Mutational heterogeneity represents one of the greatest barriers impeding the progress toward the clinic of gene therapies for many dominantly inherited disorders. A general strategy of gene suppression in conjunction with replacement has been proposed to overcome this mutational heterogeneity. In the current study, various aspects of this strategy are explored for a dominant form of the retinal degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa (RP), caused by mutations in the rhodopsin gene (RHO-adRP). While >200 mutations have been identified in rhodopsin (RHO), in principle, suppression and replacement may be employed to provide a single mutation-independent therapeutic for this form of the disorder. In the study we demonstrate in a transgenic mouse simulating human RHO-adRP that RNA interference–based suppression, together with gene replacement utilizing the endogenous mouse gene as the replacement, provides significant benefit as evaluated by electroretinography (ERG). Moreover, this is mirrored histologically by preservation of photoreceptors. AAV-based vectors were utilized for in vivo delivery of the therapy to the target cell type, the photoreceptors. The results demonstrate that RNAi-based mutation-independent suppression and replacement can provide benefit for RHO-adRP and promote the therapeutic approach as potentially beneficial for other autosomal dominantly inherited disorders.

A major difficulty associated with the design of gene therapies for autosomal dominant diseases is the immense intragenic heterogeneity often encountered in such conditions. In order to overcome such difficulties we have designed, and evaluated in vitro, three strategies which avoid a requirement to target individual mutations for genetic suppression. In the first, normal and mutant alleles are suppressed by targeting sequences in transcribed but untranslated regions of transcript (UTRs), enabling introduction of a replacement gene with the correct coding sequencing but altered UTRs to prevent suppression. A second approach involves suppression in coding sequence and concurrent introduction of a replacement gene by exploiting the degeneracy of the genetic code. A third strategy utilises intragenic polymorphism to suppress the disease allele specifically, the advantage being that a proportion of patients with different disease mutations have the same polymorphism. These approaches provide a wider choice of target sequence than those directed to single disease mutations and are appropriate for many mutations within a given gene. General methods for suppression may be directed towards the primary defect or a secondary effect associated with the disease process, such as apoptosis. Three general methods targeting the primary defect which circumvent problems of allelic genetic heterogeneity are explored in vitro using hammerhead ribozymes designed to target transcripts from the rhodopsin, peripherin and collagen 1A1 and 1A2 genes, extensive genetic heterogeneity being a feature of associated disease pathologies.

IRDs are one of the leading causes of visual loss in children and young adults. Mutations in over 271 genes lead to retinal dysfunction, degeneration and sight loss. Though no cure exists, gene augmentation therapy has brought hope to the field. This systematic review sought to assess the efficacy of available gene therapy treatments for IRDs. Databases and public resources were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs). Standard methodological procedures were used, including a risk-of-bias assessment. One RCT and five NRSIs were assessed, all for adeno-associated virus two (AAV2)-mediated treatment of RPE-specific 65 kDa (RPE65)-associated LCA (Leber congenital amaurosis). Five outcomes were reported for meta-analyses. Modest improvements in visual acuity, ambulatory navigation/mobility testing or central retinal thickness was observed. There was significant improvement in red and blue light full-field stimulus testing (FST) (red light risk ratio of 1.89, treated v control, p = 0.04; and blue light risk ratio of 2.01, treated v control, p = 0.001). Study design assessment using a ROBIN-I tool (Cochrane Library) showed risk-of-bias judgement to be “low/moderate”, whilst there were “some concerns” for the RCT using a RoB-2 tool (Cochrane Library). Although comparison by meta-analysis is compromised by, amongst other issues, a variable amount of vector delivered in each trial, FST improvements demonstrate a proof-of-principle for treating IRDs with gene therapy.