Geir Slupphaug

Prof. Geir Slupphaug

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 1997 in Biochemical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHans E. Krokan
Hans E. Krokan
RSRune Standal
Rune Standal
GSGeir Slupphaug
Geir Slupphaug
A wide range of cytotoxic and mutagenic DNA bases are removed by different DNA glycosylases, which initiate the base excision repair pathway. DNA glycosylases cleave the N-glycosylic bond between the target base and deoxyribose, thus releasing a free base and leaving an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. In addition, several DNA glycosylases are bifunctional, since they also display a lyase activity that cleaves the phosphodiester backbone 3′ to the AP site generated by the glycosylase activity. Structural data and sequence comparisons have identified common features among many of the DNA glycosylases. Their active sites have a structure that can only bind extrahelical target bases, as observed in the crystal structure of human uracil-DNA glycosylase in a complex with double-stranded DNA. Nucleotide flipping is apparently actively facilitated by the enzyme. With bacteriophage T4 endonuclease V, a pyrimidine-dimer glycosylase, the enzyme gains access to the target base by flipping out an adenine opposite to the dimer. A conserved helix–hairpin–helix motif and an invariant Asp residue are found in the active sites of more than 20 monofunctional and bifunctional DNA glycosylases. In bifunctional DNA glycosylases, the conserved Asp is thought to deprotonate a conserved Lys, forming an amine nucleophile. The nucleophile forms a covalent intermediate (Schiff base) with the deoxyribose anomeric carbon and expels the base. Deoxyribose subsequently undergoes several transformations, resulting in strand cleavage and regeneration of the free enzyme. The catalytic mechanism of monofunctional glycosylases does not involve covalent intermediates. Instead the conserved Asp residue may activate a water molecule which acts as the attacking nucleophile.

20 February 2003 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PAPer Arne Aas
Per Arne Aas
MOMarit Otterlei
Marit Otterlei
PFPål Ø. Falnes
Pål Ø. Falnes
CVCathrine B. Vågbø
Cathrine B. Vågbø
FSFrank Skorpen
Frank Skorpen
HKHans E. Krokan
Hans E. Krokan

1 November 2004 in DNA Repair
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FDFinn Drabløs
Finn Drabløs
EFEmadoldin Feyzi
Emadoldin Feyzi
PAPer Arne Aas
Per Arne Aas
CVCathrine B. Vaagbø
Cathrine B. Vaagbø
BKBodil Kavli
Bodil Kavli
HKHans E. Krokan
Hans E. Krokan

7 September 2003 in Nature Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KIKohsuke Imai
Kohsuke Imai
GSGeir Slupphaug
Geir Slupphaug
WLWen-I Lee
Wen-I Lee
PRPatrick Revy
Patrick Revy
SNShigeaki Nonoyama
Shigeaki Nonoyama
ADAnne Durandy
Anne Durandy

7 November 1996 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGeir Slupphaug
Geir Slupphaug
CMClifford D. Mol
Clifford D. Mol
BKBodil Kavli
Bodil Kavli
AAAndrew S. Arvai
Andrew S. Arvai
HKHans E. Krokan
Hans E. Krokan
JTjohn Tainer
john Tainer

16 December 2002 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHans E Krokan
Hans E Krokan
FDFinn Drabløs
Finn Drabløs
GSGeir Slupphaug
Geir Slupphaug
Uracil in DNA results from deamination of cytosine, resulting in mutagenic U : G mispairs, and misincorporation of dUMP, which gives a less harmful U : A pair. At least four different human DNA glycosylases may remove uracil and thus generate an abasic site, which is itself cytotoxic and potentially mutagenic. These enzymes are UNG, SMUG1, TDG and MBD4. The base excision repair process is completed either by a short patch- or long patch pathway, which largely use different proteins. UNG2 is a major nuclear uracil-DNA glycosylase central in removal of misincorporated dUMP in replication foci, but recent evidence also indicates an important role in repair of U : G mispairs and possibly U in single-stranded DNA. SMUG1 has broader specificity than UNG2 and may serve as a relatively efficient backup for UNG in repair of U : G mismatches and single-stranded DNA. TDG and MBD4 may have specialized roles in the repair of U and T in mismatches in CpG contexts. Recently, a role for UNG2, together with activation induced deaminase (AID) which generates uracil, has been demonstrated in immunoglobulin diversification. Studies are now underway to examine whether mice deficient in Ung develop lymphoproliferative malignancies and have a different life span.