The best assay or marker to define mRNA-1273 vaccine–induced antibodies as a correlate of protection (CoP) is unclear. In the COVE trial, participants received two doses of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine or placebo. We previously assessed IgG binding antibodies to the spike protein (spike IgG) or receptor binding domain (RBD IgG) and pseudovirus neutralizing antibody 50 or 80% inhibitory dilution titer measured on day 29 or day 57, as correlates of risk (CoRs) and CoPs against symptomatic COVID-19 over 4 months after dose. Here, we assessed a new marker, live virus 50% microneutralization titer (LV-MN ₅₀ ), and compared and combined markers in multivariable analyses. LV-MN ₅₀ was an inverse CoR, with a hazard ratio of 0.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.83) at day 29 and 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 1.04) at day 57 per 10-fold increase. In multivariable analyses, pseudovirus neutralization titers and anti-spike binding antibodies performed best as CoRs; combining antibody markers did not improve correlates. Pseudovirus neutralization titer was the strongest independent correlate in a multivariable model. Overall, these results supported pseudovirus neutralizing and binding antibody assays as CoRs and CoPs, with the live virus assay as a weaker correlate in this sample set. Day 29 markers performed as well as day 57 markers as CoPs, which could accelerate immunogenicity and immunobridging studies.

The need for an efficacious vaccine against highly pathogenic filoviruses was reinforced by the recent and devastating 2014–2016 outbreak of Ebola virus (EBOV) disease in Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia that resulted in more than 10,000 casualties. Such a vaccine would need to be vetted through a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) traditional, accelerated, or Animal Rule or similar European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory pathway. Under the FDA Animal Rule, vaccine-induced immune responses correlating with survival of non-human primates (NHPs), or another well-characterized animal model, following lethal EBOV challenge will need to be bridged to human immune response distributions in clinical trials. When possible, species-neutral methods are ideal for detection and bridging of these immune responses, such as methods to quantify anti-EBOV glycoprotein (GP) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. Further, any method that will be used to support advanced clinical and non-clinical trials will most likely require formal validation to assess suitability prior to use. Reported here is the development, qualification, and validation of a Filovirus Animal Nonclinical Group anti-EBOV GP IgG Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (FANG anti-EBOV GP IgG ELISA) for testing human serum samples.

Marburg virus (MARV) is a virus of high human consequence with a case fatality rate of 24–88%. The global health and national security risks posed by Marburg virus disease (MVD) underscore the compelling need for a prophylactic vaccine, but no candidate has yet reached regulatory approval. Here, we evaluate a replication-defective chimpanzee adenovirus type 3 (ChAd3)-vectored MARV Angola glycoprotein (GP)-expressing vaccine against lethal MARV challenge in macaques. The ChAd3 platform has previously been reported to protect against the MARV-related viruses, Ebola virus (EBOV) and Sudan virus (SUDV), and MARV itself in macaques, with immunogenicity demonstrated in macaques and humans. In this study, we present data showing 100% protection against MARV Angola challenge (versus 0% control survival) and associated production of GP-specific IgGs generated by the ChAd3-MARV vaccine following a single dose of 1 × 10¹¹ virus particles prepared in a new clinical formulation buffer designed to enhance product stability. These results are consistent with previously described data using the same vaccine in a different formulation and laboratory, demonstrating the reproducible and robust protective efficacy elicited by this promising vaccine for the prevention of MVD. Additionally, a qualified anti-GP MARV IgG ELISA was developed as a critical pre-requisite for clinical advancement and regulatory approval.

Recent studies have shown the domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo) to be a promising small animal model for the study of Ebola virus (EBOV) disease and medical countermeasure evaluation. To date, most studies have focused on traditional challenge routes, predominantly intramuscular and intranasal administration. Here, we present results from a non-clinical pathogenicity study examining oronasal, oral, and ocular mucosal challenge routes in ferrets. Animals were challenged with 1, 10, or 100 plaque forming units EBOV followed by monitoring of disease progression and biosampling. Ferrets administered virus via oronasal and oral routes met euthanasia criteria due to advanced disease 5–10 days post-challenge. Conversely, all ferrets dosed via the ocular route survived until the scheduled study termination 28-day post-challenge. In animals that succumbed to disease, a dose/route response was not observed; increases in disease severity, febrile responses, serum and tissue viral load, alterations in clinical pathology, and gross/histopathology findings were similar between subjects. Disease progression in ferrets challenged via ocular administration was unremarkable throughout the study period. Results from this study further support the ferret as a model for EBOV disease following oral and nasal mucosa exposure.

