The study aimed to examine the learning curve and perioperative complications for laparoscopic pectopexy (LP). A total of 60 women with stage II–IV apical prolapse who underwent LP were dichotomized into groups: LSH(+) with concomitant laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH), LSH(−) after previous supracervical/total hysterectomy. Operative time, estimated blood loss and hospitalization length were evaluated with cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis and the Kwiatkowski–Phillips–Schmidt–Shin (KPSS) test, separately for two surgeons (A and B). Intraoperative and perioperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo (C–D) classification were analyzed. Mean operative time, change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative hospital stay were 143.5 ± 23.1 min—1.5 ± 0.5g/dL and 2.5 ± 0.9 days, respectively. LSH during pectopexy was associated with longer operative time (p = 0.01) but not with higher intraoperative bleeding or prolonged hospital stay. Severe complications rate was low (1.7%) with one bowel injury in LSH(−) (C–D grade IIIb). No C–D grade II, IV and V complications were found. Conversion to open pectopexy, return to the operating room or blood transfusion were not required. The KPSS test showed that a steady operative time for Surgeon A was achieved after 28 procedures. A proficiency for laparoscopic pectopexy based on CUSUM analysis was observed after 38–40 procedures.

The aim of this paper was to analyze perioperative and long-term outcomes in 114 women undergoing surgery for POP-Q ≥ 2 apical prolapse: sacrospinous ligament colpo/hysteropexy (SSLF/SSHP)—61; laparoscopic pectopexy (LP)—53. Validated questionnaires (PGI-I, ISI, #35 EPIQ, PFIQ-7, PFDI-20) were completed at baseline and follow-up. POP-Q stages II, III and IV were diagnosed in 1 (0.9%), 84 (73.7%) and 29 (25.4%) patients, respectively. Mean operative time and hospital stay were 151.8 ± 36.2 min/2.6 ± 1.1 days for LP and 69 ± 20.4 min (p < 0.001)/2.7 ± 1.0 days for SSLF. Severe intraoperative complications occurred in two (1.8%) patients. Mean follow-up was 26.9 ± 12 and 37.3 ± 17.5 months for LP and SSLF, respectively. At follow-up, significant improvement for all POP-Q points was observed in both groups (p < 0.001). Shortening of total vaginal length was found in both groups, but predominantly in SSLF patients (p = 0.01). The sensation of vaginal bulge (EPIQ) was reduced, and total PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores improved (p < 0.04) in both groups. Subjective success was reported by 40 (75.5%) LP and 44 (72.1%) SSLF patients. ISI detected no deterioration in urinary incontinence. PGI-I, PFDI-20, #35 EPIQ, PFIQ-7 and ISI did not differ between the groups. In conclusion both, SSLF and LP for apical prolapse generate good anatomical and subjective outcomes, with protective effect on the anterior compartment observed for LP.

This case report describes a pregnant woman who underwent a laparoscopic MiniMizer Gastric Ring procedure for clinically severe obesity only one month before conception. At 31 weeks of gestation, the patient as admitted to the hospital with postprandial vomiting and persistent left-sided colicky abdominal pain. Maternal abdominal MRI revealed an intestinal obstruction and elective surgery was recommended. Due to the considerable risk to the fetus, antenatal corticosteroids were immediately administered to promote lung maturation and magnesium sulfate was started for fetal neuroprotection. During an exploratory laparoscopy, significantly enlarged and ischemic intestinal loops were found, leading to the decision to perform an atraumatic “en caul” cesarean delivery. After a successful “en caul” delivery, the MiniMizer ring, which had dislodged downwards and led to mesenteric ischemia, was visualized. Intraoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a 1cm defect in the stomach wall related to gastric ring, covered with purulent exudate. Further exploration, showed a herniation of the distal alimentary loop through the Petersen foramen. Successful management included ring removal and intestinal loop reduction from the Petersen’s space, without evidence of strangulation, as confirmed with indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. The postoperative course was uneventful. Women with obesity who have undergone bariatric surgery should to be informed of the increased likelihood of becoming pregnant after treatment. It is advised to notify the patient of the importance of maintaining a sufficient interval between bariatric surgery and conception. Additionally reports from the literature on various complications during pregnancy after bariatric surgery are presented.