This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.

Unclaimed
Ilaria Rigo
DiSTAV (Department of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences), University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, Italy

Honors and Awards

The user has no records in this section


Career Timeline

The user has no records in this section.


Short Biography

The user biography is not available.
Following
Followers
Co Authors
The list of users this user is following is empty.
Following: 0 users

Feed

Journal article
Published: 21 April 2021 in Sustainability
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Forest ecosystems are important providers of ecosystem functions and services belonging to four categories: supporting, provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services. Forest management, generally focused on timber production, has consequences on the ability of the system to keep providing services. Silviculture, in fact, may affect the ecological structures and processes from which services arise. In particular, the removal of biomass causes a radical change in the stocks and flows of energy characterizing the system. Aiming at the assessment of differences in stored natural capital and ecosystem functions and services provision, three differently managed temperate forests of common beech (Fagus sylvatica) were considered: (1) a forest in semi-natural condition, (2) a forest carefully managed to get timber in a sustainable way and (3) a forest exploited without management. Natural capital and ecosystem functions and services are here accounted in biophysical terms. Specifically, all the resources used up to create the biomass (stock) and maintain the production (flow) of the different components of the forest system were calculated. Both stored emergy and empower decrease with increasing human pressure on the forest, resulting in a loss of natural capital and a diminished ability of the natural system to contribute to human well-being in terms of ecosystem services provision.

ACS Style

Paolo Vassallo; Claudia Turcato; Ilaria Rigo; Claudia Scopesi; Andrea Costa; Matteo Barcella; Giulia Dapueto; Mauro Mariotti; Chiara Paoli. Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs. Exploitation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4638 .

AMA Style

Paolo Vassallo, Claudia Turcato, Ilaria Rigo, Claudia Scopesi, Andrea Costa, Matteo Barcella, Giulia Dapueto, Mauro Mariotti, Chiara Paoli. Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs. Exploitation. Sustainability. 2021; 13 (9):4638.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paolo Vassallo; Claudia Turcato; Ilaria Rigo; Claudia Scopesi; Andrea Costa; Matteo Barcella; Giulia Dapueto; Mauro Mariotti; Chiara Paoli. 2021. "Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs. Exploitation." Sustainability 13, no. 9: 4638.

Preprint
Published: 09 March 2021
Reads 0
Downloads 0

Forest ecosystems are important providers of ecosystem functions and services belonging to four categories: supporting, provisioning, regulating, and cultural ecosystem services. Forest management, generally focused on timber production, has consequences on the ability of the system to keep providing services. Silviculture, in fact, may affect ecological structures and processes from which services arise. In particular, the removal of biomass causes a radical change in the stocks and flows of energy characterizing the system. Aiming at the assessment of differences in stored natural capital and ecosystem functions and services provision, three differently managed temperate forests of common beech (Fagus sylvatica) were considered: (1) a forest in semi-natural condition, (2) a forest carefully managed to get timber in a sustainable way and (3) a forest exploited without management. Natural capital and ecosystem functions and services are here accounted in biophysical terms. Specifically, all the resources used up to create the biomass (stock) and maintain the production (flow) of the different components of the forest system were calculated. Both stored emergy and empower decrease at increasing human pressure on the forest, resulting in a loss of natural capital and a diminished ability of the natural system to contribute to human well-being in terms of ecosystem services provision.

ACS Style

Paolo Vassallo; Claudia Turcato; Rigo Ilaria; Claudia Scopesi; Andrea Costa; Matteo Barcella; Giulia Dapueto; Mauro Mariotti; Chiara Paoli. Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value Under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs Exploitation. 2021, 1 .

AMA Style

Paolo Vassallo, Claudia Turcato, Rigo Ilaria, Claudia Scopesi, Andrea Costa, Matteo Barcella, Giulia Dapueto, Mauro Mariotti, Chiara Paoli. Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value Under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs Exploitation. . 2021; ():1.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paolo Vassallo; Claudia Turcato; Rigo Ilaria; Claudia Scopesi; Andrea Costa; Matteo Barcella; Giulia Dapueto; Mauro Mariotti; Chiara Paoli. 2021. "Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value Under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs Exploitation." , no. : 1.