Stephen G. Schwartz

Dr. Stephen G. Schwartz

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Naples, FL 34108, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 December 2015 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LFLars G. Fritsche
Lars G. Fritsche
WIWilmar Igl
Wilmar Igl
JBJessica Cooke Bailey
Jessica Cooke Bailey
FGFelix Grassmann
Felix Grassmann
SSSebanti Sengupta
Sebanti Sengupta
IHIris M. Heid
Iris M. Heid
Iris Heid, Gonçalo Abecasis, Sudha Iyengar and colleagues report the results of a large genome-wide association meta-analysis of macular degeneration based on over 43,000 subjects. They identify 16 new risk loci, including some very rare coding variants. Advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the elderly, with limited therapeutic options. Here we report on a study of >12 million variants, including 163,714 directly genotyped, mostly rare, protein-altering variants. Analyzing 16,144 patients and 17,832 controls, we identify 52 independently associated common and rare variants (P < 5 × 10−8) distributed across 34 loci. Although wet and dry AMD subtypes exhibit predominantly shared genetics, we identify the first genetic association signal specific to wet AMD, near MMP9 (difference P value = 4.1 × 10−10). Very rare coding variants (frequency <0.1%) in CFH, CFI and TIMP3 suggest causal roles for these genes, as does a splice variant in SLC16A8. Our results support the hypothesis that rare coding variants can pinpoint causal genes within known genetic loci and illustrate that applying the approach systematically to detect new loci requires extremely large sample sizes.

1 January 2017 in Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFM. Elizabeth Fini
M. Elizabeth Fini
Stephen G. SchwartzStephen G. Schwartz
Stephen G. Schwartz
XGXiaoyi Gao
Xiaoyi Gao
SJShinwu Jeong
Shinwu Jeong
NPNitin Patel
Nitin Patel
WSW. Daniel Stamer
W. Daniel Stamer

1 January 2015 in Clinical Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Stephen G. SchwartzStephen G. Schwartz
Stephen G. Schwartz
KVKamyar Vaziri
Kamyar Vaziri
KKKrishna Kishor
Krishna Kishor
JFJr. Harry W. Flynn
Jr. Harry W. Flynn
Endophthalmitis is an uncommon diagnosis but can have devastating visual outcomes. Endophthalmitis may be endogenous or exogenous. Exogenous endophthalmitis is caused by introduction of pathogens through mechanisms such as ocular surgery, open-globe trauma, and intravitreal injections. Endogenous endophthalmitis occurs as a result of hematogenous spread of bacteria or fungi into the eye. These categories of endophthalmitis have different risk factors and causative pathogens, and thus require different diagnostic, prevention, and treatment strategies. Novel diagnostic techniques such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) have been reported to provide improved diagnostic results over traditional culture techniques and may have a more expanded role in the future. While the role of povidone-iodine in prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis is established, there remains controversy with regard to the effectiveness of other measures, including prophylactic antibiotics. The Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) has provided us with valuable treatment guidelines. However, these guidelines cannot be directly applied to all categories of endophthalmitis, highlighting the need for continued research into attaining improved treatment outcomes.

1 March 2016 in Clinical Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stephen G. SchwartzStephen G. Schwartz
Stephen G. Schwartz
KVKamyar Vaziri
Kamyar Vaziri
KKKrishna Kishor
Krishna Kishor
HFHarry Flynn
Harry Flynn
Despite treatment advances, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) can have poor visual outcomes even with prompt and appropriate therapy. Pars plana vitrectomy is a leading management modality for the treatment of RD. This procedure is generally accompanied by the use of internal tamponade. Various gases and silicone oils may yield beneficial outcomes. Heavy silicone oils have been approved in some European nations but are not available in the USA. Different tamponade agents have unique benefits and risks, and choice of the agent should be individualized according to the characteristics of the patient and RD, as well as perioperative and postoperative factors.

1 April 2016 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KVKamyar Vaziri
Kamyar Vaziri
Stephen G. SchwartzStephen G. Schwartz
Stephen G. Schwartz
HFHarry W. Flynn
Harry W. Flynn
KKKrishna S. Kishor
Krishna S. Kishor
AMAndrew A. Moshfeghi
Andrew A. Moshfeghi

1 January 2012 in Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPD. Wilkin Parke
D. Wilkin Parke
APAvinash Pathengay
Avinash Pathengay
HFHarry W Flynn
Harry W Flynn
TAThomas Albini
Thomas Albini
Stephen G. SchwartzStephen G. Schwartz
Stephen G. Schwartz
Purpose. To analyze risk factors for endophthalmitis and retinal detachment (RD) in patients with retained intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs).Design. A retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series.Participants. All patients treated at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute for traumatic IOFBs between 1999 and 2008.Methods. Analysis of visual outcome, mechanism of injury, management, and postoperative course.Results. 108 eyes with IOFBs were identified. Endophthalmitis occurred in 7 eyes (6.4%) at presentation, and risk was higher with vegetable matter exposure (P=0.003). All eyes with posterior segment IOFBs received intravitreal antibiotics and there were no cases of endophthalmitis after initial management. RD was identified in 6 of 108 eyes (5.5%) at presentation. Risk factors were entry more than 5 mm behind the limbus (P<0.001) and posterior segment IOFB (P=0.028). Postoperative RD occurred in 11 of 102 eyes (10.7%). Risk factors for postoperative RD were preoperative endophthalmitis (P=0.001), posterior segment IOFB (P=0.008), and retinal impact sites (P=0.028).Conclusions. Risk factors for endophthalmitis included vegetable matter exposure and delay to initial management. Risk factors for RD were posterior entry site, posterior segment IOFB, endophthalmitis, and retinal impact sites. No eyes developed endophthalmitis after presentation.