We conducted intradiscal pressure measurements with one volunteer performing various activities normally found in daily life, sports, and spinal therapy. The goal of this study was to measure intradiscal pressure to complement earlier data from Nachemson with dynamic and long-term measurements over a broad range of activities. Loading of the spine still is not well understood. The most important in vivo data are from pioneering intradiscal pressure measurements recorded by Nachemson during the 1960s. Since that time, there have been few data to corroborate or dispute those findings. Under sterile surgical conditions, a pressure transducer with a diameter of 1.5 mm was implanted in the nucleus pulposus of a nondegenerated L4–L5 disc of a male volunteer 45-years-old and weighing 70 kg. Pressure was recorded with a telemetry system during a period of approximately 24 hours for various lying positions; sitting positions in a chair, in an armchair, and on a pezziball (ergonomic sitting ball); during sneezing, laughing, walking, jogging, stair climbing, load lifting; during hydration over 7 hours of sleeping, and others. The following values and more were measured: lying prone, 0.1 MPa; lying laterally, 0.12 MPa; relaxed standing, 0.5 MPa; standing flexed forward, 1.1 MPa; sitting unsupported, 0.46 MPa; sitting with maximum flexion, 0.83 MPa; nonchalant sitting, 0.3 MPa; and lifting a 20-kg weight with round flexed back, 2.3 MPa; with flexed knees, 1.7 MPa; and close to the body, 1.1 MPa. During the night, pressure increased from 0.1 to 0.24 MPa. Good correlation was found with Nachemson’s data during many exercises, with the exception of the comparison of standing and sitting or of the various lying positions. Notwithstanding the limitations related to the single-subject design of this study, these differences may be explained by the different transducers used. It can be cautiously concluded that the intradiscal pressure during sitting may in fact be less than that in erect standing, that muscle activity increases pressure, that constantly changing position is important to promote flow of fluid (nutrition) to the disc, and that many of the physiotherapy methods studied are valid, but a number of them should be re-evaluated.

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is an often investigated pathophysiological condition because of its implication in causing low back pain. As human material for such studies is difficult to obtain because of ethical and government regulatory restriction, animal tissue, organs and in vivo models have often been used for this purpose. However, there are many differences in cell population, tissue composition, disc and spine anatomy, development, physiology and mechanical properties, between animal species and human. Both naturally occurring and induced degenerative changes may differ significantly from those seen in humans. This paper reviews the many animal models developed for the study of IVD degeneration aetiopathogenesis and treatments thereof. In particular, the limitations and relevance of these models to the human condition are examined, and some general consensus guidelines are presented. Although animal models are invaluable to increase our understanding of disc biology, because of the differences between species, care must be taken when used to study human disc degeneration and much more effort is needed to facilitate research on human disc material.

This study investigated the influence of five different muscle groups on the monosegmental motion (L4-L5) during pure flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments. The results showed and compared the effect of different muscle groups acting in different directions on the stability of a single motion segment to find loading conditions for in vitro experiments that simulate more physiologically reasonable loads. In spine biomechanics research, most in vitro experiments have been carried out without applying muscle forces, even though these forces stabilize the spinal column in vivo. Seven human lumbosacral spines were tested in a spine tester that allows simulation of up to five symmetrical muscle forces. Changing pure flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments up to +/- 3.75 Nm were applied without muscle forces, with different muscle groups and combinations. The three-dimensional monosegmental motion was determined using an instrumented spatial linkage system. Simulated muscle forces were found to strongly influence load-deformation characteristics. Muscle action generally decreased the range of motion and the neutral zone of the motion segments. This was most evident for flexion and extension. After five pairs of symmetrical, constant muscle forces were applied (80 N per pair), the range of motion decreased about 93% in flexion and 85% in extension. The total neutral zone for flexion and extension was decreased by 83% muscle action. The multifidus muscle group had the strongest influence. This experiment showed the importance of including at least some of the most important muscle groups in in vitro experiments on lumbar spine specimens.