Mafalda Miranda

Ms. Mafalda Miranda

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 July 2021 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMafalda Miranda
Mafalda Miranda
MPMarta Pingarilho
Marta Pingarilho
VPVictor Pimentel
Victor Pimentel
MMMaria Rosario Martins
Maria Rosario Martins
AVAnne-Mieke Vandamme
Anne-Mieke Vandamme
AAAna Abecasis
Ana Abecasis
To control the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) set the 90-90-90 target to be reached by 2020. One major threat to those goals is late presentation, which is defined as an individual presenting a TCD4+ count lower than 350 cells/mm3 or an AIDS-defining event. The present study aims to identify determinants of late presentation in Europe based on the EuResist database with HIV-1 infected patients followed-up between 1981 and 2019. Our study includes clinical and socio-demographic information from 89851 HIV-1 infected patients. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio and SPSS and a Bayesian network was constructed with the WEKA software to analyze the association between all variables. Among 89,851 HIV-1 infected patients included in the analysis, the median age was 33 (IQR: 27.0–41.0) years and 74.4% were males. Of those, 28,889 patients (50.4%) were late presenters. Older patients (>56), heterosexuals, patients originated from Africa and patients presenting with log VL >4.1 had a higher probability of being late presenters (p < 0.001). Bayesian networks indicated VL, mode of transmission, age and recentness of infection as variables that were directly associated with LP. This study highlights the major determinants associated with late presentation in Europe. This study helps to direct prevention measures for this population.

13 April 2022 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMafalda Miranda
Mafalda Miranda
MPMarta Pingarilho
Marta Pingarilho
VPVictor Pimentel
Victor Pimentel
MMMaria Do Rosário O. Martins
Maria Do Rosário O. Martins
RKRolf Kaiser
Rolf Kaiser
AAAna B. Abecasis
Ana B. Abecasis
Background: The increased use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has decreased mortality and morbidity of HIV-1 infected people but increasing levels of HIV drug resistance threatens the success of ART regimens. Conversely, late presentation can impact treatment outcomes, health costs, and potential transmission of HIV.Objective: To describe the patterns of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and acquired drug resistance (ADR) in HIV-1 infected patients followed in Europe, to compare its patterns in late presenters (LP) vs non-late presenters (NLP), and to analyze the most prevalent drug resistance mutations among HIV-1 subtypes.Methods: Our study included clinical, socio-demographic, and genotypic information from 26,973 HIV-1 infected patients from the EuResist Integrated Database (EIDB) between 1981 and 2019.Results: Among the 26,973 HIV-1 infected patients in the analysis, 11,581 (42.9%) were ART-naïve patients and 15,392 (57.1%) were ART-experienced. The median age was 37 (IQR: 27.0–45.0) years old and 72.6% were males. The main transmission route was through heterosexual contact (34.9%) and 81.7% of patients originated from Western Europe. 71.9% of patients were infected by subtype B and 54.8% of patients were classified as LP. The overall prevalence of TDR was 12.8% and presented an overall decreasing trend (p for trend < 0.001), the ADR prevalence was 68.5% also with a decreasing trend (p for trend < 0.001). For LP and NLP, the TDR prevalence was 12.3 and 12.6%, respectively, while for ADR, 69.9 and 68.2%, respectively. The most prevalent TDR drug resistance mutations, in both LP and NLP, were K103N/S, T215rev, T215FY, M184I/V, M41I/L, M46I/L, and L90M.Conclusion: Our study showed that the overall TDR (12.8%) and ADR (68.5%) presented decreasing trends during the study time period. For LP, the overall TDR was slightly lower than for NLP (12.3 vs 12.6%, respectively); while this pattern was opposite for ADR (LP slightly higher than NLP). We suggest that these differences, in the case of TDR, can be related to the dynamics of fixation of drug resistance mutations; and in the case of ADR with the more frequent therapeutic failure in LPs.

2 June 2022 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMafalda Miranda
Mafalda Miranda
MPMarta Pingarilho
Marta Pingarilho
VPVictor Pimentel
Victor Pimentel
ATAndrea Torneri
Andrea Torneri
SSSofia G. Seabra
Sofia G. Seabra
AAAna B. Abecasis
Ana B. Abecasis
Emerging infectious diseases are one of the main threats to public health, with the potential to cause a pandemic when the infectious agent manages to spread globally. The first major pandemic to appear in the 20th century was the influenza pandemic of 1918, caused by the influenza A H1N1 strain that is characterized by a high fatality rate. Another major pandemic was caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), that started early in the 20th century and remained undetected until 1981. The ongoing HIV pandemic demonstrated a high mortality and morbidity rate, with discrepant impacts in different regions around the globe. The most recent major pandemic event, is the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which has caused over 5.7 million deaths since its emergence, 2 years ago. The aim of this work is to highlight the main determinants of the emergence, epidemic response and available countermeasures of these three pandemics, as we argue that such knowledge is paramount to prepare for the next pandemic. We analyse these pandemics’ historical and epidemiological contexts and the determinants of their emergence. Furthermore, we compare pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions that have been used to slow down these three pandemics and zoom in on the technological advances that were made in the progress. Finally, we discuss the evolution of epidemiological modelling, that has become an essential tool to support public health policy making and discuss it in the context of these three pandemics. While these pandemics are caused by distinct viruses, that ignited in different time periods and in different regions of the globe, our work shows that many of the determinants of their emergence and countermeasures used to halt transmission were common. Therefore, it is important to further improve and optimize such approaches and adapt it to future threatening emerging infectious diseases.

