Trabectedin (ET743, Yondelis^®, manufactured by Baxter Oncology GmbH, Halle/Westfalen, Germany, for Janssen Products, LP, Horsham, PA), derived from the marine ascidian, Ecteinascidia turbinata, is a natural alkaloid with multiple complex mechanisms of action. On 23 October 2015, 15 years after the results of the first Phase 1 clinical trial using trabectedin for chemotherapy-resistant solid malignancies was reported, and 8 years after its approval in Europe, the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) finally approved trabectedin for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma that has failed a prior anthracycline-containing regimen. Approval was based on the results of a pivotal Phase 3 trial involving a 2:1 randomization of 518 patients (who were further stratified by soft tissue sarcoma subtype), in which a significant improvement in progression-free survival was reported in the trabectedin-treated group vs. the dacarbazine-treated group (p < 0.001). In this trial, the most common adverse reactions were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, constipation, anorexia, diarrhea, peripheral edema, dyspnea, and headache, while the most serious were neutropenic sepsis, rhabdomyolysis, cardiomyopathy, hepatotoxicity, and extravasation leading to tissue necrosis. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were laboratory abnormalities of myelosuppression in both arms and transient transaminitis in the trabectedin arm. In a recent Phase 2 trial, trabectedin had a similar outcome as doxorubicin when given as a single agent in the first-line setting. Studies are also being conducted to expand the use of trabectedin not only as a first-line cancer drug, but also for a number of other clinical indications, for example, in the case of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, for which trabectedin has been reported to be exceptionally active. The possibility of combining trabectedin with targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors or virotherapy would also be an interesting concept. In short, trabectedin is an old new drug with proven potential to impact the lives of patients with soft tissue sarcoma and other solid malignancies. Funding: Sarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA 90405.

Background: This Phase 1/2 study is based on the hypothesis that immune checkpoint inhibitors are more effective when given earlier in the course of the disease for advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: Phase I endpoints—maximum tolerated dose in previously treated patients; Phase II endpoints—best response, progression free survival and overall survival and incidence of adverse events in previously untreated patients; Phase I treatments—escalating doses of trabectedin (1.0, 1.2, 1.5 mg/m²) as continuous intravenous infusion over 24 h every 3 weeks, 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab given intravenously every 12 weeks, and 3 mg/kg of nivolumab given intravenously every 2 weeks; Phase II treatments—maximum tolerated dose of trabectedin and defined doses of ipilimumab and nivolumab. Results: Phase I (n = 9)—the maximum tolerated dose of trabectedin was 1.2 mg/m²; Phase II (n = 79)—6 complete responses, 14 partial responses, 49 stable disease, 25.3% best response rate, 87.3% disease control rate; median progression-free survival, 6.7 months (CI 95%: 4.4–7.9), median overall survival, 24.6 months (CI 95%: 17.0–.); Grade 3/4 therapy-related adverse events (n = 92)—increased ALT (25%), fatigue (8.7%), increased AST (8.7%), decreased neutrophil count (5.4%) and anemia (4.6%). Conclusion: SAINT is a safe and effective first-line treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Background: Intratumoral injection of talimogene laherparepvec evokes a cytotoxic immune response. Therefore, the combination of talimogene laherparepvec with trabectedin and nivolumab may have synergistic effects in advanced sarcomas.Patients and methods: This phase 2 trial was conducted from May 30, 2019 to January 31, 2022. Endpoints: Primary: Progression free survival rate at month 12. Secondary: Best overall response, progression free survival rate at 6 and 9 months, overall survival rate at 6, 9, and 12 months, incidence of conversion of an unresectable tumor to a resectable tumor, and incidence of adverse events. Eligible patients had to be ≥ 18 years of age, have advanced histologically proven sarcoma, at least 1 previous chemotherapy regimen, and at least one accessible tumor for intratumoral injection. Treatment: Trabectedin intravenously (1.2 mg/m² q3 weeks), nivolumab intravenously (3 mg/kg q2 weeks), and intratumoral talimogene laherparepvec (1x10⁸ plaque forming units/ml q2 weeks).Results: Median time of follow-up: 15.2 months. Efficacy analysis: Thirty-nine patients who had completed at least one treatment cycle and had a follow-up computerized tomography were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Median number of prior therapies: 4 (range 1-11). Progression free survival rate at month 12, 36.7%. Confirmed Best Overall Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 = 3 partial responses, 30 stable disease, 6 progressive disease. Best Overall Response Rate, 7.7%, Disease Control Rate, 84.6%; median progression free survival, 7.8 (95% Confidence Intervals: 4.1-13.1) months; 6-, 9-, 12-month progression free survival rates, 54.5%/45.9%/36.7%; median overall survival 19.3 (95% Confidence Intervals: 12.8 -.) months; 6-, 9- and 12-month overall survival rate, 86.9%/73.3%/73.3%. One patient had a complete surgical resection. Fifty percent of patients had a ≥ grade 3 treatment related adverse events which included anemia (6%), thrombocytopenia (6%), neutropenia (4%), increased alanine transaminase (4%), decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (4%), dehydration (4%), hyponatremia (4%).Conclusions: Taken together these data suggest that the TNT regimen is effective and safe for advanced previously treated sarcomas, and is worth being further studied in a randomized phase 3 trial as first- or second- line treatment for patients with advanced sarcomas.

