James A. Bonner

Dr. James A. Bonner

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2010 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJames A. Bonner
James A. Bonner
PHPaul M Harari
Paul M Harari
JGJordi Giralt
Jordi Giralt
RCRoger B Cohen
Roger B Cohen
CJChristopher U Jones
Christopher U Jones
KAK Kian Ang
K Kian Ang

20 April 2016 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDavid I. Rosenthal
David I. Rosenthal
PHPaul M. Harari
Paul M. Harari
JGJordi Giralt
Jordi Giralt
DBDiana Bell
Diana Bell
DRDavid Raben
David Raben
JBJames A. Bonner
James A. Bonner
Purpose: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the IMCL-9815 study to examine the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and p16 protein expression status with outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) receiving radiotherapy (RT) plus cetuximab or RT alone. Patients and Methods: In the IMCL-9815 study, patients were randomly allocated to receive RT plus weekly cetuximab or RT alone. A subpopulation of patients with p16-evaluable OPC was retrospectively evaluated on the basis of locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Evaluable samples from patients with p16-positive OPC were also tested for HPV DNA. Results: Tumor p16 status was evaluable in 182 patients with OPC enrolled in the IMCL-9815 study; 41% were p16 positive. When treated with RT alone or RT plus cetuximab, p16-positive patients had a longer OS than p16-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.74 and hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.36, respectively). The addition of cetuximab to RT increased LRC, OS, and PFS in both patients with p16-positive OPC and those with p16-negative disease. Interaction tests for LRC, OS, and PFS did not demonstrate any significant interaction between p16 status and treatment effect (P = .087, .085, and .253, respectively). Similar trends were observed when patients with p16-positive/HPV-positive OPC (n = 49) and those with p16-positive/HPV-negative OPC (n = 14) were compared. Conclusion: p16 status was strongly prognostic for patients with OPC. The data suggest that the addition of cetuximab to RT improved clinical outcomes regardless of p16 or HPV status versus RT alone.

30 October 2024 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSHongxing Shen
Hongxing Shen
OOOluwagbemiga A. Ojo
Oluwagbemiga A. Ojo
HDHaitao Ding
Haitao Ding
LMLogan J. Mullen
Logan J. Mullen
CXChuan Xing
Chuan Xing
Lewis Z. ShiLewis Z. Shi
Lewis Z. Shi
Hypoxia is a common feature in various pathophysiological contexts, including tumor microenvironment, and IFN-γ is instrumental for anti-tumor immunity. HIF1α has long been known as a primary regulator of cellular adaptive responses to hypoxia, but its role in IFN-γ induction in hypoxic T cells is unknown. Here, we show that the HIF1α-glycolysis axis controls IFN-γ induction in both human and mouse T cells, activated under hypoxia. Specific deletion of HIF1α in T cells (Hif1α–/–) and glycolytic inhibition suppresses IFN-γ induction. Conversely, HIF1α stabilization by hypoxia and VHL deletion in T cells (Vhl–/–) increases IFN-γ production. Hypoxic Hif1α–/– T cells are less able to kill tumor cells in vitro, and tumor-bearing Hif1α–/– mice are not responsive to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy in vivo. Mechanistically, loss of HIF1α greatly diminishes glycolytic activity in hypoxic T cells, resulting in depleted intracellular acetyl-CoA and attenuated activation-induced cell death (AICD). Restoration of intracellular acetyl-CoA by acetate supplementation re-engages AICD, rescuing IFN-γ production in hypoxic Hif1α–/– T cells and re-sensitizing Hif1α–/– tumor-bearing mice to ICB. In summary, we identify HIF1α-regulated glycolysis as a key metabolic control of IFN-γ production in hypoxic T cells and ICB response.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSindhu Nair
Sindhu Nair
JBJames A. Bonner
James A. Bonner
MBMarkus Bredel
Markus Bredel
EGFR is a prototypical receptor tyrosine kinase that is overexpressed in multiple cancers including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The standard of care for HNSCC remains largely unchanged despite decades of research. While EGFR blockade is an attractive target in HNSCC patients and anti-EGFR strategies including monoclonal antibodies and kinase inhibitors have shown some clinical benefit, efficacy is often due to the eventual development of resistance. In this review, we discuss how the acquisition of mutations in various domains of the EGFR gene not only alter drug binding dynamics giving rise to resistance, but also how mutations can impact radiation response and overall survival in HNSCC patients. A better understanding of the EGFR mutational landscape and its dynamic effects on treatment resistance hold the potential to better stratify patients for targeted therapies in order to maximize therapeutic benefits.

1 January 2011 in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CMCaroline N. Mills
Caroline N. Mills
SNSomaira Nowsheen
Somaira Nowsheen
JBJames A. Bonner
James A. Bonner
EYEddy Yang
Eddy Yang
The constitutively active protein glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), a serine/threonine kinase, acts paradoxically as a tumor suppressor in some cancers while potentiates growth in others. Deciphering what governs its actions is vital for understanding many pathological conditions, including brain cancer. What are seemingly disparate roles of GSK3 stems from the complex regulation of many cellular functions by GSK3. This review focuses on the regulation of GSK3, its role in survival, apoptosis and DNA damage, and finally its potential therapeutic impact in brain cancer. A thorough understanding of this versatile protein is critical for improving the outcome of various diseases, especially cancer.

1 September 2016 in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJames A. Bonner
James A. Bonner
JGJordi Giralt
Jordi Giralt
PHPaul Harari
Paul Harari
SSSharon Spencer
Sharon Spencer
JSJeltje Schulten
Jeltje Schulten
JBJosé Baselga
José Baselga
Historically, locoregionally advanced squamous cell cancers of the larynx or hypopharynx have been treated with surgical resection, usually involving laryngectomy with or without postoperative radiotherapy.1 Although laryngectomy is an effective treatment, investigators have sought therapeutic strategies that result in voice preservation. Various modifications of surgical techniques have been explored.2-5 Alternatively, in the early 1980s, investigators evaluated curative primary radiotherapy with salvage surgery as an option for these patients.6,7 Retrospective studies8,9 that compared primary radiotherapy with salvage surgery to initial surgery with postoperative radiotherapy found similar rates of survival in patients with advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancers.