The development of mutant BRAF inhibitors has improved the outcome for melanoma patients with BRAFV600E mutations. Although the initial response to these inhibitors can be dramatic, sometimes resulting in complete tumor regression, the majority of melanomas become resistant. To study resistance to BRAF inhibition, we developed a novel mouse model of melanoma using a tetracycline/doxycycline-regulated system that permits control of mutant BRAF expression. Treatment with doxycycline leads to loss of mutant BRAF expression and tumor regression, but tumors recur after a prolonged period of response to treatment. Vemurafenib, encorafenib and dabrafenib induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in BRAF melanoma cell lines; however, a residual population of tumor cells survive. Comparing gene expression in human cell lines and mouse tumors can assist with the identification of novel mechanisms of resistance. Accordingly, we conducted RNA sequencing analysis and immunoblotting on untreated and doxycycline-treated dormant mouse melanomas and human mutant BRAF melanoma cell lines treated with 2 μM vemurafenib for 20 days. We found conserved expression changes in histone methyltransferase genes ASH2, EZH2, PRMT5, SUV39H1, SUV39H2, and SYMD2 in P-ERK low, p-38 high melanoma cells following prolonged BRAF inhibition. Quantitative mass spectrometry, determined a corresponding reduction in histone Lys9 and Lys27 methylation and increase in Lys36 methylation in melanoma cell lines treated with 2 μM vemurafenib for 20 days. Thus, these changes as are part of the initiate response to BRAF inhibition and likely contribute to the survival of melanoma cells.

Aberrant activation of the PI3K–AKT pathway is common in many cancers, including melanoma, and AKT1, 2 and 3 (AKT1–3) are bona fide oncoprotein kinases with well-validated downstream effectors. However, efforts to pharmacologically inhibit AKT have proven to be largely ineffective. In this study, we observed paradoxical effects following either pharmacologic or genetic inhibition of AKT1–3 in melanoma cells. Although pharmacological inhibition was without effect, genetic silencing of all three AKT paralogs significantly induced melanoma cell death through effects on mTOR. This phenotype was rescued by exogenous AKT1 expression in a kinase-dependent manner. Pharmacological inhibition of PI3K and mTOR with a novel dual inhibitor effectively suppressed melanoma cell proliferation in vitro and inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Furthermore, this single-agent–targeted therapy was well-tolerated in vivo and was effective against MAPK inhibitor–resistant patient-derived melanoma xenografts. These results suggest that inhibition of PI3K and mTOR with this novel dual inhibitor may represent a promising therapeutic strategy in this disease in both the first-line and MAPK inhibitor–resistant setting.

Targeted therapies have revolutionized cancer care, but the development of resistance remains a challenge in the clinic. To identify rational targets for combination strategies, we used an established melanoma mouse model and selected for resistant tumors following genetic suppression of NRAS expression. Complete tumor regression was observed in all mice, but 40% of tumors recurred. Analysis of resistant tumors showed that the most common mechanism of resistance was overexpression and activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Interestingly, the most commonly overexpressed RTK was Met and inhibition of Met overcame NRAS resistance in this context. Analysis of NRAS mutant human melanoma cells showed enhanced efficacy of cytotoxicity with combined RTK and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibition. In this study, we establish the importance of adaptive RTK signaling in the escape of NRAS mutant melanoma from inhibition of RAS and provide the rationale for combined blockade of RAS and RTK signaling in this context.

Potential anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic effects of aspirin (ASA) may be suitable for melanoma chemoprevention, but defining biomarkers in relevant target tissues is prerequisite to performing randomized controlled chemoprevention trials. We conducted open-label studies with ASA in 53 human subjects with melanocytic nevi at increased risk for melanoma. In a pilot study, 12 subjects received a single dose (325 mg) of ASA; metabolites salicylate, salicylurate, and gentisic acid were detected in plasma after 4–8 h, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE₂) was suppressed in both plasma and nevi for up to 24 h. Subsequently, 41 subjects received either 325 or 81 mg ASA (nonrandomized) daily for one week. ASA metabolites were consistently detected in plasma and nevi, and PGE₂ levels were significantly reduced in both plasma and nevi. Subchronic ASA dosing did not affect 5” adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation in nevi or leukocyte subsets in peripheral blood, although metabolomic and cytokine profiling of plasma revealed significant decreases in various (non-ASA-derived) metabolites and inflammatory cytokines. In summary, short courses of daily ASA reduce plasma and nevus PGE₂ and some metabolites and cytokines in plasma of human subjects at increased risk for melanoma. PGE₂ may be a useful biomarker in blood and nevi for prospective melanoma chemoprevention studies with ASA.

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are being developed as a type of immunotherapy and have demonstrated durable tumor responses and clinical efficacy. One such OV, Coxsackievirus A21 (CVA21), exhibited therapeutic efficacy in early phase clinical trials, demonstrating the ability to infect and kill cancer cells and stimulate anti-tumor immune responses. However, one of the major concerns in using this common cold virus as a therapeutic is the potential for innate and adaptive immune responses to mitigate the benefits of viral infection, particularly in individuals that have been exposed to coxsackievirus prior to treatment. In this study, we assess melanoma responses to CVA21 in the absence or presence of prior exposure to the virus. Melanomas were transplanted into naïve or CVA21-immunized C57BL6 mice and the mice were treated with intratumoral (IT) CVA21. We find that prior exposure to CVA21 does not dramatically affect tumor responses, nor does it alter overall survival. Our results suggest that prior exposure to coxsackievirus is not a critical determinant of patient selection for IT CVA21 interventions.