blebbing and increased MLC2 phosphorylation, RIPK4 knockout cells display impaired motility and invasion. Re‐expression of RIPK4 restores mesenchymal morphology and migratory capacity. Together, our results establish RIPK4 as a critical regulator of melanoma invasion and metastasis. Nonetheless, they also demonstrate that the loss of RIPK4 function activates compensatory phenotypic shifts in melanoma cells that fail to fully rescue their invasive potential.