Christina Turesson

Dr. Christina Turesson

Department of health, medicine and caring sciences, Linköping university
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2009 in Journal of Hand Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTChristina Turesson
Christina Turesson
LBL. Borén
L. Borén
GLG.M. Liedberg
G.M. Liedberg

1 July 2014 in The Journal of Hand Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTChristina Turesson
Christina Turesson
BKBarbro Krevers
Barbro Krevers
GNGöran Nylander
Göran Nylander
JKJoanna Kvist
Joanna Kvist

1 January 2012 in American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTChristina Turesson
Christina Turesson
BKBarbro Krevers
Barbro Krevers
JKJoanna Kvist
Joanna Kvist
We investigated interrater reliability of range of motion (ROM) measurement in the finger joints of people with Dupuytren’s disease. Eight raters measured flexion and extension of the three finger joints in one affected finger of each of 13 people with different levels of severity of Dupuytren’s disease, giving 104 measures of joints and motions. Reliability measures, represented by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of the mean (SEM), and differences between raters with the highest and lowest mean scores, were calculated. ICCs ranged from .832 to .973 depending on joint and motion. The SEM was ≤3° for all joints and motions. Differences in mean between highest and lowest raters were larger for flexion than for extension; the largest difference was in the distal interphalangeal joint. The results indicate that following these standardized guidelines, the interrater reliability of goniometer measurements is high for digital ROM in people with Dupuytren’s disease.

17 March 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGunilla Liedberg
Gunilla Liedberg
MBMathilda Björk
Mathilda Björk
Elena DragiotiElena Dragioti
Elena Dragioti
CTChristina Turesson
Christina Turesson
Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a significant burden for employees, employers, and society. However, more knowledge is needed about which interventions reduce sick leave. Interventions were defined as the act or an instance of intervening, provided by different stakeholders. This review synthesizes the experiences of patients, employers, and health professionals concerning the interventions that influence returning to work and staying at work for persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain. A literature search was performed using several combinations of key terms. Overall, 18 qualitative studies published between 2002 and 2018 were included. Qualitative analysis assessed how much confidence could be placed in each review finding. Moderate evidence was found for factors improving the return to work process such as collaboration between stakeholders, including the persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain and support from all involved actors in the process. Moderate evidence was found for self-management strategies and workplace adjustments needed to facilitate more persons to returning to work and staying at work despite pain. This review provides stakeholders, employers, and health professionals’ information that could be used to develop and implement interventions to increase the possibilities for persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain returning to work or staying at work.

11 October 2020 in Clinical Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJonas Svingen
Jonas Svingen
JRJenny Rosengren
Jenny Rosengren
CTChristina Turesson
Christina Turesson
MAMarianne Arner
Marianne Arner
Evaluate the effect of a smartphone application on exercise adherence, range of motion and self-efficacy compared to standard rehabilitation after repair of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon. Prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Four hand surgery departments in Sweden. A total of 101 patients (35 women) (mean age 37.5 ± 12.8) were randomised to control (n = 49) or intervention group (n = 52). A smartphone application to facilitate rehabilitation. Adherence assessed with the Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale at two and six weeks (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes were self-reported adherence in three domains assessed at two and six weeks, self-efficacy assessed with Athlete Injury Self-Efficacy Questionnaire at baseline, two and six weeks. Range of motion and perceived satisfaction with rehabilitation and information were assessed at 12 weeks. Twenty-five patients were lost to follow-up. There was no significant between group difference in Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale at two or six weeks, mean scores (confidence interval, CI 95%) 12.5 (CI 11.8–13.3), 11.8 (CI 11.0–12.8) for the intervention group, and 13.3 (CI 12.6–14.0), 12.8 (CI 12.0–13.7) for the control group. Self-reported adherence for exercise frequency at six weeks was significantly better for the intervention group, 93.2 (CI 86.9–99.5) compared to the controls 82.9 (CI 76.9–88.8) (P = 0.02). There were no differences in range of motion, self-efficacy or satisfaction. The smartphone application used in this study did not improve adherence, self-efficacy or range of motion compared to standard rehabilitation for flexor tendon injuries. Further research regarding smartphone applications is needed. I. Randomised controlled trial

1 July 2020 in Journal of Hand Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTChristina Turesson
Christina Turesson
JKJoanna Kvist
Joanna Kvist
BKBarbro Krevers
Barbro Krevers