28 February 2020 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VPVictor Pimentel
Victor Pimentel
MPMarta Pingarilho
Marta Pingarilho
DADaniela Amaral Alves
Daniela Amaral Alves
IDIsabel Diogo
Isabel Diogo
SFSandra Maria mendes Fernandes
Sandra Maria mendes Fernandes
AAAna Abecasis
Ana Abecasis
Migration is associated with HIV-1 vulnerability. Objectives: To identify long-term trends in HIV-1 molecular epidemiology and antiretroviral drug resistance (ARV) among migrants followed up in Portugal Methods: 5177 patients were included between 2001 and 2017. Rega, Scuel, Comet, and jPHMM algorithms were used for subtyping. Transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and Acquired drug resistance (ADR) were defined as the presence of surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) and as mutations of the IAS-USA 2015 algorithm, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed. Results: HIV-1 subtypes infecting migrants were consistent with the ones prevailing in their countries of origin. Over time, overall TDR significantly increased and specifically for Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTIs) and Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTIs). TDR was higher in patients from Mozambique. Country of origin Mozambique and subtype B were independently associated with TDR. Overall, ADR significantly decreased over time and specifically for NRTIs and Protease Inhibitors (PIs). Age, subtype B, and viral load were independently associated with ADR. Conclusions: HIV-1 molecular epidemiology in migrants suggests high levels of connectivity with their country of origin. The increasing levels of TDR in migrants could indicate an increase also in their countries of origin, where more efficient surveillance should occur.

30 October 2020 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMarta Pingarilho
Marta Pingarilho
VPVictor Pimentel
Victor Pimentel
IDIsabel Diogo
Isabel Diogo
SFSandra Maria mendes Fernandes
Sandra Maria mendes Fernandes
MMMafalda Miranda
Mafalda Miranda
OGon behalf of the Portuguese HIV-1 Resistance Study Group
on behalf of the Portuguese HIV-1 Resistance Study Group
Introduction: Treatment for All recommendations have allowed access to antiretroviral (ARV) treatment for an increasing number of patients. This minimizes the transmission of infection but can potentiate the risk of transmitted (TDR) and acquired drug resistance (ADR). Objective: To study the trends of TDR and ADR in patients followed up in Portuguese hospitals between 2001 and 2017. Methods: In total, 11,911 patients of the Portuguese REGA database were included. TDR was defined as the presence of one or more surveillance drug resistance mutation according to the WHO surveillance list. Genotypic resistance to ARV was evaluated with Stanford HIVdb v7.0. Patterns of TDR, ADR and the prevalence of mutations over time were analyzed using logistic regression. Results and Discussion: The prevalence of TDR increased from 7.9% in 2003 to 13.1% in 2017 (p < 0.001). This was due to a significant increase in both resistance to nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), from 5.6% to 6.7% (p = 0.002) and 2.9% to 8.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. TDR was associated with infection with subtype B, and with lower viral load levels (p < 0.05). The prevalence of ADR declined from 86.6% in 2001 to 51.0% in 2017 (p < 0.001), caused by decreasing drug resistance to all antiretroviral (ARV) classes (p < 0.001). Conclusions: While ADR has been decreasing since 2001, TDR has been increasing, reaching a value of 13.1% by the end of 2017. It is urgently necessary to develop public health programs to monitor the levels and patterns of TDR in newly diagnosed patients.

5 November 2021 in AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAna Cláudia Miranda
Ana Cláudia Miranda
MMMafalda Miranda
Mafalda Miranda
MPMarta Pingarilho
Marta Pingarilho
VPVictor Pimentel
Victor Pimentel
JTJoão Torres
João Torres
KMKamal Mansinho
Kamal Mansinho
Undiagnosed HIV-1 patients still account for 25% of worldwide HIV patients. Studying late presenters (LPs) for HIV care may help to identify characteristics of such patients. The present study aims to identify factors associated with late presentation and late presentation with advanced disease based on a population of patients followed in a Portuguese hospital between 1984 and 2017. Sociodemographic and clinical data from infected patients with HIV-1 aged 18 years and older, followed in Egas Moniz Hospital, in Portugal were collected. Of the 907 patients included in this study, 68.7% were males and the median age was 37 years (interquartile range 30–47). Four hundred fifty-nine patients (50.6%) were LP and, of these, 284 patients (61.9%) were LPAD. The LP population mostly originated from Portugal and sub-Saharan Africa (64.4% and 28.8%; p = .004) and the HIV exposure category, mainly heterosexuals and men have sex with men (57.0% and 24.9%; p < .001). The stage of disease and viral load at diagnosis were significantly associated with both LP and LPAD ( p < .001). Factors associated with LP in the logistic regression included age at diagnosis lower than 30 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.34; 0.17–0.68; p = .002) and origin from sub-Saharan Africa (aOR 2.24; 1.44–3.50; p < .001). Late presentation is a major obstacle to halt the HIV epidemic. In this population, the majority of newly diagnosed HIV-infected individuals were LPs. Our results characterize vulnerable populations that should be frequently tested for HIV.