Since the discovery of the Marburg virus (MARV) in 1967 and Ebola virus (EBOV) in 1976, there have been over 40 reported outbreaks of filovirus disease with case fatality rates greater than 50%. This underscores the need for efficacious vaccines against these highly pathogenic filoviruses. Due to the sporadic and unpredictable nature of filovirus outbreaks, such a vaccine would likely need to be vetted through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), following the Animal Rule or similar European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory pathway. Under the FDA Animal Rule, vaccine-induced immune responses correlating with survival of non-human primates (NHPs), or another well-characterized animal model, following lethal challenge, will need to be bridged for human immune response distributions in clinical trials. A correlate of protection has not yet been identified for the filovirus disease, but antibodies, specifically anti-glycoprotein (GP) antibodies, are believed to be critical in providing protection against the filovirus disease following vaccination and are thus a strong candidate for a correlate of protection. Thus, species-neutral methods capable of the detection and bridging of these antibody immune responses, such as methods to quantify anti-GP immunoglobulin G (IgG)-binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies, are needed. Reported here is the development and qualification of two Filovirus Animal Nonclinical Group (FANG) anti-GP IgG Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs) to quantify anti-MARV and anti-Sudan virus (SUDV) IgG antibodies in human and NHP serum samples, as well as the development of pseudovirion neutralization assays (PsVNAs) to quantify MARV- and SUDV-neutralizing antibodies in human and NHP serum samples.

The need for an efficacious vaccine against highly pathogenic filoviruses was reinforced by the devastating 2014–2016 outbreak of Ebola virus (EBOV) disease (EVD) in Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia that resulted in over 28,000 cases and over 11,300 deaths. In addition, the 2018–2020 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo currently has over 3,400 cases and over 2,200 deaths. A fully licensed vaccine and at least one other investigational vaccine are being deployed to combat this EVD outbreak. To support vaccine development and pre-clinical/clinical testing a Filovirus Animal Nonclinical Group (FANG) human anti-EBOV GP IgG ELISA was developed to measure anti-EBOV GP IgG antibodies. This ELISA is currently being used in multiple laboratories. Reported here is a characterization of an interlaboratory statistical analysis of the human anti-EBOV GP IgG ELISA as part of a collaborative study between five participating laboratories. Each laboratory used similar method protocols and reagents to measure anti-EBOV GP IgG levels in human serum samples from a proficiency panel consisting of ten serum samples created by the differential dilution of a serum sample positive for anti-GP IgG antibodies (BMIZAIRE105) with negative serum (BMI529). The total assay variability (inter- and intra-assay variability) %CVs observed at each laboratory ranged from 12.2 to 30.6. Intermediate precision (inter-assay variability) for the laboratory runs ranged from 8.9 to 21.7%CV and repeatability (intra-assay variability) %CVs ranged from 7.2 to 23.7. The estimated slope for the relationship between log₁₀(Target Concentration) and the log₁₀(Observed Concentration) across all five laboratories was 0.95 with a 90% confidence interval of (0.93, 0.97). Equivalence test results showed that the 90% confidence interval for the ratios for the sample-specific mean concentrations at the five individual labs to the overall laboratory consensus value were within the equivalence bounds of 0.80 to 1.25 for each laboratory and test sample, except for six test samples from Lab D, two samples from Lab B1, and one sample from Lab B2. The mean laboratory concentrations for Lab D were less than those from the other laboratories by 20% on average across the serum samples. The evaluation of the proficiency panel at these laboratories provides a limited assessment of assay precision (intermediate precision, repeatability, and total assay variability), dilutional linearity, and accuracy. This evaluation suggests that the within-laboratory performance of the anti-EBOV GP IgG ELISA as implemented at the five laboratories is consistent with the intended use of the assay based on the acceptance criteria used by laboratories that have validated the assay. However, the assessment of between-laboratory performance revealed lower observed concentrations at Lab D and greater variability in assay results at Lab B1 relative to other laboratories.