Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation remains the most potent curative therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) due to the graft-versus-tumor effect provided by donor cells. Donor chimerism is utilized early after transplantation to evaluate engraftment and to monitor the persistence of donor hematopoiesis. Literature is conflicting regarding to the prognostic utility of early mixed donor chimerism, chimerism kinetic patterns as well as factors associated with it and we sought to clarify this uncertainty. In this single-centre retrospective analysis, 141 adults aged 18 years of age or older with AML (n=104) and MDS (n=37) who received their first transplant from HLA matched related, matched unrelated or mismatched related (haploidentical) donors between 2016 and 2022 and had at least day 30 chimerism measured were included. Approximately 30% received post-transplant cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and 67% of subjects received reduced-intensity conditioning. Chimerism was measured using STR-PCR from unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (whole blood; WB) and CD3+ (T cell; TC) compartment at each time point. Complete donor chimerism was defined as ≥95% whereas <95% defined as mixed. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate cumulative incidence of relapse with kinetic calculations completed using an increment factor. Kaplan-Meier was used for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore prognostic factors for OS and RFS. Both day 30 mixed WB and TC donor chimerism were individually associated with an increased risk of relapse and worse overall and relapse-free survival at days 30, 60 and 90 post-transplant. Day 30 mixed WB was more specific for relapse (86%), while mixed TC was more sensitive (67%). Complete day 30 chimerism had a negative predictive value of 63% and 70% and positive predictive value of 57% and 67% for WB and TC, respectively. Day 30 WB and TC donor chimerism of <88.92% and 89.29% had specificities of 79.17% and 82.19% although sensitivities only approximated 50%. Evaluating the kinetics of chimerism over the first 90 days provided additional information for prognosticating relapse than absolute chimerism values at individual time points in both WB day 30 to 90 [HR, 1.75 (95% CI, 1.04-2.94); p<0.035] and TC day 60 to 90 [HR, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.03, 1.69); p<0.29]. Twice as many patients with complete chimerism developed acute GVHD compared to those with mixed chimerism. Factors that were found to be associated with day 30 mixed TC chimerism were donor source, ATG GVHD prophylaxis, myeloablative conditioning and female sex, while only donor source was associated with mixed WB. Both TC and WB day 30 mixed chimerism were associated with an increased risk of relapse. Early mixed WB and TC chimerism is strongly associated with a worse overall and relapse-free survival. The serial measurement of chimerism early post-transplant for monitoring chimerism kinetics provides additional prognostic information beyond the absolute donor chimerism value at a single time point. Haploidentical stem cell transplants were associated with a lower likelihood of mixed chimerism than other donor sources.

Measurable (minimal) residual disease (MRD) is an established, key prognostic factor in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), and testing for MRD is known to be an important tool to help guide treatment decisions. The clinical value of MRD testing depends on the accuracy and reliability of results. Currently, there are no Canadian provincial or national guidelines for MRD testing in adult B-ALL, and consistent with the absence of such guidelines, there is no uniform Ontario MRD testing consensus. Moreover, there is great variability in Ontario in MRD testing with respect to where, when, and by which technique, MRD testing is performed, as well as in how the results are interpreted. To address these deficiencies, an expert multidisciplinary working group was convened to define consensus recommendations for improving the provision of such testing. The expert panel recommends that MRD testing should be implemented in a centralized manner to ensure expertise and accuracy in testing for this low volume indication, thereby to provide accurate, reliable results to clinicians and patients. All adult patients with B-ALL should receive MRD testing after induction chemotherapy. Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive patients should have ongoing monitoring of MRD during treatment and thereafter, while samples from Ph-negative B-ALL patients should be tested at least once later during treatment, ideally at 12 to 16 weeks after treatment initiation. In Ph-negative adult B-ALL patients, standardized, ideally centralized, protocols must be used for MRD testing, including both flow cytometry and immunoglobulin (Ig) heavy chain and T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement analysis. For Ph-positive B-ALL patients, MRD testing using a standardized protocol for reverse transcription real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for the BCR-ABL1 gene fusion transcript is recommended, with Ig/TCR gene rearrangement analysis done in parallel likely providing additional clinical information.

