Xiangwen Kong

Dr. Xiangwen Kong

Asia Pacific E & P, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2018 in Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPenghui Su
Penghui Su
ZXZhaohui Xia
Zhaohui Xia
LQLiangchao Qu
Liangchao Qu
Wei YuWei Yu
Wei Yu
PWPing Wang
Ping Wang
XKXiangwen Kong
Xiangwen Kong

3 September 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZGZekun Guo
Zekun Guo
HWHongjun Wang
Hongjun Wang
XKXiangwen Kong
Xiangwen Kong
LSLi Shen
Li Shen
YJYuepeng Jia
Yuepeng Jia
The production of a single gas well is influenced by many geological and completion factors. The aim of this paper is to build a production prediction model based on machine learning technique and identify the most important factor for production. Firstly, around 159 horizontal wells were collected, targeting the Duvernay Formation with detailed geological and completion records. Secondly, the key factors were selected using grey relation analysis and Pearson correlation. Then, three statistical models were built through multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector regression (SVR), gaussian process regression (GPR). The model inputs include fluid volume, proppant amount, cluster counts, stage counts, total horizontal lateral length, gas saturation, total organic carbon content, condensate-gas ratio. The model performance was assessed by root mean squared errors (RMSE) and R-squared value. Finally, sensitivity analysis was applied based on best performance model. The analysis shows following conclusions: (1) GPR model shows the best performance with the highest R-squared value and the lowest RMSE. In the testing set, the model shows a R-squared of 0.8 with a RMSE of 280.54 × 104 m3 in the prediction of cumulative gas production within 1st 6 producing months and gives a R-squared of 0.83 with a RMSE of 1884.3 t in the prediction of cumulative oil production within 1st 6 producing months (2) Sensitivity analysis based on GPR model indicates that condensate-gas ratio, fluid volume, and total organic carbon content are the most important features to cumulative oil production within 1st 6 producing months. Fluid volume, Stages, and total organic carbon content are the most significant factors to cumulative gas production within 1st 6 producing months. The analysis progress and results developed in this study will assist companies to build prediction models and figure out which factors control well performance.

2 May 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HWHongjun Wang
Hongjun Wang
ZGZekun Guo
Zekun Guo
XKXiangwen Kong
Xiangwen Kong
XZXinshun Zhang
Xinshun Zhang
PWPing Wang
Ping Wang
YSYunpeng Shan
Yunpeng Shan
With the continuous improvement of shale oil and gas recovery technologies and achievements, a large amount of geological information and data have been accumulated for the description of shale reservoirs, and it has become possible to use machine learning methods for “sweet spots” prediction in shale oil and gas areas. Taking the Duvernay shale oil and gas field in Canada as an example, this paper attempts to build recoverable shale oil and gas reserve prediction models using machine learning methods and geological and development big data, to predict the distribution of recoverable shale oil and gas reserves and provide a basis for well location deployment and engineering modifications. The research results of the machine learning model in this study are as follows: ① Three machine learning methods were applied to build a prediction model and random forest showed the best performance. The R2 values of the built recoverable shale oil and gas reserves prediction models are 0.7894 and 0.8210, respectively, with an accuracy that meets the requirements of production applications; ② The geological main controlling factors for recoverable shale oil and gas reserves in this area are organic matter maturity and total organic carbon (TOC), followed by porosity and effective thickness; the main controlling factor for engineering modifications is the total proppant volume, followed by total stages and horizontal lateral length; ③ The abundance of recoverable shale oil and gas reserves in the central part of the study area is predicted to be relatively high, which makes it a favorable area for future well location deployment.

8 April 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XKXiangwen Kong
Xiangwen Kong
HWHongjun Wang
Hongjun Wang
Wei YuWei Yu
Wei Yu
PWPing Wang
Ping Wang
JMJijun Miao
Jijun Miao
MFMauricio Fiallos-Torres
Mauricio Fiallos-Torres
Duvernay shale is a world class shale deposit with a total resource of 440 billion barrels oil equivalent in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). The volatile oil recovery factors achieved from primary production are much lower than those from the gas-condensate window, typically 5–10% of original oil in place (OOIP). The previous study has indicated that huff-n-puff gas injection is one of the most promising enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in shale oil reservoirs. In this paper, we built a comprehensive numerical compositional model in combination with the embedded discrete fracture model (EDFM) method to evaluate geological and engineering controls on gas huff-n-puff in Duvernay shale volatile oil reservoirs. Multiple scenarios of compositional simulations of huff-n-puff gas injection for the proposed twelve parameters have been conducted and effects of reservoir, completion and depletion development parameters on huff-n-puff are evaluated. We concluded that fracture conductivity, natural fracture density, period of primary depletion, and natural fracture permeability are the most sensitive parameters for incremental oil recovery from gas huff-n-puff. Low fracture conductivity and a short period of primary depletion could significantly increase the gas usage ratio and result in poor economical efficiency of the gas huff-n-puff process. Sensitivity analysis indicates that due to the increase of the matrix-surface area during gas huff-n-puff process, natural fractures associated with hydraulic fractures are the key controlling factors for gas huff-n-puff in Duvernay shale oil reservoirs. The range for the oil recovery increase over the primary recovery for one gas huff-n-puff cycle (nearly 2300 days of production) in Duvernay shale volatile oil reservoir is between 0.23 and 0.87%. Finally, we proposed screening criteria for gas huff-n-puff potential areas in volatile oil reservoirs from Duvernay shale. This study is highly meaningful and can give valuable reference to practical works conducting the huff-n-puff gas injection in both Duvernay and other shale oil reservoirs.

26 November 2025 in Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HTHua Tian
Hua Tian
XWXiaohan Wang
Xiaohan Wang
XWXiaomei Wang
Xiaomei Wang
MMMianmo Meng
Mianmo Meng
XKXiangwen Kong
Xiangwen Kong
SZShuichang Zhang
Shuichang Zhang

27 July 2022 in Lithosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XKXiangwen Kong
Xiangwen Kong
HWHongjun Wang
Hongjun Wang
WYWei Yu
Wei Yu
PWPing Wang
Ping Wang
LLLi Liu
Li Liu
WZWenjing Zhang
Wenjing Zhang
Duvernay shale spans over 6 million acres with a total resource of 440 billion barrels’ oil equivalent in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). The oil recovery factors typically decrease with the decreasing of gas-oil ratio (GOR) in oil window of Duvernay shale. The volatile oil recovery factors are typically 5–10%. Enhanced oil recovery technologies should be applied to improve the economics of the reservoirs. In this paper, the volatile oil from the Duvernay shale was taken as an example for phase behavior study. We analyzed the nanopore confinement on phase behavior and physical properties of Duvernay shale oil. The shift of critical properties was quantified within nanopores. With the confinement of nanopores, the viscosity, density, and bubble point pressure of the oil decrease with the shrinking of the pore size. Minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) was calculated for different injected gases. The MMP from high to low is N2>CH4>lean gas>rich gas>CO2⁠. In the case of injecting the same gas component, the MMP decreases as the pore size decreases. The wellhead rich gas is suggested to be the main gas source for gas injection in Duvernay shale. The formation pressure should be rapidly increased to the MMP and maintained close to it, which would help to improve the effect of gas injection and enhance shale oil recovery. This paper can provide critical insights for the research of shale oil gas injection for enhanced oil recovery.