Aims Pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) remains unclear. Left atrial (LA) function has been related to HF symptoms. Our purpose is to analyse LA function in outpatients with new onset symptoms of HF. Methods and results An observational study was performed including 138 consecutive outpatients with suspected HF referred to a one-stop clinic. Final diagnosis [HF with reduced EF (HFREF), HFPEF, or non-HF] was established according to current recommendations. Echocardiography was performed in all patients. LA function was analysed using strain derived from speckle tracking in sinus rhythm patients ( n = 83). Results were analysed with ANOVA and Bonferroni statistical tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to investigate the predictive ability of LA parameters for the final diagnosis of HF. Patients were 75 ± 9 years and 63% women. Final diagnosis was 23.2% HFREF, 45.7% HFPEF, and 31.2% non-HF. Left ventricular strain rate showed no differences between non-HF and HFPEF groups, but both groups showed differences with the HFREF group. LA strain rate (A- and S-waves) was significantly reduced in both HF groups (without differences among them) when compared with the non-HF group. LA strain rate and indexed volume showed significant accuracy for HF diagnosis in ROC curves. Conclusions In outpatients with new-onset symptoms of HF, LA dysfunction was observed. It might be the initial mechanism in the development of symptoms in HFPEF patients. These findings support the relationship of LA dysfunction with HFPEF, suggesting that the analysis of LA function may be useful in sinus rhythm patients with new-onset dyspnoea.

To determine the prevalence of mitral regurgitation (MR) in a large cohort of consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography and to examine the distribution of primary and secondary MR. All patients undergoing an echocardiographic study in 19 European centres within a 3-month period were prospectively included. MR assessment was performed as recommended by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). MR was classified according to mechanism as primary or secondary and aetiologies were reported. A total of 63 463 consecutive echocardiographic studies were reviewed. Any degree of MR was described in 15 501 patients. Concomitant valve disease of at least moderate grade was present in 28.5% of patients, being tricuspid regurgitation the most prevalent. In the subgroup of moderate and severe MR (n = 3309), 55% of patients had primary MR and 30% secondary MR. Both mechanisms were described in 14% of the studies. According to Carpentier's classification, 26.7% of MR were classified as I, 19.9% of MR as II, 22.4% of MR as IIIa, and 31.1% of MR as IIIb. To date, this is the largest echocardiography-based study to analyse the prevalence and aetiology distribution of MR in Europe. The burden of secondary MR was higher than previously described, representing 30% of patients with significant MR. In our environment, degenerative disease is the most common aetiology of primary MR (60%), whereas ischaemic is the most common aetiology of secondary MR (51%). Up to 70% of patients with severe primary MR may have a Class I indication for surgery. However, the optimal therapeutic approach for secondary MR remains uncertain.