Elizabeth Botha

Dr. Elizabeth Botha

CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 August 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJunlin Han
Junlin Han
MSMehrdad Shoeiby
Mehrdad Shoeiby
Tim J MalthusTim J Malthus
Tim J Malthus
EBElizabeth Botha
Elizabeth Botha
JAJanet Anstee
Janet Anstee
LPLars Petersson
Lars Petersson
Underwater image restoration is of significant importance in unveiling the underwater world. Numerous techniques and algorithms have been developed in recent decades. However, due to fundamental difficulties associated with imaging/sensing, lighting, and refractive geometric distortions in capturing clear underwater images, no comprehensive evaluations have been conducted with regard to underwater image restoration. To address this gap, we constructed a large-scale real underwater image dataset, dubbed Heron Island Coral Reef Dataset (‘HICRD’), for the purpose of benchmarking existing methods and supporting the development of new deep-learning based methods. We employed an accurate water parameter (diffuse attenuation coefficient) to generate the reference images. There are 2000 reference restored images and 6003 original underwater images in the unpaired training set. Furthermore, we present a novel method for underwater image restoration based on an unsupervised image-to-image translation framework. Our proposed method leveraged contrastive learning and generative adversarial networks to maximize the mutual information between raw and restored images. Extensive experiments with comparisons to recent approaches further demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method. Our code and dataset are both publicly available.

1 November 2016 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLeo Lymburner
Leo Lymburner
EBElizabeth Botha
Elizabeth Botha
EHErin Hestir
Erin Hestir
JAJanet Anstee
Janet Anstee
SSStephen Sagar
Stephen Sagar
Tim J MalthusTim J Malthus
Tim J Malthus

1 April 2013 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBElizabeth Botha
Elizabeth Botha
VBVittorio Brando
Vittorio Brando
JAJanet Anstee
Janet Anstee
ADArnold Graham Dekker
Arnold Graham Dekker
SSStephen Sagar
Stephen Sagar

1 December 2007 in International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBElizabeth Botha
Elizabeth Botha
BLBrigitte Leblon
Brigitte Leblon
BZBernie Zebarth
Bernie Zebarth
JWJames Watmough
James Watmough

23 April 2010 in International Journal of Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBElizabeth Botha
Elizabeth Botha
Brigitte LeblonBrigitte Leblon
Brigitte Leblon
BZB. J. Zebarth
B. J. Zebarth
JWJ. Watmough
J. Watmough
Optimizing nitrogen (N) fertilization in crop production by in-season measurements of crop N status may improve fertilizer N use efficiency. Hyperspectral measurements may be used to assess crop N status indirectly by estimating leaf and canopy chlorophyll content. This study evaluated the ability of the PROSAIL canopy-level reflectance model to predict leaf chlorophyll content of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) during the growth stages between pre-tillering (Zadoks Growth Stage (ZGS 15)) to booting (ZGS50). Spring wheat was grown under different N fertility rates (0–200 kg N ha−1) in 2002. Canopy reflectance, leaf chlorophyll content, N content and leaf area index (LAI) values were measured. There was a weakly significant trend for the PROSAIL model to over-estimate LAI and under-estimate leaf chlorophyll content. To compensate for this interdependency by the model, a canopy chlorophyll content parameter (the product of leaf chlorophyll content and LAI) was calculated. The estimation accuracy for canopy chlorophyll content was generally low earlier in the growing season. This failure of the PROSAIL model to estimate leaf and canopy variables could be attributed to model sensitivity to canopy architecture. Earlier in the growing season, full canopy closure was not yet achieved, resulting in a non-homogenous canopy and strong soil background interference. The canopy chlorophyll content parameter was predicted more accurately than leaf chlorophyll content alone at booting (ZGS 45). A strong relationship between canopy chlorophyll content and canopy N content at ZGS 45 indicates that the PROSAIL model may be used as a tool to predict wheat N status from canopy reflectance measurements at booting or later.

28 May 2016 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EBElizabeth Botha
Elizabeth Botha
VBVittorio Brando
Vittorio Brando
ADArnold Graham Dekker
Arnold Graham Dekker
Increased sophistication of high spatial resolution multispectral satellite sensors provides enhanced bathymetric mapping capability. However, the enhancements are counter-acted by per-pixel variability in sunglint, atmospheric path length and directional effects. This case-study highlights retrieval errors from images acquired at non-optimal geometrical combinations. The effects of variations in the environmental noise on water surface reflectance and the accuracy of environmental variable retrievals were quantified. Two WorldView-2 satellite images were acquired, within one minute of each other, with Image 1 placed in a near-optimal sun-sensor geometric configuration and Image 2 placed close to the specular point of the Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF). Image 2 had higher total environmental noise due to increased surface glint and higher atmospheric path-scattering. Generally, depths were under-estimated from Image 2, compared to Image 1. A partial improvement in retrieval error after glint correction of Image 2 resulted in an increase of the maximum depth to which accurate depth estimations were returned. This case-study indicates that critical analysis of individual images, accounting for the entire sun elevation and azimuth and satellite sensor pointing and geometry as well as anticipated wave height and direction, is required to ensure an image is fit for purpose for aquatic data analysis.