We present a case of a 34-year old G1P0 female with twin-gestation and positive prenatal screening. Initial ultrasounds demonstrated a normal live fetus with an indeterminate but persistent placental lesion. The patient presented at 23 weeks of gestational age with vaginal bleeding. On examination, a 2 cm vaginal lesion was identified. Further cross-sectional imaging demonstrated a normal appearing fetus with a mixed solid and cystic placental lesion as well as an additional lesion in the vagina. Metastatic workup revealed diffuse pulmonary metastases. Intravascular embolization was carried out to minimize the bleeding from the vaginal lesion, followed by the delivery of the fetus with an urgent Caesarean section and treatment with chemotherapy. Pathology and genetics testing confirmed diagnosis of a complete molar pregnancy with a coexisting live fetus. This case highlights the importance of any unexpected findings within the placenta or the uterus in a pregnant patient. The radiologist should maintain a high index of suspicion for gestational trophoblastic disease in such cases, communicate clearly with the clinical team and suggest appropriate additional imaging.

Molecular biomarkers, such as IDH1/IDH2 mutations and 1p19q co-deletion, are included in the histopathological and clinical criteria currently used to diagnose and classify gliomas. IDH1/IDH2 mutation is a common feature of gliomas and is associated with a glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Aberrant genomic methylation patterns can also be used to extrapolate information about copy number variation in a tumor. This project’s goal was to assess the feasibility of DNA methylation array for the simultaneous detection of glioma biomarkers as a more effective testing strategy compared to existing single analyte tests. Methods: Whole-genome methylation array (WGMA) testing was performed using 48 glioma DNA samples to detect methylation aberrations and chromosomal gains and losses. The analyzed samples include 39 tumors in the discovery cohort and 9 tumors in the replication cohort. Methylation profiles for each sample were correlated with IDH1 p.R132G mutation, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and previous 1p19q clinical testing to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the WGMA assay for the detection of these variants. Results: We developed a DNA methylation signature to specifically distinguish a IDH1/IDH2 mutant tumor from normal samples. This signature is composed of 11 CpG sites that were significantly hypermethylated in the IDH1/IDH2 mutant group. Copy number analysis using WGMA data was able to identify five of five positive samples for 1p19q co-deletion and was concordant for all negative samples. Conclusions: The DNA methylation signature presented here has the potential to refine the utility of WGMA to predict IDH1/IDH2 mutation status of gliomas, thus improving diagnostic yield and efficiency of laboratory testing compared to single analyte IDH1/IDH2 or 1p19q tests.

Background: Loss of function variants and whole gene deletions of ZNF462 has been associated with a novel phenotype of developmental delay/intellectual disability and distinctive facial features. Over two dozen cases have been reported to date and the condition is now known as Weiss‐Kruszka syndrome (OMIM# 618619). There are several older reports in the literature and DECIPER detailing individuals with interstitial deletions of 9q31 involving the ZNF462 gene. Many of the characteristic facial features described in these microdeletion cases are similar to those who have been diagnosed with Weiss‐Kruszka syndrome.Methods: We describe three additional patients with overlapping 9q31 deletions and compare the phenotypes of the microdeletion cases reported in the literature to Weiss‐Kruszka syndrome.Results: Phenotypic overlap was observed between patients with 9q31 deletions and Weiss‐Kruszka syndrome. Several additional features were noted in 9q31 deletion patients, including hearing loss, small head circumference, palate abnormalities and short stature.Conclusions: The common region of overlap of microdeletion cases implicates ZNF462 as the main driver of the recognizable 9q31 microdeletion phenotype. The observation of additional features in patients with 9q31 microdeletions that are not reported in Weiss‐Kruszka syndrome further suggests that other genes from the 9q31 region likely act synergistically with ZNF462 to affect phenotypic expression.