(1) Background: This article aims to answer the question of whether the Republic of Poland, by stipulating in the Constitution of 1997 the principle of sustainable development and ecological security, has created favourable conditions for the development of renewable energy. (2) Methods: The research is conducted using descriptive methods and—due to the legal nature of the publication and the crucial role played by the dogmatic method—it consists of the interpretation of legal acts and court decisions. (3) Results: Over the last few years, state authorities have introduced a number of regulatory and legal mechanisms to increase the stability of the operation of renewable energy sources, including the development of biomass or geothermal energy, as well as the development of energy clusters and cooperatives. This article characterises specific solutions and assesses their effectiveness. (4) Conclusions: The state authorities should take further specific actions aimed at achieving the sustainable development of the renewable energy sector in Poland. These actions should be primarily aimed at the use of huge resources of renewable energy sources, saving the consumption of energy resources, reducing the demand for final energy, gradually converting electricity production from coal to renewable energy sources (RES), and moving away from fossil fuels for heat production in favour of RES.

Extraordinary circumstances, and the COVID-19 pandemic undoubtedly meets this criterion, require extraordinary solutions to be adopted, extending to the state decision-making process to prevent such crises from escalating. For this reason, the introduction of the possibility of holding a remote session of the Sejm seemed a reasonable move from an epidemiological point of view, but in practice, it proved to be a great challenge, not only from an organisational and technological point of view, but also in terms of ensuring respect for fundamental legislative principles. The aim of this article is to show how the current parliamentary majority has instrumentally played on the Parliament and the legislative process under the guise of fighting against the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic to gain makeshift political benefits, without any regard for the standards of law-making in a democratic rule of law state.

Abstrakt Bezpieczeństwo jest procesem złożonym, w którym ścierają się funkcjonujące wyzwania i zagrożenia, percepcja społeczna i koncepcje ich rozwiązywania oraz działania i oddziaływania państw oraz instytucji międzynarodowych, zmierzające do budowania ich pewności przetrwania, posiadania i swobód rozwojowych. W takim ujęciu bezpieczeństwo jest jedną z fundamentalnych potrzeb podmiotu i zarazem jednym z najważniejszych celów jego działania, niezależnie od tego, czy podmiotem tym jest jednostka ludzka, czy państwo. Również znaczenie etymologiczne pojęcia bezpieczeństwa (w dosłownym tłumaczeniu bezpieczeństwo to nic innego jak brak zmartwień,poczucia strachu czy obaw) wskazuje na jego podmiotowy charakter związany z brakiem zagrożeń oraz poczuciem pewności podmiotu.

The Debudgetisation of Public Finances in Poland After Covid‐19 and the War in Ukraine | Article | Politics and Governance

Guarantees of independence of the Supreme Audit Institutions of the EU Member States – a comparative legal analysis