David Q. Andrews

Dr. David Q. Andrews


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2008 in The Journal of Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGemma C. Solomon
Gemma C. Solomon
DADavid Q. Andrews
David Q. Andrews
THThorsten Hansen
Thorsten Hansen
RGRandall H. Goldsmith
Randall H. Goldsmith
MWMichael R. Wasielewski
Michael R. Wasielewski
MRMark A. Ratner
Mark A. Ratner
Theory and experiment examining electron transfer through molecules bound to electrodes are increasingly focused on quantities that are conceptually far removed from current chemical understanding. This presents challenges both for the design of interesting molecules for these devices and for the interpretation of experimental data by traditional chemical mechanisms. Here, the concept of electronic coupling from theories of intramolecular electron transfer is extended and applied in the scattering theory (Landauer) formalism. This yields a simple sum over independent channels, that is then used to interpret and explain the unusual features of junction transport through cross-conjugated molecules and the differences among benzene rings substituted at the ortho, meta, or para positions.

14 October 2020 in Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADavid Q. Andrews
David Q. Andrews
ONOlga V. Naidenko
Olga V. Naidenko

21 November 2008 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGemma C. Solomon
Gemma C. Solomon
DADavid Q. Andrews
David Q. Andrews
RGRandall H. Goldsmith
Randall H. Goldsmith
THThorsten Hansen
Thorsten Hansen
MWMichael R. Wasielewski
Michael R. Wasielewski
MRMark A. Ratner
Mark A. Ratner

23 June 2017 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RHRolf U. Halden
Rolf U. Halden
ALAvery E. Lindeman
Avery E. Lindeman
AAAllison E. Aiello
Allison E. Aiello
DADavid Q. Andrews
David Q. Andrews
WAWilliam A. Arnold
William A. Arnold
ABArlene Blum
Arlene Blum
The Florence Statement on Triclosan and Triclocarban documents a consensus of more than 200 scientists and medical professionals on the hazards of and lack of demonstrated benefit from common uses of triclosan and triclocarban. These chemicals may be used in thousands of personal care and consumer products as well as in building materials. Based on extensive peer-reviewed research, this statement concludes that triclosan and triclocarban are environmentally persistent endocrine disruptors that bioaccumulate in and are toxic to aquatic and other organisms. Evidence of other hazards to humans and ecosystems from triclosan and triclocarban is presented along with recommendations intended to prevent future harm from triclosan, triclocarban, and antimicrobial substances with similar properties and effects. Because antimicrobials can have unintended adverse health and environmental impacts, they should only be used when they provide an evidence-based health benefit. Greater transparency is needed in product formulations, and before an antimicrobial is incorporated into a product, the long-term health and ecological impacts should be evaluated. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1788.

27 December 2022 in Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NBNadia Barbo
Nadia Barbo
TSTasha Stoiber
Tasha Stoiber
ONOlga V. Naidenko
Olga V. Naidenko
DADavid Q. Andrews
David Q. Andrews
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, gained significant public and regulatory attention due to widespread contamination and health harms associated with exposure. Ingestion of PFAS from contaminated food and water results in the accumulation of PFAS in the body and is considered a key route of human exposure. Here we calculate the potential contribution of PFOS from consumption of locally caught freshwater fish to serum levels. We analyzed data for over 500 composite samples of fish fillets collected across the United States from 2013 to 2015 under the U.S. EPA's monitoring programs, the National Rivers and Streams Assessment and the Great Lakes Human Health Fish Fillet Tissue Study. The two datasets indicate that an individual's consumption of freshwater fish is potentially a significant source of exposure to perfluorinated compounds. The median level of total targeted PFAS in fish fillets from rivers and streams across the United States was 9,500 ng/kg, with a median level of 11,800 ng/kg in the Great Lakes. PFOS was the largest contributor to total PFAS levels, averaging 74% of the total. The median levels of total detected PFAS in freshwater fish across the United States were 278 times higher than levels in commercially relevant fish tested by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2019-2022. Exposure assessment suggests that a single serving of freshwater fish per year with the median level of PFAS as detected by the U.S. EPA monitoring programs translates into a significant increase of PFOS levels in blood serum. The exposure to chemical pollutants in freshwater fish across the United States is a case of environmental injustice that especially affects communities that depend on fishing for sustenance and for traditional cultural practices. Identifying and reducing sources of PFAS exposure is an urgent public health priority.

Alexis TemkinAlexis Temkin
Alexis Temkin
BHBarbara A. Hocevar
Barbara A. Hocevar
DADavid Q. Andrews
David Q. Andrews
ONOlga V. Naidenko
Olga V. Naidenko
LKLisa Kamendulis
Lisa Kamendulis
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) constitute a large class of environmentally persistent chemicals used in industrial and consumer products. Human exposure to PFAS is extensive, and PFAS contamination has been reported in drinking water and food supplies as well as in the serum of nearly all people. The most well-studied member of the PFAS class, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), induces tumors in animal bioassays and has been associated with elevated risk of cancer in human populations. GenX, one of the PFOA replacement chemicals, induces tumors in animal bioassays as well. Using the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens framework for cancer hazard identification, we considered the existing epidemiological, toxicological and mechanistic data for 26 different PFAS. We found strong evidence that multiple PFAS induce oxidative stress, are immunosuppressive, and modulate receptor-mediated effects. We also found suggestive evidence indicating that some PFAS can induce epigenetic alterations and influence cell proliferation. Experimental data indicate that PFAS are not genotoxic and generally do not undergo metabolic activation. Data are currently insufficient to assess whether any PFAS promote chronic inflammation, cellular immortalization or alter DNA repair. While more research is needed to address data gaps, evidence exists that several PFAS exhibit one or more of the key characteristics of carcinogens.