Surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysm requires advanced technologies to achieve optimal results. Recently, rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) has been described to be an elegant technique that facilitates clip reconstruction of complex unruptured intracranial aneurysm (uIA). However, there is also a growing need for intraoperative tools to ensure safe clip reconstruction of complex ruptured intracranial aneurysm (rIA). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 17 patients who underwent RVP during surgical reconstruction of complex aneurysms. Nine patients had uIA while eight patients underwent surgery for rIA suffering from consecutive subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Hemodynamic data, critical events, laboratory results, and anesthesia-related complications were evaluated. No complications were reported concerning anesthesia induction and induction times were similar between patients exhibiting uIA or rIA (p = 0.08). RVP induced a significant decline of median arterial pressure (MAP) in both groups (p < 0.0001). However, median MAP before and after RVP was not different in both groups (uIA group: p = 0.27; rIA group: p = 0.18). Furthermore, high-sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT) levels were not increased after RVP in any group. One patient in the rIA group exhibited ventricular fibrillation and required cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but has presented with cardiac arrest due to SAH. Otherwise, no arrhythmias or complications occurred. In summary, our data suggest RVP to be feasible in surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world. Classic angina pectoris (AP) is a common reason to request prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). Nevertheless, data on diagnostic accuracy and common misdiagnoses are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the amount and variety of misdiagnoses and assess discriminating features. Methods: For this retrospective cohort study, all patients requiring EMS for suspected ACS in the city of Bonn (Germany) during 2018 were investigated. Prehospital and hospital medical records were reviewed regarding medical history, presenting signs and symptoms, as well as final diagnosis. Results: Out of 740 analyzed patients with prehospital suspected ACS, 283 (38.2%) were ultimately diagnosed with ACS (ACS group). Common diagnoses in the cohort with non-confirmed ACS (nACS group) consisted of unspecific pain syndromes, arrhythmias, hypertensive crises, and heart failure. ST segment elevation (adjusted odds-ratios [adj. OR] 2.70), male sex (adj. OR 1.71), T wave changes (adj. OR 1.27), angina pectoris (adj. OR 1.15) as well as syncope (adj. OR 0.63) were identified among others as informative predictors in a multivariable analysis using the lasso technique for data-driven variable selection. Conclusions: Misdiagnosed ACS is as common as 61.8% in this cohort and analyses point to a complex of conditions and symptoms (i.e., male sex, electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, AP) for correct ACS diagnosis while neurological symptoms were observed significantly more often in the nACS group (e.g., Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <15, p = 0.03). To ensure adequate and timely therapy for a potentially critical disease as ACS a profound prehospital examination and patient history is indispensable.

Objective: In cerebrovascular accidents symptoms, laboratory results and electrocardiogram (ECG) changes can mimic acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is subsumed as neurogenic stunned myocardium. So far, data regarding the frequency of cerebrovascular accidents misdiagnosed for ACS in a prehospital setting are missing. This study aims to quantify misdiagnoses and discover discriminating features.Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, prehospital and hospital medical records of all patients treated by physician-staffed emergency medical teams in the city of Bonn (Germany) with suspected ACS in 2018 were evaluated regarding medical history, prehospital symptoms and findings as well as hospital diagnoses.Results: From 758 patients admitted for presumed ACS, 9 patients (1.2%, 95% CI: 0.5–2.2%) suffered from acute cerebral disease (ACD group). Mainly, diagnoses were cerebrovascular accidents and one case of neuroborreliosis. A history of intracranial haemorrhage was found more often in the ACD group compared to the remaining cohort (OR 19, p = 0.01), while a history of arterial hypertension was less frequent (OR 0.22, p = 0.03). Presentation with headaches (OR 10.1, p = 0.03) or neurological symptoms (OR 16.9, p = 0.01) occurred more frequent in the ACD group. ECG changes were similar between groups.Conclusion: Acute cerebral disease misdiagnosed for ACS seems more common than assumed. Out of 758 patients with presumed ACS, 9 patients (1.2%) suffered from ACD, which were cerebrovascular accidents mainly. This is highly relevant, since prehospital treatment with heparin and acetylsalicylic acid is indicated in ACS but contraindicated in cerebrovascular accidents without further diagnostics. Thus, discriminating these patients is crucial. An attentive patient history and examination may be the key to differentiating ACD. Due to small ACD group size, further studies are needed.

Das Anästhesiologie-Team erwartet in der pädiatrischen Neurochirurgie ein breites Spektrum: Neben gesunden Kindern mit akuten Pathologien gibt es chronisch kranke oder syndromale Kinder mit wiederholten Operationen. Die chirurgischen Eingriffe können intrakraniell oder spinal, klein oder groß sein. Entsprechend umfangreich gestalten sich die präoperative Evaluation sowie die anästhesiologische Betreuung prä-, intra- und postoperativ. Paediatric neurosurgery presents a unique set for the anaesthesiologist, necessitating a patient tailored approach for a diverse population, ranging from neonates to adolescents and from healthy to chronically ill children. Understanding the intracranial compartment as the sum of brain tissue, blood volume and cerebral spinal fluid is essential. Given that approximately a quarter of a child’s cardiac output is dedicated to cerebral perfusion, intracranial bleeding might cumulate in haemorrhagic shock. Anaesthesiological measures to maintain homeostasis and their influences both on cerebral autoregulation and intracranial pressure need to be considered. Preoperative anaesthesiologic evaluation should incorporate neurological status and identification of underlying syndromes. Key perioperative considerations include airway management, strategic vascular access and haemotherapy. Anaesthetic requirements in common neurosurgical procedures for intracranial tumours, hydrocephalus, craniosynostosis as well as spinal surgery and traumatic brain injury are highlighted, while strategies to cope with complications such as seizure or air embolism are delineated. Article published online: 18 May 2026 © 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany