Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is an indicator of right ventricular (RV) function and an independent predictor of right ventricular failure (RVF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Administration of vasodilator challenge during right heart catheterization (RHC) could reduce RV workload allowing a better assessment of its functional reserve. Patients undergoing LVAD implantation at our Institution between May 2013 and August 2021 were enrolled. Only patients who had undergone RHC and vasodilator challenge with sodium nitroprusside were analyzed. We collected all available clinical, instrumental, and haemodynamic parameters, at baseline and after nitroprusside infusion and evaluated potential associations with post-LVAD RVF. Of the 54 patients analyzed, 19 (35%) developed RVF after LVAD implantation. Fractional area change (FAC) (OR: 0.647, CI: 0.481–0.871; P = 0.004), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (OR: 0.856, CI: 0.761–0.964; P = 0.010), and post-sodium nitroprusside (NTP) PAPi (OR: 0.218, CI: 0.073–0.653; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of post-LVAD RVF. The model combining FAC, PASP, and post-NTP PAPi demonstrated a predictive accuracy of 90.7%. Addition of post-NTP PAPi significantly increased the predictive accuracy of the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support right-sided heart failure risk score [79.4 vs. 70.4%; area under the curve (AUC): 0.841 vs. 0.724, P = 0.022] and the CRITT score (79.6% vs. 74%; AUC: 0.861 vs. 0.767 P = 0.033). Post-NTP PAPi has observed to be an independent predictor of RVF following LVAD implantation. Dynamic assessment of PAPi using a vasodilator challenge may represent a method of testing RV functional reserve in candidates for LVAD implantation. Larger and prospective studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. RV FAC, right ventricular fractional area change; PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure; PAPi, pulmonary artery pulsatility index; RVF, right ventricular failure; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; NTP, sodium nitroprusside.

Background: Circulatory support escalation is often required during cardiogenic shock (CS) treatment. Currently, no large-scale data is available to inform how escalation strategies integrate in contemporary CS management and affect outcomes. Methods: We assessed the frequency, outcomes, and prognostic implications of escalation from a retrospective international registry of CS patients from 4 cardiac intensive care units. Escalation was defined as any incremental change in the circulatory support strategy after an initial bundle of care was established for at least 4 hours. Results: Among 602 consecutive CS patients, escalation was required in 30%. Patients were escalated to inotropes/vasopressors (36%), IABP (39%), Impella (14%) or V-A ECMO (11%). Escalation was associated with a higher hospital mortality rate (43% vs 21%; p <0.001; OR _adj 3.42; 95% CI 2.21-3.35) and a greater transition to heart replacement therapies (23% vs 5%; p <0.001; OR _adj 6.01; 95% CI 3.31-11.27), when adjusted for age, sex, chronic kidney disease, markers of CS severity on admission, CS etiology, and admission source. Escalation was associated with a higher risk of complications including acute kidney injury, major bleeding, and stroke. These outcomes occurred more frequently with high-profile mechanical circulatory support (Impella, V-A ECMO). Complications mediated 24% (95%CI 9-40%) of the association between escalation and hospital death. Escalated patients were successfully discharged alive in 42%. Age, SCAI B to C stage at escalation, TAPSE at escalation, and mean urinary output ≥1 mL/kg/hour in the 6 hours preceding escalation were independently associated with successful escalation when adjusted for sex, chronic kidney disease, and markers of CS severity on admission and at time of escalation. Conclusions: Circulatory support escalation is prevalent in patients treated for CS. Escalation is associated with a higher risk of hospital death, complications and transition to HRT, consistently with the intrinsically higher risk profile and expected trajectory of escalated patients. However, outcomes may differ according to the specific escalation strategy. Resorting to escalation in younger patients, in less severe CS stages, when the right ventricular function and urinary output are still preserved is associated with a higher chance of subsequent survival.

Background: Pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea) is a helpful parameter to predict the risk of acute postoperative right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A new method for calculating Ea, obtained by the ratio between transpulmonary gradient and stroke volume (Ea^B), has been proposed as a more accurate measure than the Ea obtained as the ratio between pulmonary artery systolic pressure and stroke volume (Ea^C). However, the role of Ea^B in predicting acute RVF post-LVAD implantation remains unclear. Methods and Results: A total of 35 patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed in this retrospective analysis. Acute RVF after LVAD implantation occurred in 12 patients (34%): 5 patients with moderate RVF (14% of total) and 7 patients with severe RVF. The Ea^B was not significantly different between the “severe RVF” vs. “not-severe RVF” groups (0.27 ± 0.04 vs 0.23 ± 0.1, p < 0.403). However, the combination of arterial elastance and central venous pressure was significantly different between the “not-severe RVF” group (central venous pressure < 14 mmHg and Ea^C < 0.88 mmHg/mL or Ea^B < 0.24 mmHg/mL; p < 0.005) and the “severe RVF” group (central venous pressure > 14 mmHg and Ea^C > 0.88 mmHg/mL or Ea^B > 0.24 mmHg/mL; p < 0.005). Conclusions: Ea is a reliable parameter of right ventricular afterload and helps discriminate the risk of acute RVF after LVAD implantation. The combined analysis of Ea and central venous pressure can also risk stratify patients undergoing LVAD implantation for the development of RVF.

Vasodilator challenge during right heart catheterization (RHC), by improving right ventricular (RV) loading conditions, could provide an assessment of RV functional reserve. We hypothesized that a dynamic evaluation of RV function with sodium nitroprusside (NTP) infusion could enhance conventional risk stratification for post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) early RV failure (RVF). We performed an observational retrospective multicenter study including consecutive LVAD recipients undergoing vasodilator challenge within 3 months from surgery. We evaluated the association of clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic data at baseline and after NTP infusion with post-LVAD early RVF. Of 160 patients, RVF occurred in 58 (36.3%) and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (32.8% vs . 3.9%, p < 0.001). Among baseline hemodynamics, pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) <2 was the single variable associated with RVF ( p = 0.038). In a multivariable model adjusted for in-study outcome predictors, a blunted PAPi response to vasodilator challenge (PAPi increase <2.2) emerged as the strongest independent RVF predictor (odds ratio [OR] = 4.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.88–11.07, p = 0.001). Patients with a blunted PAPi response had an increased RVF risk both in the baseline PAPi <2 (61.9% vs . 12.5%, p = 0.022) and in the baseline PAPi ≥2 (40.2% vs . 17.5%, p = 0.004) groups. Vasodilator challenge, by unveiling RV functional reserve, could improve patient selection and optimization before LVAD implant.