Callie Babbitt

Dr. Callie Babbitt


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2017 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KRKirti Richa
Kirti Richa
CBCallie Babbitt
Callie Babbitt
GGGabrielle Gaustad
Gabrielle Gaustad

19 February 2020 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XFXinkai Fu
Xinkai Fu
DBDanielle N. Beatty
Danielle N. Beatty
GGGabrielle Gaustad
Gabrielle Gaustad
GCGerbrand Ceder
Gerbrand Ceder
RRRichard Roth
Richard Roth
EOElsa A. Olivetti
Elsa A. Olivetti

11 August 2015 in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KRKirti Richa
Kirti Richa
CBCallie Babbitt
Callie Babbitt
NNNenad G. Nenadic
Nenad G. Nenadic
GGGabrielle Gaustad
Gabrielle Gaustad

1 April 2021 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SAShahana Althaf
Shahana Althaf
CBCallie Babbitt
Callie Babbitt

1 March 2021 in One Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBCallie Babbitt
Callie Babbitt
SAShahana Althaf
Shahana Althaf
FRFernanda Cruz Rios
Fernanda Cruz Rios
MBMelissa M. Bilec
Melissa M. Bilec
TGThomas Graedel
Thomas Graedel

27 December 2022 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SLSina Leipold
Sina Leipold
APAnna Petit-Boix
Anna Petit-Boix
ALAnran Luo
Anran Luo
HHHanna Helander
Hanna Helander
MSMachteld Simoens
Machteld Simoens
BXBing Xue
Bing Xue
The current enthusiasm for the circular economy (CE) offers a unique opportunity to advance the impact of research on sustainability transitions. Diverse interpretations of CE by scholars, however, produce partly opposing assessments of its potential benefits, which can hinder progress. Here, we synthesize policy‐relevant lessons and research directions for a sustainable CE and identify three narratives—optimist, reformist, and skeptical—that underpin the ambiguity in CE assessments. Based on 54 key CE scholars’ insights, we identify three research needs: the articulation and discussion of ontologically distinct CE narratives; bridging of technical, managerial, socio‐economic, environmental, and political CE perspectives; and critical assessment of opportunities and limits of CE science–policy interactions. Our findings offer practical guidance for scholars to engage reflexively with the rapid expansion of CE knowledge, identify and pursue high‐impact research directions, and communicate more effectively with practitioners and policymakers.