Background/Aim: Advanced sarcoma has a poor prognosis. Dysregulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) occurs in various types of cancer. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of mTOR inhibitor nab-sirolimus when combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab. Patients and Methods: Previously treated patients ≥18 years with confirmed diagnosis of advanced sarcoma or tumor with mutations in the mTOR pathway were treated with 3 mg/kg nivolumab intravenously every 3 weeks; escalating doses of nab-sirolimus at 56, 75 or 100 mg/m² were administered intravenously on days 8 and 15 beginning in cycle 2. The primary aim was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose; we also determined disease control, objective response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and correlation between response using Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (irRECIST) versus RECIST v1.1. Results: The maximum-tolerated dose was 100 mg/m². There were two patients with partial response, 12 with stable disease and 11 with progressive disease. Median progression-free and overall survival were 12 and 47 weeks, respectively. The best responders (partial responses) were patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma with loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN), tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) mutation and estrogen receptor-positive leiomyosarcoma. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or more included thrombocytopenia, oral mucositis, rash, hyperlipidemia and increased serum alanine aminotransferase. Conclusion: The data indicate that (i) treatment with nivolumab plus nab-sirolimus is safe with no unexpected adverse events; (ii) treatment outcome parameters were not improved by combining nivolumab with nab-sirolimus; and (iii) best responders were patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma with PTEN loss and TSC2 mutation and estrogen receptor-positive leiomyosarcoma. Future direction in sarcoma research with nab-sirolimus will be biomarker-based (TSC1/2/mTOR, tumor mutational burden/mismatch repair deficiency etc.).

Background: The heterogeneity of sarcomas and resulting distinct sub-type specific characteristics, their high recurrence rates, and tendency for distant metastasis, continue to present significant challenges to providing optimal treatments. Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of current literature and clinical trials in gene and cell therapies for sarcomas. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted utilizing the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar and clinicaltrials.gov. Search terms included “gene therapy”, “cell therapy”, “NK cell therapy, “CAR-T therapy”, “virotherapy”, “sarcoma”, “gene therapy”, and “solid tumors”. Additional sources were identified through manual searching for references of relevant studies. No language restrictions were set. The NCT number, study status, condition, and phase were noted for clinical trials. Results: There are only three gene and cell therapies for sarcomas that have been approved by a federal regulatory agency. Rexin-G: the first tumor-targeted gene therapy vector designed to target all advanced solid malignancies, including chemo-refractory osteosarcomas and soft tissue sarcomas, was approved by the Philippine FDA in 2007. Gendicine was the first oncolytic virus approved for intratumoral delivery in China in 2003. Afami-cel, an innovative chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, was approved for synovial sarcoma in the United States in 2024. Other promising therapies are discussed in the text. Conclusions: The future of gene and cell therapy for sarcomas holds great promise, as research moves to late-stage clinical development. The integration of gene and cell therapies into standard sarcoma treatment protocols has the potential to significantly improve the quality of life and outcomes for patients with this rare and challenging group of cancers.

Background: Metastatic breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and therefore, innovative therapies are urgently needed. Here, we report on the results of a Phase I-II study using DeltaRex-G for chemotherapy resistant metastatic carcinoma of breast.Patients and Methods:Endpoints: Dose limiting toxicity; Antitumor activity. Eligibility: ≥18 years of age, pathologic diagnosis of breast carcinoma, adequate hematologic and organ function. Treatment: Dose escalation of DeltaRex-G 1-4 x 10¹¹cfu intravenously thrice weekly x 4 weeks with 2-week rest period. Treatment cycles repeated if there is ≤ Grade 1 toxicity until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Safety: NCI CTCAE v3 for adverse events reporting, vector related testing. Efficacy: RECIST v1.0, International PET criteria and Choi criteria for response, progression free and overall survival.Results: Twenty patients received escalating doses of DeltaRex-G from 1 × 10¹¹ cfu to 4 × 10¹¹ cfu thrice weekly for 4 weeks with a 2-week rest period. Safety: ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related adverse event: pruritic rash (n = 1), no dose limiting toxicity, no replication-competent retrovirus, nor vector-neutralizing antibodies detected. No vector DNA integration was observed in peripheral blood lymphocytes evaluated. Efficacy: by RECIST v1.0: 13 stable disease, 4 progressive disease; tumor control rate 76%; by PET and Choi Criteria: 3 partial responses, 11 stable disease, 3 progressive disease; tumor control rate 82%. Combined median progression free survival by RECIST v1.0, 3.0 months; combined median overall survival, 20 months; 1-year overall survival rate 83% for Dose Level IV. Biopsy of residual tumor in a participant showed abundant CD8⁺ killer T-cells and CD45⁺ macrophages suggesting an innate immune response. Two patients with pure bone metastases had >12-month progression free survival and overall survival and are alive 12 years from the start of DeltaRex-G therapy. These patients further received DeltaRex-G + DeltaVax for 6 months.Conclusion: Taken together, these data indicate that 1) DeltaRex-G has a distinctively high level of safety and exhibits anti-cancer activity, 2) PET/Choi provide a higher level of sensitivity in detecting early signs of tumor response to DeltaRex-G, 3) DeltaRex-G induced 12- year survival in 2 patients with pure bone metastases who subsequently received DeltaVax immunotherapy, and 4) DeltaRex-G may prove to be a biochemical and/or immune modulator when combined with other cancer therapy/immunotherapy.