Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is a powerful tool for postnatal genetic diagnosis, but relevant clinical studies in the field of prenatal diagnosis are limited. The present study aimed to prospectively evaluate the utility of WGS compared with chromosomal microarray (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES) in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies. We performed trio WGS (≈40-fold) in parallel with CMA in 111 fetuses with structural or growth anomalies, and sequentially performed WES when CMA was negative (CMA plus WES). In comparison, WGS not only detected all pathogenic genetic variants in 22 diagnosed cases identified by CMA plus WES, yielding a diagnostic rate of 19.8% (22/110), but also provided additional and clinically significant information, including a case of balanced translocations and a case of intrauterine infection, which might not be detectable by CMA or WES. WGS also required less DNA (100 ng) as input and could provide a rapid turnaround time (TAT, 18 ± 6 days) compared with that (31 ± 8 days) of the CMA plus WES. Our results showed that WGS provided more comprehensive and precise genetic information with a rapid TAT and less DNA required than CMA plus WES, which enables it as an alternative prenatal diagnosis test for fetal structural anomalies.

(1) Background: Numerous etiologies may lead to non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF). However, the causes remain unclear in half of NIHF cases following current standard assessment. The application of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES) can improve the identification of the etiologies. This study aimed to investigate the etiologies of NIHF in the era of next-generation sequence (NGS) following a unified prenatal work-up flow for diagnosis. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on NIHF cases that were collected prospectively to explore the underlying etiologies according to a unified prenatal diagnosis work-up flow at Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital between Jan 2016 and Dec 2019. The medical records for all NIHF cases were reviewed, and the causes of NIHF were classified as confirmed (diagnostic), suspected, or unknown. (3) Results: Prenatal and postnatal medical records for a total of 145 NIHF cases were reviewed, 48.3% (70/145) of the cases were identified to be with confirmed etiologies, and 10.3% (15/145) with suspected etiologies. Among 85 cases with confirmed or suspected etiologies, 44.7% were diagnosed with genetic disorders, 20% with chylothorax/chyloascites diagnosed postnatally, 12.9% with fetal structural anomalies, 12.9% with fetal anemia, 7% (6 cases) with fetal arrhythmia, and 2.3% (2 cases) with placenta chorioangioma. In cases with genetic disorders, 8 aneuploidies were detected by CMA, and 30 cases had single-gene disorders identified by ES (29/30) or targeted gene panel (1/30). There were still 41.4% cases (60/145) with unknown causes after this unified prenatal diagnostic work-up flow. (4) Conclusions: In the era of NGS, the causes of NIHF were identified in 58.6% of cases, with genetic disorders being the most common ones. NGS is helpful in determining the genetic etiology of NIHF when CMA results cannot explain NIHF, but 41.4% of cases were still with unknown causes under the unified prenatal diagnostic work-up flow in this single-center study.