Background: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) is an effective therapy for high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) but heart failure (HF) readmissions and death remain substantial on mid-term follow-up. Recently, right ventricular (RV) to pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling has emerged as a relevant prognostic predictor in HF. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic value of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to PA systolic pressure (PASP) ratio as a non-invasive measure of RV-to-PA coupling in patients undergoing TMVR with MitraClip (Abbott, CA, USA). Methods: Multicentre registry including 228 consecutive patients that underwent successful TMVR with MitraClip. The sample was divided in two groups according to TAPSE/PASP median value: 0.35. The primary combined endpoint encompassed HF readmissions and all-cause mortality. Results: Mean age was 72.5 ± 11.5 years and 154 (67.5%) patients were male. HF readmissions and all-cause mortality were more frequent in patients with TAPSE/PASP ≤ 0.35: Log-Rank 8.844, p = 0.003. On Cox regression, TAPSE/PASP emerged as a prognostic predictor of the primary combined endpoint, together with STS-Score. TAPSE/PASP was a better prognostic predictor than either TAPSE or PASP separately. Conclusions: TAPSE/PASP ratio appears as a novel prognostic predictor in patients undergoing MitraClip implantation that might improve risk stratification and candidate selection.

Some important studies have shown that patient-prosthesis mismatch is a frequent occurrence after surgical aortic valve replacement that impairs survival. The Trifecta valve (St. Jude Medical Inc, St. Paul, MN) has special architecture designed to achieve the best hemodynamic profile. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of mismatch when using this prosthesis. This study included 1,302 patients at 3 months postoperatively, 339 patients with a Trifecta prosthesis and 963 patients (the control group) with a Mitroflow aortic valve (Sorin Group Inc, Mitroflow Division, Vancouver, Canada). Multinomial multivariate logistic regression was calculated to estimate the association between the Trifecta prosthesis and moderate or severe patient-prosthesis mismatch. Any degree of mismatch was present in 5.9% of the Trifecta group and in 42.4% in the Mitroflow group. Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch was present in 3.8% of the patients with a Trifecta valve and in 32.6% in the Mitroflow group. Severe mismatch was present in 2.1% of the patients with a Trifecta prosthesis and in 9.8% of the patients with a Mitroflow valve. All differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The odds ratio of the Trifecta prosthesis as protector against mismatch was 16.9 (95% confidence interval, 9.5 to 30.4) and 11.9 (95% confidence interval, 5.3 to 26.7) for moderate or severe mismatch, respectively. The prevalence of patient-prosthesis mismatch using the Trifecta aortic prosthesis is extraordinary low. This finding may have great clinical repercussions in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.