Jörn Lohmeyer

Prof. Jörn Lohmeyer

Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Hamburg, Dept. of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 November 2008 in Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJörn Lohmeyer
Jörn Lohmeyer
FSFrank Siemers
Frank Siemers
HMHans-Günther Machens
Hans-Günther Machens
PMPeter Mailänder
Peter Mailänder
Tubulization as an alternative to autologous nerve grafting successfully bridges relatively short nerve gaps. Digital nerve lesions are ideal for clinical outcome studies, but only a few data have been published so far. We are presenting our clinical experiences based on a review of the outcome and techniques in the current literature. Fifteen digital nerve lesions in 14 patients have been overcome by interpositional grafting of a hollow collagen I conduit. A follow-up of 12 months could be guaranteed in 12 cases. The mean nerve gap was 12.5 ± 3.7 mm. Four out of 12 patients, assessed 12 months postoperatively, showed excellent sensibility (S4). Five patients achieved good sensibility, one poor, and two no sensibility. Our results confirm tubulization as one possible technique in nerve reconstruction. However, the indication has to be set carefully, and the operation still requires solid microsurgical skills, especially for proper handling and debridement of the severed nerve endings.

1 January 2012 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZZZiyang Zhang
Ziyang Zhang
JEJosé Tomás Egana
José Tomás Egana
ARAnn K. Reckhenrich
Ann K. Reckhenrich
TSThilo Ludwig Schenck
Thilo Ludwig Schenck
JLJörn Lohmeyer
Jörn Lohmeyer
ASArndt F. Schilling
Arndt F. Schilling

1 February 2007 in Der Chirurg
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJörn Lohmeyer
Jörn Lohmeyer
SZS. Zimmermann
S. Zimmermann
BSB. Sommer
B. Sommer
HMH.-G. Machens
H.-G. Machens
TLT. Lange
T. Lange
PMP. Mailänder
P. Mailänder

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Paul HeidekruegerPaul Heidekrueger
Paul Heidekrueger
Nicholas MoellhoffNicholas Moellhoff
Nicholas Moellhoff
Raymund Engelbert HorchRaymund Engelbert Horch
Raymund Engelbert Horch
JLJörn Lohmeyer
Jörn Lohmeyer
MMMario Marx
Mario Marx
Uwe von FritschenUwe von Fritschen
Uwe von Fritschen
While autologous breast reconstruction has gained momentum over recent years, there is limited data on the structure and quality of care of microsurgical breast reconstruction in Germany. Using the breast reconstruction database established by the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC), the presented study investigated the overall outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions in Germany. Data of 3926 patients and 4577 DIEP flaps performed by 22 centers were included in this study. Demographics, patient characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative outcomes were accounted for. Centers performing < Ø 40 (low-volume (LV)) vs. ≥ Ø 40 (high-volume (HV)) annual DIEP flaps were analyzed separately. Overall, total and partial flap loss rates were as low as 2.0% and 1.1% respectively, and emergent vascular revision surgery was performed in 4.3% of cases. Revision surgery due to wound complications was conducted in 8.3% of all cases. Mean operative time and length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the HV group (LV: 385.82 min vs. HV: 287.14 min; LV: 9.04 (18.87) days vs. HV: 8.21 (5.04) days; both p < 0.05). The outcome and complication rates deduced from the national registry underline the high standard of microsurgical breast reconstruction on a national level in Germany.

1 October 2009 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJosé Tomás Egana
José Tomás Egana
SDSandra Danner
Sandra Danner
MKMathias Kremer
Mathias Kremer
DRDaniel H. Rapoport
Daniel H. Rapoport
JLJörn Lohmeyer
Jörn Lohmeyer
HMHans-Günther Machens
Hans-Günther Machens

1 April 2009 in Plastic Surgical Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJörn Lohmeyer
Jörn Lohmeyer
BSBianca Sommer
Bianca Sommer
FSFrank Siemers
Frank Siemers
PMPeter Mailänder
Peter Mailänder
Nerve injuries are common in trauma surgery and appear more frequently if the upper extremity is affected. The aim of this study is to estimate possible predictors of the outcome after nerve injury of the upper extremity and to demonstrate feasible tools to follow up postoperative nerve regeneration for the daily clinical practice. During January 2000 until December 2004, a total of 372 nerve lesions of the upper extremity have been treated in our clinic. Patient's age, site of nerve lesion, concomitant injuries, and the timing of surgical repair could be outlined to be significant predictors for clinical outcome. Digital nerve lesions showed the best regenerative capacity. Most predictors of clinical outcome such as patient's age, concomitant injuries, and site of lesion cannot be influenced. But knowing the predictors helps specify the prognosis of nerve regeneration. For the daily clinical practice, static two-point discrimination, location of Tinel's sign, and grip strength measurement seem to be fast and reproducible tools to follow up nerve regeneration at the upper extremity.