Thorsten Wiechmann

Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann

Fachgebiet Raumordnung und Planungstheorie, Fakultät Raumplanung, Technische Universität Dortmund, 44221 Dortmund, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2012 in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TWThorsten Wiechmann
Thorsten Wiechmann
Karina PallagstKarina Pallagst
Karina Pallagst

1 April 2016 in Progress in Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMCristina Martinez-Fernandez
Cristina Martinez-Fernandez
TWTamara Weyman
Tamara Weyman
SFSylvie Fol
Sylvie Fol
IAIvonne Audirac
Ivonne Audirac
ECEmmanuèle Cunningham-Sabot
Emmanuèle Cunningham-Sabot
HYHiroshi Yahagi
Hiroshi Yahagi

1 August 2013 in European Planning Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TWThorsten Wiechmann
Thorsten Wiechmann
MBMarco Bontje
Marco Bontje
(2015). Responding to Tough Times: Policy and Planning Strategies in Shrinking Cities. European Planning Studies: Vol. 23, Responding to Tough Times: Policy and Planning Strategies in Shrinking Cities, pp. 1-11.

2 October 2018 in disP - The Planning Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PSPeter Schmitt
Peter Schmitt
TWThorsten Wiechmann
Thorsten Wiechmann
Since the 1990s, the concept of governance has become an integral element of spatial planning research. In this article, we revisit some of the key contributions to the literature to discuss how and to what extent governance theory has informed planning theory so far and what the implications are for our understanding of how to construe planning practices. Next, we examine the current governance literature in order to identify promising elements that can further inform planning theory and practice. More specifically, we discuss relations between hybrid modes of governance in regard to cross-sectoral coordination of actors and institutions, and the implications of various forms of learning within governance networks. Finally, we suggest entry points for planning research such as studying the combination and interplay of various modes of governance to understand the inherent functioning of spatial planning assemblages, or investigating the learning capacity of actors and institutions in order to anticipate their adaptive capacity to respond to changing contexts in spatial planning practice. However, we also point out a few, yet troublesome implications. One of them is that planning understood as the governance of place might imply that the term “planning” as such becomes meaningless and that planning theory might turn into a subsection of (institutional) political theory. The article serves as a framing text for this special issue as it addresses a number of key elements and underlying concepts of the governance literature that are relevant for understanding the procedural dimension of spatial planning and which underpin some of the issues that are addressed in the more case study-based contributions by the other authors.

30 November 2021 in Planning Theory & Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGérard Hutter
Gérard Hutter
TWThorsten Wiechmann
Thorsten Wiechmann
Since past and present inevitably form the basis for the future distribution of activities in space, the time dimension is as essential for spatial planning as it is for any other type of planning....