The induction of wound healing by insulin‑like growth factor‑I (IGF‑I) has been demonstrated in several animal studies; however, there are disproportionately fewer studies assessing its value in humans. The aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive summary of all the available evidence pertaining to the effects of IGF‑I administration on the process of wound anaplasias, both in human tissues in vivo and in cells in vitro. A systematic search of Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar was performed for relevant studies published until May 2020. Overall, 11 studies were included. Of these, 2 studies were conducted in human subjects, whereas the rest of them were performed using in vitro models of human cell lines. All studies demonstrated a positive association between IGF‑I and wound anaplasias; IGF‑I promoted the migration of keratinocytes, thus playing an important role in wound epithelialization as well as enabling wound bed contraction, and it also stimulated hyaluronan synthesis. The wound healing‑promoting effect of IGF‑I may be a great asset in dealing with the healing of challenging wounds; thus, this type of treatment could be extremely useful in addressing patients with large burn wounds, chronic diabetic ulcers and patients with impaired wound healing. Nevertheless, the route of recombinant IGF‑I administration, the recommended dosage, as well as the indications for clinical use of this growth factor remain to be determined and thus, additional clinical trials are required, with a focus on the medical use of recombinant IGF‑I in wound anaplasias.

Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Background: Despite the pivotal role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer staging and evaluation, the reliability of restaging MRI after neoadjuvant therapy is still debatable. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of restaging MRI by comparing post‐neoadjuvant MRI findings with those of the final pathology.Methods: This study was a retrospective review of the medical records of adult rectal cancer patients who had restaging MRI following neoadjuvant therapy and prior to rectal cancer resection in a NAPRC‐certified rectal cancer centre between 2016 and 2021. The study compared findings of preoperative, post‐neoadjuvant MRI with final pathology relative to T stage, N stage, tumour size, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) status.Results: A total of 126 patients were included in the study. We found fair concordance (kappa −0.316) for T stage between restaging MRI and pathology report, and slight concordance for N stage and CRM status (kappa −0.11, kappa = 0.089, respectively). Concordance rates were lower for patients following total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) or with a low rectal tumour. In total, 73% of patients with positive N pathology status had negative N status in the restaging MRI. Sensitivity and specificity regarding positive CRM in post‐neoadjuvant treatment MRI were 45.45% and 70.4%, respectively.Conclusion: We found low concordance levels between restaging MRI and pathology regarding TN stage and CRM status. Concordance levels were even lower for patients after TNT regimen and with a low rectal tumour. In the era of TNT and watch‐and‐wait approach, we should not rely solely on restaging MRI to make post‐neoadjuvant treatment decisions.