Zejun Yang

Mr. Zejun Yang

Capital Medical Univerisity, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 March 2021 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZYZejun Yang
Zejun Yang
BWBo-Ya Wang
Bo-Ya Wang
Tian-Tian WangTian-Tian Wang
Tian-Tian Wang
FWFei-Fei Wang
Fei-Fei Wang
YGYuexin Guo
Yuexin Guo
JXJingdong Xu
Jingdong Xu
Dendritic cells (DCs), including conventional DCs (cDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), serve as the sentinel cells of the immune system and are responsible for presenting antigen information. Moreover, the role of DCs derived from monocytes (moDCs) in the development of inflammation has been emphasized. Several studies have shown that the function of DCs can be influenced by gut microbes including gut bacteria and viruses. Abnormal changes/reactions in intestinal DCs are potentially associated with diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and intestinal tumors, allowing DCs to be a new target for the treatment of these diseases. In this review, we summarized the physiological functions of DCs in the intestinal micro-environment, their regulatory relationship with intestinal microorganisms and their regulatory mechanism in intestinal diseases.

3 February 2026 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CJChao Jiang
Chao Jiang
ZZZixu Zhao
Zixu Zhao
ZYZejun Yang
Zejun Yang
YWYiping Wang
Yiping Wang
YXYang Xu
Yang Xu
CMChangsheng Ma
Changsheng Ma
BACKGROUND: Observational studies have suggested that SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitors are associated with a lower risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with AF with concomitant diabetes, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease. However, no randomized trial to date has tested whether SGLT2 inhibitors reduce AF recurrence after ablation in patients without established indications. We therefore investigated the effect of dapagliflozin on prevention of early recurrence of AF after catheter ablation in patients without current indications for SGLT2 inhibitors. METHODS: The DARE-AF trial (Dapagliflozin on Recurrence After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation) was a prospective, open-label, parallel-assignment randomized controlled trial that enrolled 200 patients with persistent AF between July 2024 and March 2025, scheduled to undergo a first catheter ablation procedure and without established indications for dapagliflozin (diabetes, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease). Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to dapagliflozin (10 mg once daily for 3 months after the ablation) or control. The primary end point was AF burden at 3 months after ablation, assessed by 7-day single-lead ECG patches. Secondary outcomes included time to events, quality of life, and improvement of atrial remodeling. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients (mean age 58.5 years, 19.5% women, 29.0% with persistent AF ≥1 year) were randomized, and 198 patients (98 in the dapagliflozin group, 100 in the control group) were included in the primary analysis. Three months after ablation, the difference in AF burden was insignificant between the dapagliflozin group and the control group (7.5±23.6% versus 8.1±25.5%; P =0.48). Atrial arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 29 patients (29.6%) in the dapagliflozin group and 28 patients (28.0%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.66–1.86]; P =0.70). No significant between-group differences were observed in changes in quality of life or left atrial diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Three-month treatment with dapagliflozin did not reduce the early recurrence of arrhythmia after catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT06433479.

6 May 2025 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SLSitong Li
Sitong Li
JZJingrui Zhang
Jingrui Zhang
SZSong Zuo
Song Zuo
JWJue Wang
Jue Wang
YLYiwei Lai
Yiwei Lai
CMChangsheng Ma
Changsheng Ma
Background: Atrial arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is conventionally assessed as a binary end point. However, the prognostic value of recurrence patterns is less studied. Methods and Results: This study included patients undergoing catheter ablation from the multicenter China Atrial Fibrillation Registry study (2011–2022). Postablation AF patterns within 1 year were categorized as nonrecurrence, paroxysmal AF recurrence, or persistent AF (PersAF) recurrence. Cardiovascular outcomes included cardiovascular death, thromboembolism, and cardiovascular hospitalization. Cox proportional models with landmark analysis were used to assess the relationship between recurrence patterns and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Fine‐Gray models, considering death unrelated to the outcomes as the competing risk and evaluating 2‐year recurrence patterns. Among 13 811 patients (mean age, 60.5±10.8 years; 66.1% men), those with preablation PersAF, prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism, and increased left atrial diameter were more likely to develop PersAF postablation. Compared with nonrecurrence, PersAF recurrence was associated with higher risks of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03 [95% CI, 1.20–3.43]; P =0.009), thromboembolism (HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.09–2.06]; P =0.012), and cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.56–1.94]; P <0.001) during a median follow‐up of 3.02 years (interquartile range, 1.44–5.03 years), while paroxysmal AF recurrence was only significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.83–2.14], P <0.001). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. Conclusions: Postablation PersAF recurrence was associated with significantly higher risks of cardiovascular death and thromboembolism, compared with paroxysmal AF recurrence and nonrecurrence, indicating the prognostic importance of recurrence patterns. Registration: URL: www.chictr.org.cn/ ; unique identifier: ChiCTR‐OCH‐13003729.

18 June 2024 in Heart Rhythm
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZYZejun Yang
Zejun Yang
JWJue Wang
Jue Wang
CJChao Jiang
Chao Jiang
HGHang Guo
Hang Guo
MLMingxiao Li
Mingxiao Li
CMChangsheng Ma
Changsheng Ma

16 October 2026 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZZZixu Zhao
Zixu Zhao
MLMingxiao Li
Mingxiao Li
ZWZhixian Wang
Zhixian Wang
TJTiannan Jiang
Tiannan Jiang
CWChaohui Wang
Chaohui Wang
CMChangsheng Ma
Changsheng Ma

6 October 2026 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLan Ren
Lan Ren
XPXiaodong Peng
Xiaodong Peng
SLSitong Li
Sitong Li
JWJue Wang
Jue Wang
JZJingrui Zhang
Jingrui Zhang
CMChangsheng Ma
Changsheng Ma
Background: Despite the growing use of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, large‐scale studies assessing the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation (OAC) after ablation, particularly in patients with high stroke risk, remain limited. Methods: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients from the China‐AF (China Atrial Fibrillation) registry between August 2011 and June 2022. Stroke risk was stratified by CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VA score as low (0–1), intermediate (2), or high (≥3). The study end points were thromboembolism (ischemic stroke or systemic embolism), and bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis major bleeding and clinically relevant non‐major bleeding). A 6‐month landmark analysis was applied to evaluate the association of OAC with end points using incidence rates and Cox models. Results: Among 13 669 patients (median follow‐up, 4.0 years), 2637 continued and 11 032 discontinued OAC at the 6‐month landmark. OAC was not associated with reduced thromboembolism risk across low‐ (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.70–1.77]; P =0.649), intermediate‐ (aHR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.36–1.16]; P =0.141) or high‐stroke risk patients (aHR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.74–1.48]; P =0.801). In contrast, continued OAC was associated with higher bleeding risk, including clinically relevant non‐major bleeding across stroke risk strata, and International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis major bleeding among high‐risk patients (aHR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.19–4.50]; P =0.013). These results were consistent across subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: In this large, real‐world cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation, continued OAC was not associated with lower thromboembolic risk, but with higher major bleeding risk among patients with CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VA scores ≥3. These findings support individualized post‐ablation anticoagulation strategies and warrant future investigation. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT06987825.